## Summary
The reviewed revision is correctly indexed with the requested SHA-256, preserves the existing weekly/adaptive durability boundaries, and stays within the OpenAI-only/no-Kimi scope. It is not approvable: its anchor grammar makes every accepted output a finite boilerplate wrapper, so the central requirement—actual LLM Korean humanization across daily, weekly, dualcoachtest adaptive, and physique-coach adaptive—is still unmet.

## Claims
- `index.jsonl` records `stage-07-revision.md` with SHA-256 `559432ea369ba0b40759868a522adbd78a68291220486a2090d08fae7b6f64db`.
- The plan identifies the actual daily free-text seam in Hermes (`telegram.py:5629-5948`), renders weekly before the existing reservation (`telegram.py:6359-6578`), and correctly recognizes that adaptive recovery republishes `card_payload` (`nutrition_coaching.py:3677-3757`).
- The two active source renderers differ as planned: physique-coach is structured `결정`/`근거`/status (`physique-coach/checkin_cli/adaptive_nutrition.py:4649-4688`), while dualcoachtest contains `현재 판단` and optional `검토 필요` prose (`dualcoachtest/checkin_cli/adaptive_nutrition.py:4877-4916`).
- The weekly prepared-body reader is a proportionate extension of the existing append-only schedule ledger: present receipts expose only digests while the ledger retains body/destination (`customer_schedule.py:89-130,1348-1435,1675-1680` in both profiles).

## Analysis
The plan has strong safety and replay posture: canonical fallback is explicit, weekly selected bytes are reserved before send, adaptive selected bytes are pinned before publication, recovery does not re-call a provider, and the direct client intentionally avoids the auxiliary provider resolver. Those boundaries are faithful to the source and materially improve the old daily free-text seam.

The central design contradicts its own goal. The provider receives no semantic capsule or canonical text, and the validator only allows four fixed leads, two fixed joins, fixed sentence patterns, and opaque anchors whose semantic expansion is performed locally. Each surface is therefore a finite set of local templates. In particular, physique adaptive can only decorate the code-authored instruction with a fixed lead. Calling that a raw, model-authored Korean composition does not make it actual LLM humanization; the planned live proof can only demonstrate an LLM chose one of those wrappers.

A second boundary remains underspecified. `presentation_identity` is described as a separate live validation immediately before `mark_publish_pending`, but no atomic handoff binds that validation to the pending-card append. Existing `mark_publish_pending` validates payload shape rather than a just-validated proposal/revision/authority identity (`nutrition_coaching.py:3481-3535,3677-3757`). The plan needs a single locked operation or a verified single-use presentation claim.

## Root Cause
The revision tries to eliminate all semantic authority from the model by withholding semantic content and allowing only opaque anchors. That is a sound safety instinct, but the chosen grammar collapses the feature into deterministic templating and cannot meet the requested humanization outcome.

## Findings
- **HIGH — reported P1** — `stage-07-revision.md:81-123`: Grammar v1 permits only finite fixed wrappers around local anchor expansions, so none of the four surfaces receives genuine model-authored Korean. Replace it with bounded, redacted semantic capsules plus semantic/lexical validation and locked factual/action tokens, or explicitly reduce the feature to deterministic templating.
- **MEDIUM — reported P2** — `stage-07-revision.md:56-78`: Adaptive pre-validation is not bound atomically to `mark_publish_pending`. Validate and append under the same service locks, or consume a single-use identity claim inside `mark_publish_pending`; add an authority-change interleaving test.

## Recommendations
1. Resolve P1 before implementation: allow open-ended Korean paraphrase within each typed slot while keeping redacted immutable tokens for every fact, decision, action, safety and delivery state. The model must receive enough bounded semantic context to write a natural sentence, and the validator must reject changes beyond the permitted token/intent set.
2. Make adaptive validation-to-persistence atomic as described in P2.
3. Retain the existing weekly prepared-material read API and no-retry/recovery design; they are targeted and consistent with the current ledger model.

## Architectural Status
BLOCK

## Code Review Recommendation
REQUEST CHANGES

## Tradeoffs
| Option | Humanization | Safety / determinism | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current opaque anchors + finite grammar | None beyond boilerplate selection | Very high | Does not meet the request |
| Redacted semantic capsule + constrained free-form slot with immutable fact/action tokens | Genuine Korean phrasing | High when intent/token validators fail closed | Recommended |
| Fully free-form post-render prose | High | Insufficient; reintroduces the old semantic-authority defect | Reject |