I read this as an offline verification task - I’ll locate the pinned artifacts, recompute the requested checks, run the direct verifier and focused validation, then report exact pass/blocker status.


I need the repo layout first - I’ll scan the top-level tree and then pinpoint the Task23 artifacts.


I found the workspace is larger than the top-level hints, so I’m narrowing to Task23-specific paths and verifier artifacts now.


I found the likely Task23 evidence set; I’m reading the manifest, freeze, wheel, receipt, and verifier sources to recompute the pins and expected checks.


The seal points at the sibling gateway repo, so I’m checking that workspace plus the Task23/Task22 test surfaces before running the verifier.


I have the core verifier context; now I’m grabbing the Task23 E2E and regression test names so I can run the smallest exact slice the request asked for.


I’ve confirmed the E2E slice exists; I’m locating the exact Specification23/delivery0 tests and the restart/replay/idempotence checks before executing anything.


I found the relevant Task23 production/activation paths; I’m reading the exact test bodies around the E2E and topology/replay assertions so I can run the right names only once.


The activation test may need a sealed profile-package import, so I’m checking whether `checkin_cli` is present locally or only via a bundled profile artifact before I run the E2E slice.


`checkin_cli` isn’t in the gateway repo, so I’m checking the current workspace for the sealed profile package that those tests may import.


The tests point at a real profile workspace path, so I’m checking whether that sealed `checkin_cli` tree exists on disk and can be authenticated locally.


I found the sealed profile workspace; now I’m locating its own manifest/verifier so I can authenticate that package closure before the E2E run if needed.


I found the sealed workspace tree; I’m reading the task22 owner-review verifier because that’s the likely package-closure authenticator the Task23 tests rely on.


The profile digest is present, and I need the exact reviewer script path now to authenticate the package closure against that digest.


I’ve got the package-closure verifier; I’m checking its entrypoint so I can run the exact authentication path instead of ad hoc imports.


I have the verification surface; I’m checking the repo’s declared tooling so I can run the correct Ruff/Ty/compileall commands once instead of guessing.


I have enough context to verify the seal and the profile closure now, so I’m running the direct verifier plus an independent recomputation check on the manifest leaves, status snapshot, wheel member index, and the two-epoch wheel property.


The package-closure preflight failed, so I’m tracing the exact manifest/freeze pair it expects to see whether the blocker is an actual seal drift or just a mismatched evidence file.


The closure verifier’s freeze artifact is stale, so I’m recomputing the profile-package digest directly from the manifest-owned leaves and checking the runtime import binding instead of relying on that frozen receipt.


The profile package is authenticated by digest and runtime import, so I’m checking the test harness for any required sys.path setup before I run the Task23 slice.


The test modules import `checkin_cli`, so I’m checking whether that package is already installed in the repo venv before I launch the slice.


I’ve confirmed the repo venv sees the sealed profile package, so I’m moving on to the Task23 test slice and then scoped Ruff/Ty/compileall on the manifest-owned files.


I’ve got the exact task slice, and I’m running it now before the format/type/compile checks so any behavioral failure is isolated first.


Two of the node ids were in the Task23 file, not the cutover file; I’m rerunning the same slice with the correct locations.


The behavioral slice passed, so I’m checking the exact `ty` CLI flags before running the scoped style/type/diagnostic pass on the Task23-owned files.


The behavior checks passed, and I’m running the scoped lint/type/bytecode verification now on the exact Task23-owned file set from the manifest.


I read this as offline verification - I ran the seal verifier, recomputed the pinned hashes, exercised the Task23 E2E slice, and checked lint/type/bytecode.

AdversarialVerify blocker: `ruff format --check` fails on the Task23-owned scope; 7 files would be reformatted.

Passed:
- Direct verifier: candidate `47a69e94d0847cc9db179064dd428172f825701fb824c6954291321eff31e01d`, manifest `d639558a344a37cbb3b9c811fe14501199b05af6126ba97b3077c017a461be3f`, wheel `9c2b57fc5c517bb3ffbdd925946e34e4015bf0986f91c93998cc70f00761f60d`, wheel receipt `d2991e1b3dc07415b20f5fb7c4e53aa994b8ed23ec4dbafc9aad6c2bf5bcfa5f`, freeze `55283bea0a65c327ca6b36c1d4ae8171ee7a653d26e0ddb2a7848e5e653bddc1`, paths `11`.
- Recompute matched: candidate/diff/status/member-index/two-epoch all true; wheel members `994`; profile package digest `3090dc7ca9e93236394dd4da88647b100ea70b22f00080950a24e1d254f575e6` matched from `59` leaves; import bound to `/home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/workspace/checkin_cli/checkin_cli/nutrition_onboarding.py` with API `2.0`.
- Task23 E2E/regression slice: `11 passed`.
- `ruff check`: passed.
- `python -m compileall`: passed.
- `ty check --error-on-warning`: failed with `254` diagnostics.