## Summary
Reviewed `stage-03-revision.md` for RALPLAN run `2098aaed-2367-4cab-8629-a0e5c5c8203f`. The run index binds that exact absolute path to SHA-256 `33ec1f4df3e8ed322ad002e47e668f1d629315f2fc44603f8e7120cd006d892a`, matching the assigned pin. Revision 3 closes the prior blocking concerns without widening the clarified product scope.

## Claims
- `.gjc/_session-019f8455-334a-7000-99ca-318dfd0e06b1/plans/ralplan/2098aaed-2367-4cab-8629-a0e5c5c8203f/index.jsonl` records the reviewed path and assigned SHA-256 in its stage-3 revision receipt.
- The current product helper still resolves the configured provider directly and truncates ordinary output to 500 characters (`/home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/gateway/platforms/telegram.py:6162-6205`). Revision 3 explicitly preserves that unrelated runtime/provider behavior, making the no-Kimi condition an execution-agent constraint rather than an unrequested product migration.
- Current finalized daily snapshots are mappings that include user-entered fields such as `optional_note` and `operator_note` (`/home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/gateway/platforms/physique_checkin.py:459-483`). Revision 3 replaces direct mapping ingress with the three named frozen factories and rejects mappings at `_humanize_korean_copy`.
- The current humanizer already measures response size in UTF-8 bytes (`/home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/gateway/platforms/korean_humanizer.py:92`), and the existing auxiliary client exposes the model-aware output-cap helper `auxiliary_max_tokens_param` (`/home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/agent/auxiliary_client.py:4417-4442`). Revision 3's byte and token-cap contract is implementable within the stated file scope.

## Analysis
### Spec compliance
Revision 3 directly closes each prior concern under the clarified scope:
1. It removes the false requirement for a product-wide OpenAI/Kimi provider migration while retaining the mandated OpenAI-only execution agents and fake-callable tests.
2. `DailyGroundingInput.from_finalized_snapshot`, `WeeklyGroundingInput.from_summary`, and `AdaptiveGroundingInput.from_card` define the missing nominal conversion boundaries. Their allowlists, type checks, free-text dropping, and mapping rejection eliminate the direct-mapping contradiction.
3. It narrows model selection to offered soft explanatory atom IDs. Canonical decisions, actions, timing, safety, approval/delivery state, headings, facts, and ordering remain locked; hard identity/order mismatch fails to canonical. This is the deterministic semantic authority the earlier free-form design lacked.
4. It requires existing consent/enablement authority before each typed input, so daily, weekly, and adaptive paths fail closed with zero calls when authority is absent or revoked.
5. It states a single UTF-8-byte response limit and a 256-token provider budget, with ASCII/Korean boundary tests and canonical disablement when the budget cannot be applied.
6. It limits receipts to code-derived digests, IDs, booleans, outcome, surface, and playbook version, and preserves canonical-only behavior when a binding digest is unavailable.
7. It names the authoritative profile module, requires an exact dualcoachtest copy, and excludes raw corpus, review queue, persistence, and deployment additions.

### Architecture
The selected design remains the smallest safe integration: the existing guarded document owns all semantic claims and the model only chooses finite, context-derived soft IDs and code-owned expression variants. Two synchronous stage requests occur before existing publication/reservation boundaries, with one-attempt fallback to canonical or validated stage-1 output. No new retrieval service, database, or provider-routing layer is introduced.

### Antithesis and synthesis
A broad runtime provider gate would be stronger for a separate product-provider migration, but it would change the current shared completion and conversation routes contrary to the final clarified scope. The adopted execution-only no-Kimi boundary plus deterministic fake-callable tests is the correct narrow contract. Direct snapshot mappings and playbook-wide atoms would create a smaller diff but would reintroduce the previously confirmed raw-data and semantic-drift defects; the three factories and offered-soft-atom rule are necessary.

## Root Cause
The earlier plan conflated the execution-model restriction with product provider selection and treated raw snapshot mappings plus broadly allowlisted atoms as trusted semantic inputs. Revision 3 separates those concerns and restores code ownership at each boundary.

## Findings
None. Previously reported HIGH and MEDIUM concerns are closed by Revision 3's explicit contracts.

## Recommendations
Proceed with Revision 3 exactly: retain the typed factory allowlists, consent/enablement preconditions, offered-soft-atom validation, UTF-8 byte caps, model-aware 256-token request budget, per-surface digest binding, one-receipt rule, and byte-parity test. Do not broaden provider behavior or reintroduce free-form model prose.

## Architectural Status
CLEAR

## Code Review Recommendation
APPROVE

## Tradeoffs
- Clarified execution-only no-Kimi constraint: preserves runtime compatibility and meets this task's agent constraint. Recommended for this narrow scope.
- Product-wide provider allowlist: changes unrelated configured runtime behavior; intentionally out of scope.
- Frozen factories plus offered soft atoms: modest adapter work with deterministic privacy and semantic preservation. Recommended.
- Direct mappings or free-form model text: smaller diff but bypasses the validated authority boundary. Rejected.