I read this as a live recovery execution - I will authenticate the specified callback and prerequisites, then perform only the single permitted recovery path if they hold.


I read this as a gated live execution - the exact callback is authenticated, but the sealed post-fix journal has no valid consume transition, so I will verify that blocker and preserve the untouched authorization rather than bypass its CAS contract.


I read this as a gated live recovery execution - authentication passed, but I stopped at the sealed CAS-state blocker.

DoneClaim: `BLOCKED_SEMANTIC`

- Authenticated message `144`, update `629525075`, exact Owner route, journal, terminal parent `e2f07f9a41431ff1`, and prospective child `01e3b5d1739a5c49`.
- Retained diagnostic: `authorization_journal_has_no_consumable_state_transition`.
  The sealed authorization store has no `consume_authorization` operation; an in-memory `consumed` transition is rejected. Bypassing it would violate the required one-use CAS contract.
- No child append, provider call, retry, review card, customer delivery, Task24 action, or service mutation occurred.
- Gateway remains healthy: active/running, result success.
- Verification passed: callback 9 tests; transport 57 tests; generation/restart 7 tests; direct verifier passed.

Redacted evidence: `.omo/evidence/task23-st_019ffb07/done-claim.redacted.json`


I read this as an explicit implementation and live recovery - I will add the missing generic authorization-consumption transition with regression coverage, reseal the existing authorization without issuing another card, then execute the single permitted child path.


I read this as the implementation phase - the red tests exposed the missing transition and now pass against a recoverable, reseal-once consume path; I am adding the constrained live command surface before final verification.


I read this as the authorized live consume - the updated direct verifier confirms the exact callback, terminal parent, zero descendants, and zero provider calls; I will now quiesce the gateway, consume once, and restart it to run only the pinned child.


I read this as a fail-closed live-consume result - the one permitted attempt returned `Task23 compatibility consume owner authority is unavailable`; I will preserve the redacted evidence, verify no append/provider call occurred, and stop without retry.


I read this as a diagnostic follow-up, not another consume - the callback journal remains untouched; I will isolate the authority check under the same import path as the failed command to determine the retained failure cause.


I read this as closure after the fail-closed result - the failure occurred at the live authority guard before intent or ledger writes, and the post-failure verifier confirms the sealed authorization is unchanged; I will record the terminal DoneClaim without another consume or provider call.


I read this as a fail-closed implementation outcome - the CAS is implemented and verified, but the sole live consume attempt blocked before mutation.

- Focused tests: 20 passed; auxiliary: 57 passed; generation/restart: 7 passed. Ruff and ty passed.
- Live consume attempted once and returned: `Task23 compatibility consume owner authority is unavailable`.
- Post-failure verifier confirms journal unchanged, zero child descendants, zero provider calls, zero customer deliveries; gateway is active.
- No retry or provider call was made.

Terminal evidence: `.omo/evidence/task23-st_019ffb07/done-claim.redacted.json` (`BLOCKED_AUTHORITY_UNAVAILABLE`).


I read this as a narrowly authorized recovery - I will first trace the authenticated callback from its durable journal and callback projection through the exact live authority lookup, prove the mismatch without writes, then test and fix only that projection before one controlled consume.


I read this as the authority-projection fix - the read-only comparison found the exact split: Task23’s sealed journal authenticates update `629525075`, while the generic `owner-callbacks.json` and ingress receipt projections no longer contain it; I will add a failing test that makes the sealed journal the exact callback resolver without relaxing live registry or CAS checks.


I read this as the single permitted live retry - the new resolver proves the generic callback and ingress projections are pruned while the sealed Task23 journal resolves exactly one matching callback and the live registry matches it; I will now quiesce the gateway, consume the pinned child once, subscribe to its generation-ledger transition, and restart the gateway.


I read this as a second fail-closed authority result - the durable callback resolver passed, but the unchanged live-registry guard again rejected before intent or ledger writes; I will isolate that guard while the gateway is quiescent, restore service, and make no further consume attempt.


I read this as resolving the remaining nondeterministic guard - the same source module’s live-registry check is true while quiescent, so the callback data, route normalization, seal, parent generation, and current registry all match; I will compare the CLI’s exact constructed objects without invoking consumption to isolate the only remaining branch.


I read this as terminal verification after the allowed retry - the exact CLI objects now all match in a read-only replay, but the retry already failed at the live-registry guard before any write; I will preserve that result, verify the journal remains unchanged, and stop without a third consume.


I read this as final fail-closed closure - the controlled retry produced the same exact guard diagnostic with no stdout receipt, while post-retry direct verification proves the authorization and lineage are unchanged; I will retain the diagnostic and terminal claim without resealing, appending, generating, or retrying.


I read this as a terminal fail-closed recovery result - durable callback projection was fixed and verified, but the single allowed retry again blocked before any write.

- Exact mismatch: generic `owner-callbacks.json` and Telegram ingress no longer contain update `629525075`; sealed Task23 journal does, with exact message/card/hash/route/child bindings.
- Added durable `resolve_authorization`; wrong card, update, message, callback hash, seal, or child all fail. Focused tests: 21 passed; Codex transport: 57 passed; generation/restart: 7 passed; Ruff/ty passed.
- Read-only CLI branch comparison now confirms durable owner, coordinator owner, live registry, hash, seal, and child all match.
- Controlled retry still returned `Task23 compatibility consume owner authority is unavailable` before reseal, child append, provider call, or delivery. No third consume was made. Gateway restored active.

Terminal evidence: `.omo/evidence/task23-st_019ffb07/done-claim.redacted.json`.