I read this as a controlled live retry execution - I’ll authenticate the exact callback, use only the normal gateway, preserve and verify retry state, then run the focused verification once.


I read this as controlled retry execution - completed with an honest terminal final-attempt result.

**DoneClaim: terminal**
- Callback: Telegram update `629525073`; message `141` `재시도`; owner route `8693203710/8693203710/topic0`; token `664046dbca210afc`. Callback-query ID was not retained, so none was invented.
- Pre-callback card was committed uniquely at generation 3; message `141` remained the sole owner-DM card after retry, now generation 6.
- Parent history preserved. Successor history: `pending -> generating -> failed -> pending -> generating -> failed`, attempts `1,1,1,2,2,2`; same request binding and no replacement token/job.
- Worker claimed the same token for attempt `2/2`; resolved `openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra`, schema `nutrition-coach-response-v2`, exactly one correction, validation audit `b99dbf...71f876`.
- Terminal blocker: `invalid_model_output`, non-retryable, attempt `2/2`. No draft/provider receipt/customer delivery; delivery count `0`; no further retry.
- Controlled restart changed PID `3222037 -> 3239197`; ledgers/card stayed stable. Gateway is active/running, reconnected, with two Telegram TLS sockets.
- Focused callback/retry/restart tests: `8 passed`.

Permission-sealed redacted evidence: `.omo/evidence/task23-st_019ff9e3/2026-08-13T155536+0900-owner-retry-final-attempt/task23-owner-retry-final-attempt.correction-v2.redacted.json` (`0600`, integrity verified).