I read this as a read-only status check for Task23 - inspect the current receipts/state/logs once, then report completion or WAITING with the exact next user input.


I read this as a live status snapshot for Task23 - inspect the current evidence/logs once, then summarize the accepted step and whether the requested milestones are complete.


I read this as the exact Task23 evidence snapshot - inspect the redacted live executor files and the task record, then report the current step and whether the Q7/Q12 milestones landed.


I read this as the final evidence lookup - search the local Task23 logs for the Q7/Q12 progression, completion token/job counts, and delivery artifact totals, then synthesize the current state.


I read this as needing the latest Task23 run artifacts - inspect the freshest preflight/activation JSONs and the live blocker to recover the accepted wizard step and completion status.


I read this as the check-in transcript itself - search the Task23 evidence tree for the exact Q7/Q12 markers and the completion-request counters, then map them to the current step.


I read this as a question-sequence trace hunt - search the whole workspace for the exact Q7/Q12 labels and answer transitions, then use that to infer the live wizard state.


I read this as the current child-session trace - inspect the Task23 child log directory for the latest state transition and any redacted Q7/Q12 confirmations.


I read this as the actual wizard store snapshot - inspect the profile-local onboarding state files for the live step, generation history, and any saved completion request metadata.


I read this as the live profile store - inspect the session, ready state, and any wizard draft to extract the accepted step and saved-completion status.


I read this as the remaining counters/status - inspect the profile’s wizard and outbox artifacts for completion-request token/job counts and delivery artifact totals, with free text kept redacted.


I read this as a live-state clarification - inspect the latest inbound update, parser outcome, and current wizard step to decide whether `6` was ignored, rejected, or misapplied.


I read this as a parser-behavior check - inspect the wizard’s sleep-quality branch and its validation response to confirm whether `6` should reject or advance.


I read this as the exact answer-path behavior - inspect the main `answer()` flow to see whether invalid text advances, re-prompts, or is rejected without mutation.


I read this as the rejection path - inspect the branch where parsed text fails so we can tell whether `6` was a hard reject or a no-op reprompt.


I read this as the exact invalid-input branch - inspect the start of `answer()` around parsing so I can tell whether the `6` was rejected without state change.


I read this as mapping the invalid status to bot text - inspect the response renderer to see what the user should have seen after `6`.


I read this as a live wizard-state check - current state says `6` was rejected, not accepted, and the user is still on Q7.

- Current session: `sleep_quality` at version 6
- Accepted answers so far end at `sleep_duration`
- `sleep_quality` is still missing from stored answers
- Parser path: `sleep_quality` only accepts `1`-`5`; `6` hits `invalid_answer` and does not advance
- No acceptance receipt exists for `6`; state stays on the same question

Safe next input: `4`


I read this as a live delivery-debug check - inspect the newest Telegram update/callback receipts, gateway logs, and wizard binding state to pin the failure mode without mutating anything.


I read this as needing the exact failed callback record - inspect the gateway log and ingress journal around update `629525061` to see whether it reached the handler and why it stopped.


I read this as the final attribution step - pull the exact log lines around update `629525061` from the gateway/agent logs so I can classify the failure precisely.


I read this as a missing-latest-receipt case - inspect the task23 evidence folders for any redacted callback receipt or diagnostic tied to update `629525061`.


I read this as needing the failure classifier semantics - inspect the gateway receipt code for `blocked_receipt` / `handler_exception` to map the observed terminal failure to a concrete cause.


I read this as a read-only state check - report the live checkpoint, whether Q7 `6` was accepted, and the next safe input.

- Q7 `6`: **rejected** (`blocked_receipt` / `handler_exception`)
- Q12/save: **not completed**
- Current step: **`sleep_quality`**
- Next safe user input: **`4`**

Evidence: `629525050` recovery receipt, `629525051` / `629525061` terminal failures; live draft still sits at `sleep_quality`.