## Summary

**OKAY.** The planner artifact pin is verified in its RALPLAN index: `stage-01-planner.md` has SHA-256 `19d5d240c3807f4a66ab5fd2366f9e74abfe713659af68156896a4b379f3b020`. It is an executable, bounded two-stage coaching plan: code owns facts and all semantic atoms/variants, while each model stage only selects validated IDs.

## Claims

- The artifact index binds the reviewed planner path and supplied SHA.
- `gateway/platforms/korean_humanizer.py` already isolates editable prose slots and deterministically restores canonical copy on invalid output.
- `gateway/platforms/telegram.py` has the daily, weekly, and two adaptive-operator publication seams; `gateway/platforms/nutrition_coaching.py` already refreshes live registry/consent and checks safety at transport boundaries.
- The plan limits grounding to curated doctrine, requires exact 3–5 approved principles, typed inputs, finite soft atoms, code-owned variants, two ordered calls without retries, 1,024-byte responses, and a non-sensitive receipt.

## Analysis

The plan correctly replaces the prior unconstrained prose contract with ID-only model outputs: stage 1 may choose only offered soft explanatory atoms and principle IDs, while stage 2 may choose only code-owned variants. Locked decisions, actions, timing, safety, delivery state, facts, headings, and ordering remain outside both model schemas.

Its authority and failure design is coherent: unavailable/malformed grounding and invalid stage 1 return canonical; invalid stage 2 retains validated coaching; any authority/consent/safety/revision change at every stated gate returns byte-identical canonical. The separate bounded stage transport leaves the existing ordinary completion helper and unrelated routes unchanged. No blocker was found.

## Root Cause

Not applicable; this is a planning review.

## Findings

None.

## Recommendations

Proceed as written. Preserve the final-closure precedence: exactly 3–5 approved principles, IDs only at both model boundaries, and unconditional canonical fallback on any gate change.

## Architectural Status

CLEAR

## Code Review Recommendation

APPROVE

## Tradeoffs

- Chosen finite-ID pipeline: lower prose freedom and two-call latency, but deterministic semantic safety, bounded privacy exposure, and canonical fallback.
- Rejected free-form/RAG pipeline: more expressive, but admits invented actions/timing/safety claims and expands retrieval/storage scope.