{ "schema": "dualcoach-task26-objective-constraint-oracle-redacted-v1", "recorded_at_utc": "2026-08-14T07:02:40Z", "review_lane": "F1 objective and invariant coverage", "verdict": "FAIL", "release_decision": "NO-GO", "scope": { "candidate_or_profile_mutations": 0, "code_or_plan_or_ledger_edits": 0, "external_actions": 0, "release_actions": 0, "review_method": "read-only audit of the revised plan, ledger, candidate and successor manifests, freeze receipts, and canonical Tasks 1-25 evidence, with focused review of Tasks 22-25" }, "decisive_basis": [ "The evidence does not identify and bind the live Tasks 23-25 lifecycle to one terminal immutable candidate containing the later source repairs.", "The retained lifecycle used incident recovery and one-use recovery successors, and the live Task24 Regenerate action failed lineage binding before an undeployed repair; therefore the plan-wide no-normal-path-recovery-shortcut criterion is false or unproved.", "Required real-surface acceptance evidence is missing, especially Task22 screenshots and Task23 activation-notice, all-question/Q7, in-check-in restart, final-save generation-job, and customer-screen proof.", "Task25 reached a clean terminal state but its evidence controller directly replaced configuration bytes, recursively deleted runtime artifacts, and unlinked stale lock files around the canonical reset API, so canonical-disable-only execution is not established." ], "candidate_provenance": { "status": "FAIL", "plan_requirement": "Production release evidence must come from the exact immutable candidate under review.", "observed_manifests": [ { "artifact": ".omo/evidence/dualcoach-candidate-manifest.json", "candidate_digest": "c160085a64454c23f789464170b299543324c743a489bac68ed5430fab42d291", "telegram_source_sha256": "574e03c9b3b4b9b3c3fe036a1ff656125a338ab2d4c75a85d729bcf4995b22c0" }, { "artifact": ".omo/evidence/dualcoach-task22-supplemental-compatibility-manifest.json", "candidate_digest": "3ce5b95637211b0289529c35b452cf1771fe868a34777140388a8caa75e183cc", "telegram_source_sha256": "574e03c9b3b4b9b3c3fe036a1ff656125a338ab2d4c75a85d729bcf4995b22c0" }, { "artifact": ".omo/evidence/dualcoach-task23-expiry-supersession-manifest.json", "candidate_digest": "70da304abb9dde339699d4f871104aa8aca1e9e029bdfb8e737bce38a81e5c59", "telegram_source_sha256": "ce35a2e77af14994949aa5a9de12c0b742bd87fcd73cfa48f1e3b7c5d39320c6", "profile_package_source_included": false } ], "later_unmanifested_or_unbound_sources": [ { "artifact": ".omo/evidence/task23-session-recovery/task23-automated-final-auth-recovery-gate-checkpoint-redacted.json", "telegram_source_sha256": "6a39333c4c5ab2910f949f8103dd18eba6d5c6b7a4d7182fb35eaf2189cafbd2", "wheel_sha256": "3d1f7153e52e7d62f16c29ab6228e0dc96fd87c0483e76984da632944218c5fa" }, { "artifact": ".omo/evidence/dualcoach-task-24-evidence.json", "telegram_source_sha256": "7740711ba483e6cd7bada83893faa625ea7c43e7436a1168fc1acfb356ecd2c7" }, { "artifact": ".omo/evidence/dualcoach-task-24-regenerate-lineage-repair.json", "nutrition_coaching_source_sha256": "2d10de01391b02228eb17625b6cfd3c01ee0be0219d417b19b355af9f3e6eb09", "wheel_sha256": "231015faefda6d4d146a02e393b29922a6ecf5d7693d2e71396c184a0ccd491e", "live_deployment": "explicitly not performed" } ], "terminal_manifest_contains_task24_final_sources": false }, "owner_operator_and_trainer_free": { "status": "FAIL_AS_RELEASE_PROOF", "positive_scoped_evidence": [ "Task18 and Task19 contain trainer-free amendments.", "Task22 terminal evidence reports trainer authority absent and owner/operator-scoped branch tests.", "Task24 records the authenticated Owner action, zero delivery on approval, and one explicit synthetic send.", "Task25 records an empty registry, zero runtime setup authorities, and an inactive/dead service." ], "release_blockers": [ "The plan declares the earlier Task4, Task5, Task15, Task16, Task18, and Task21 trainer-bearing artifacts superseded and unusable as v1 release proof.", "The ledger still describes Task18 as including a trainer and Task21 as preparing customer/owner/trainer roles.", "The later owner-only evidence is not bound to one terminal immutable candidate containing the Task23 and Task24 repairs." ], "active_trainer_artifact_proved_at_task25_terminal": false, "sole_authority_release_claim_authorized": false }, "invariant_coverage": [ { "invariants": "1-4", "status": "PASS_SCOPED_NOT_RELEASE_BOUND", "evidence": "Tasks 22-24 report disabled/no-delivery before activation and approval, zero delivery after approval before send, then one provider message and one sent_audited receipt." }, { "invariants": "5-9", "status": "PARTIAL", "evidence": "Automated/disposable negative and restart matrices plus Task24 terminal receipts support the behaviors, but not all waiting boundaries or the repaired Regenerate path were exercised live from the terminal candidate; required screenshots are absent." }, { "invariant": "10 exact immutable candidate", "status": "FAIL", "evidence": "Manifested Telegram source hashes differ from the Task23 successful-recovery and Task24 source hashes, and no manifest pins the final Task24 Telegram and lineage-repair sources." }, { "invariant": "11 owner/operator sole authority and trainer-free v1", "status": "PARTIAL", "evidence": "Later scoped evidence reports owner-only authority and trainer absence, but superseded trainer-bearing ledger/evidence remains the only task-specific proof for several revised acceptances and the later flow is not terminal-candidate-bound." } ], "task_acceptance_coverage": [ { "tasks": "1-3", "status": "FAIL_PROVENANCE", "reason": "The manifest/runbook artifacts exist, but no terminal manifest reconciles the later Task23-24 source changes and deployed package." }, { "tasks": "4-6", "status": "PARTIAL", "reason": "The original trainer-bearing Task4/5 evidence is explicitly superseded; later owner-only tests exist but are not mapped to the terminal candidate." }, { "tasks": "7-14", "status": "PARTIAL", "reason": "Behavioral receipts exist, but candidate-level revalidation after the Task23/24 source repairs is absent." }, { "tasks": "15-16", "status": "PARTIAL", "reason": "The plan explicitly supersedes the trainer-route receipts; later matrices do not provide terminal-candidate-bound replacement evidence for every revised acceptance." }, { "task": "17", "status": "PASS_SCOPED", "reason": "Task25 terminal evidence reports inactive/dead runtime, zero profile processes, and no PID/lock residue." }, { "tasks": "18-20", "status": "PARTIAL", "reason": "Trainer-free amendments and quality results exist only for earlier candidate digests and were not rerun against the final repaired bytes." }, { "task": "21", "status": "FAIL_RELEASE_PROOF", "reason": "The retained topology/ledger includes a trainer and is explicitly superseded; no fresh terminal-candidate-bound trainer-free Task21 preflight package replaces it." }, { "task": "22", "status": "FAIL_FULL_ACCEPTANCE", "reason": "The scoped terminal behavior passed, but screenshots are explicitly unavailable and the no-recovery-shortcut criterion is explicitly not claimed after authorized replay." }, { "task": "23", "status": "FAIL_FULL_ACCEPTANCE", "reason": "The canonical PASS proves a finalized 12-answer event and a separately authorized one-use recovery child, not one clean activation/check-in-to-automatic-generation path; it omits required activation-notice, question/Q7, in-check-in restart, generation-job, and customer-screen evidence." }, { "task": "24", "status": "FAIL_FULL_ACCEPTANCE", "reason": "The live Regenerate action produced an unparented child and BLOCKED; the repair was not deployed, Edit was used as forward recovery, and the successful full matrix was disposable/mocked rather than a rerun of the repaired live path." }, { "task": "25", "status": "FAIL_EXECUTION_PATH", "reason": "The terminal cleanup state is strong, but the one-use evidence controller performed direct config replacement, recursive runtime-tree deletion, and lock unlinking around the canonical reset API, so the specified canonical disable transaction is not the sole cleanup path." } ], "canonical_evidence_integrity": { "referenced_path_sha256_pairs_checked": { "task22": 3, "task23": 13, "task24": 7, "task25": 5 }, "referenced_digest_mismatches": 0, "completeness_status": "FAIL", "completeness_reason": "Task24's canonical PASS index omits both the live Regenerate BLOCKED artifact and the undeployed lineage-repair artifact. Digest integrity of selected files does not establish completeness." }, "findings": [ { "id": "C1", "severity": "CRITICAL", "title": "No single terminal immutable candidate binds the reviewed lifecycle", "remediation": "Freeze one complete manifest and reproducible deployable package containing every Task23/24 repair, including profile-package bytes; deploy exactly that digest and bind all later evidence to it." }, { "id": "C2", "severity": "CRITICAL", "title": "No clean normal-surface lifecycle without recovery shortcuts", "remediation": "From a clean disabled baseline, rerun Tasks21-25 once on the frozen candidate through Telegram only, with automatic post-check-in generation and a successful Regenerate/Edit/Approve/Send sequence; do not use replay, one-use recovery children, forced publication, or direct service calls." }, { "id": "H1", "severity": "HIGH", "title": "Task23 required real-surface acceptance evidence is incomplete", "remediation": "Capture redacted customer-surface evidence for activation notice, all 12 rendered questions, Q7 choices/navigation, restart-preserved answers, one final event/job, and zero pre-Task24 delivery." }, { "id": "H2", "severity": "HIGH", "title": "Task24 canonical PASS package excludes adverse lineage evidence", "remediation": "Supersede the Task24 index with a complete chain that includes the BLOCKED Regenerate and repair artifacts, then replace them with a repaired live rerun on the exact candidate." }, { "id": "H3", "severity": "HIGH", "title": "Revised trainer-free acceptance mapping still relies on superseded task evidence", "remediation": "Rerun and reindex the revised owner-only Task18-21 automation/quality/topology gates on the terminal candidate and reconcile the stale trainer-bearing ledger descriptions without deleting historical records." }, { "id": "H4", "severity": "HIGH", "title": "Task22 required screenshots and no-shortcut proof are absent", "remediation": "Capture the required redacted customer and owner/operator surfaces during the clean rerun and provide an explicit no-recovery-shortcut attestation backed by the event chain." }, { "id": "H5", "severity": "HIGH", "title": "Task25 does not prove canonical-disable-only cleanup", "remediation": "Use a supported profile-scoped disable/cleanup/reconciliation interface for gate rollback, job removal, archive/reset, and stale authority cleanup; retain proof that no one-use controller directly replaces or deletes durable/runtime files." } ], "minimum_pass_condition": "Resolve C1, rerun one clean trainer-free owner/operator lifecycle satisfying C2 on that exact digest, capture H1/H4 evidence, publish complete canonical indexes including adverse history, rerun affected automated gates, and perform canonical-only cleanup.", "receipt_privacy": { "raw_customer_content": false, "raw_model_output": false, "telegram_identifiers": false, "credentials_or_tokens": false } }