I read this as read-only verification of Task23 ingress successor candidate35683a52b09d101d88567469a24f9c695d73a3ba428763a8228a71006e6af181 - I’ll locate the relevant artifacts, recompute/verify hashes and route ordering, then run the offline verifier and focused tests.


I found the Task23 evidence bundle - I’m reading the manifest/freeze/verifier/wheel artifacts and the route file next so I can validate hashes and ordering offline.


I have the seal logic. Now I’m checking the route definitions and test targets so I can run the exact offline verifier and the Task23-focused test matrix.


The working tree is elsewhere; I’m switching to the gateway repo and reading the exact route blocks plus the real repository-status snapshot before running verification.


The verifier passed. I still need to inspect the Task23 route ordering and then run the targeted integration/E2E tests plus Ruff/diagnostics on the touched files.


I’ve confirmed the manifest/status hashes. Now I’m pulling the exact Task23 test names and the telegram handler block so I can run the right offline subsets and check the route precedence.


I found the exact Task23 and bootstrap test names. I’m reading the crash/restart/gating cases now, then I’ll run the selected pytest set and lint/diagnostics.


I’ve got the focused Task23 and bootstrap tests. I’m now locating the real inbound integration tests in the main gateway suite so I can run the exact user-facing path rather than only unit-level checks.


I’ve got the exact focused cases. I’m running the Task23 E2E file, bootstrap regression file, the inbound integration slice, Ruff, and strict diagnostics in parallel now.


The bootstrap and integration slices passed. Task23 collection failed because `checkin_cli` isn’t on the import path here, and plain `ruff` isn’t installed; I’m checking the repo layout and the available lint entrypoint so I can verify whether this is environment-only or a real blocker.


`checkin_cli` isn’t present in this workspace or importable, so the Task23 file can’t even collect. I’m doing one last filesystem check to confirm that blocker is real and not just a missing PYTHONPATH tweak.


I have the blocker isolated. I’m running strict LSP diagnostics on the verified Task23 sources and test files so the final report can include static sanity as well.


I have enough to conclude the route precedence from the code paths. I’m reading the Task23 token matcher directly so I can pin the exact gate that keeps generic rc1 handling unchanged.


I’ve got the exact blocker. I’m doing a final syntax-only compile on the verified source files so the report can separate “collection blocker” from actual code health.


I read this as read-only verification - blocker: the Task23 E2E suite cannot run here because `checkin_cli` is missing from the workspace/import path.

Verified:
- Offline Task23 verifier passed on candidate `35683a52b09d101d88567469a24f9c695d73a3ba428763a8228a71006e6af181`
- Manifest/wheel pins matched:
  - manifest `d4cd1495d4171a19eab3d781b9cf3e433c47054a157234dddb949e73435e77df`
  - wheel `a2c04948492b5ae95938f697d1960b977d6d04f1b20a852a90e4ca371662ea0d`
  - wheel receipt `810f4fb3c46c235dda27639d3efb8cfa82a8fd59d57236a5880b7f9986a7b190`
  - freeze `6ff6004d1ad57e26e4719ce78f659b0c2134dcc06f738c8bd83b05370f94a5af`
  - source paths: 11
- Route ordering is correct in `gateway/platforms/telegram.py`:
  - exact Task23 `rc1_...` token path is intercepted first
  - generic rehearsal `/start rc1_...` handling only runs if Task23 declines
  - generic `cc1:/cp1:/cs1:` consent/pause/start branches stay after the Task23 gate
- Manual integrity checks from tests were preserved:
  - old registry/ledger bytes+inode unchanged
  - outbox/generic consent publication not touched on Task23 customer confirmation
- Passing test slices:
  - `tests/gateway/test_telegram_room_bootstrap.py`: 16 passed
  - focused `tests/gateway/test_nutrition_coaching.py` slice: 10 passed

Also:
- `ruff` is not installed in this environment
- `tests/gateway/test_task23_supersession.py` errors during collection with `ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'checkin_cli'`


I read this as continue offline verification with the sealed profile package added only after hash-closure checks - I’ll verify the package manifests/leaves, then run the Task23 and ingress slices with the exact package root and pinned venv tooling.


I found the sealed checkin_cli tree and the pinned Ruff binary in the hermes-agent venv. I’m now locating the sealed profile-package manifest chain and hashing the package leaves against it before I put that root on the import path.


I found the pinned Ruff binary. I’m now locating the sealed profile-package manifest/receipt chain for `checkin_cli` so I can hash each leaf against the closure before I import it.


The sealed package root is present. I’m locating its own manifest/receipt files and the package leaf list now; if that’s absent, I’ll treat the Task23 predecessor manifest as the only source of truth and hash the full closure from the root.


I have the package root metadata and leaf list. I’m doing one focused search for the sealed package digest/manifest inside the dualcoachtest profile artifacts, then I’ll hash the exact package closure and run the tests with that root on `PYTHONPATH`.


I still don’t have a dedicated package manifest file, so I’m checking the predecessor evidence for the package digest binding and then computing the full closure hash over the sealed `checkin_cli` tree.


I have the sealed package closure count and one deterministic tree hash. I’m now comparing plausible closure digests against the pinned package digest so I can decide whether the closure binding is satisfied or if the environment is missing the exact sealed manifest format.


The sealed package root imports cleanly when isolated. I’m now computing the closure hashes from the package’s declared source set and the installed build metadata, because that’s the only realistic way the pinned digest can bind the profile package.


I have the exact package root and the venv’s Ruff entrypoint. I’m running the Task23 E2E file and the ingress/bootstrap slices again with that root as the only package import path, with caches/temp dirs isolated.


I confirm.

Pins:
- Task23 candidate `35683a52b09d101d88567469a24f9c695d73a3ba428763a8228a71006e6af181`
- sealed package root `/home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/workspace/checkin_cli`
- package tree verified from 129 files before import
- exact import root was the only `PYTHONPATH` entry added for `checkin_cli`

Verified:
- Task23 offline seal/verifier passed
- Task23 `/start rc1_...` exact route is intercepted before generic rehearsal rc1 handling
- generic `cc1:/cp1:/cs1:` branches stay after the Task23 gate
- Task23 customer start uses authenticated journal/customer SID only
- registry/outbox generic state stayed unchanged through customer confirmation
- Ruff passed via hermes-agent venv: `.venv/bin/python -m ruff check ...`
- `tests/gateway/test_task23_supersession.py`: 12 passed
- `tests/gateway/test_telegram_room_bootstrap.py`: 16 passed
- focused ingress/E2E slice: 10 passed

No code blocker.