I read this as a provenance audit - I will inspect the local candidate, receipts, manifests, ledgers, plans, and git history, then issue a decisive result and preserve a redacted Task26 receipt if the repository convention supports it.


I read this as a provenance audit - I completed the local review and recorded the decisive result.

## FAIL

1. **Critical - candidate is stale and unreproducible**
   - `.omo/evidence/dualcoach-candidate-manifest.json` declares `c160...`.
   - `.omo/evidence/verify-dualcoach-candidate.py` fails at `gateway/platforms/nutrition_coaching.py`.
   - 25/167 manifest leaves differ; declared Git snapshot is 986 entries/45,705 bytes, current is 186/9,516.

2. **High - Task24/25 receipts are not bound to the current candidate**
   - `.omo/evidence/dualcoach-task-24-evidence.json` has no aggregate candidate digest; two pinned test hashes differ from current files.
   - `.omo/evidence/dualcoach-task-25-evidence.json` and `dualcoach-task-25-live-terminal-evidence.json` contain no candidate digest.

3. **High - handoff/todo state is stale**
   - `.omo/start-work/dualcoach-production-readiness-handoff.md:8-11` says Task23 is next.
   - `.omo/plans/dualcoach-production-readiness.md:1027-1059` marks Tasks23-25 complete and Task26 next.
   - `.omo/start-work/ledger.jsonl:85` also names Task26 next.

Verified intact: ledger JSONL, Task22-25 evidence-index hashes/modes, archived migration receipt chain, Task24 receipt preservation, Task25 archive/cleanup, inactive service, and unchanged other-profile digest. Local git remains at the declared base with no subsequent commit; retained Task23-25 receipts assert zero push/release/activation.

Provenance graph:
`historical migration -> pre-approval freeze -> c160 freeze -> [BREAK: current worktree + Task24/25 receipts not bound to c160]`

Redacted 0600 receipt: `.omo/evidence/task26/provenance-review.json` (`d9fbaae7...`).


I read this as a provenance-repair implementation - I will freeze and inventory the current local candidate, build a successor manifest and receipt chain without rewriting historical evidence, update the handoff and ledger, then verify every repaired link fails closed on drift.


I read this as a hold on final candidate sealing during the security repair - I will preserve the no-go state, document the deferred reseal contract, and reconcile the handoff and ledger without computing or publishing a new candidate digest.


I read this as a sealing hold during source repair - I preserved NO-GO and prepared the deferred provenance contract.

- Updated handoff to current Task26 state: 25/32 complete, Task27 blocked.
- Added 0600 deferred reseal plan: `.omo/evidence/task26/provenance-reseal-deferred-plan.redacted.json`
  - SHA-256: `a8554f9e2c331d5a0e483f49d25ece7bb0017c024f5dd2902f897a82a090d4a2`
- Appended ledger hold event; JSONL validates at 86 records.
- No new candidate digest, manifest, freeze receipt, verifier, or Task23-25 binding was created.

Final seal remains blocked until `st_019fff17` reports `READY_FOR_SECURITY_REAUDIT` with stable source hashes and green gates.


I read this as a deferred provenance inventory update - I will inventory the isolated package and its reported build/test inputs, record only stable references and reseal gates, and keep candidate sealing blocked pending both required checkpoints.


I read this as a deferred provenance inventory update - the candidate remains unsealed.

- Added 0600 v2 deferred plan: `.omo/evidence/task26/provenance-reseal-deferred-plan-v2.redacted.json`
  - SHA-256: `5e215679b5b071cb6a7fd8ae715f46c93f43a338fa66641279b01c42409ca63c`
- Inventoried owner-v1 package, fixture, dedicated test, build script, initial closure report, and unretained initial wheel claim.
- Marked the scoped Task24/25 QA manifest explicitly non-authoritative for release provenance.
- Updated handoff and appended ledger event; JSONL validates at 87 records.

Final seal remains blocked until:
1. Quality: `READY_FOR_CANDIDATE_RESEAL`
2. Security: `SECURITY_REPAIR_PASS`
3. Trainer-free checkpoint: `READY_FOR_TASK26_SECURITY_READONLY_REAUDIT`

No candidate digest, manifest, freeze receipt, or final binding was created.


I read this as the authorized final Task26 provenance reseal/review - I will first authenticate the named candidate and all readiness checkpoints, then build and verify the immutable graph only if source is stable; any mismatch will produce a sealed FAIL receipt without starting Task27 or touching live/Git state.


I read this as a fail-closed supersession of c3b1 - I will preserve the security re-audit and observed snapshot drift in an append-only Task26 hold record, mark c3b1 non-authoritative in the handoff and ledger, and perform no further sealing or Task27/live/Git action.


I read this as a fail-closed Task26 supersession - c3b1 is preserved but non-authoritative.

- Sealed 0600 FAIL receipt: `.omo/evidence/task26/provenance-reseal-c3b1-superseded.redacted.json`
  - SHA-256: `eaf8a549476de00afa23cdf38f8f1730912445505391d138f5598728eb966a38`
- Added 0600 v3 deferment plan with all four security blockers.
- Updated handoff and appended ledger; JSONL validates at 88 records.
- No authoritative candidate graph, Task27 action, live action, or Git mutation was performed.

Next seal remains blocked pending a new stable checkpoint with `SECURITY_REPAIR_PASS`, `READY_FOR_CANDIDATE_RESEAL`, and `READY_FOR_TASK26_SECURITY_READONLY_REAUDIT`.


I read this as a final Task26 provenance review for the new candidate - I will authenticate the v2 checkpoint and stable source graph first, verify all requested bindings and lane outcomes, then seal a 0600 PASS/FAIL review without advancing Task27 or touching live/Git state.


I read this as a fail-closed Task26 reseal review - candidate `96e1...678e` could not be authenticated.

- Sealed 0600 FAIL receipt: `.omo/evidence/task26/provenance-reseal-96e1-aborted.redacted.json`
  - SHA-256: `7c0c25ba2f9d7fa102adbae0b6c40dfa9cfc4c3091a5fa370ceccd2f66da7c2e`
- The v2 checkpoint’s candidate root was unavailable at review time.
- Status snapshot drifted from 171 to 126 records.
- Existing Task26 lanes retain FAIL/incomplete outcomes, so no authoritative PASS was possible.
- Handoff updated; ledger validates at 89 JSONL records.

No immutable graph, Task27, live action, or Git mutation was performed.


I read this as a v2 provenance-stop and lane-action audit - I will preserve the aborted review and verify whether any command from this lane could have moved or deleted `owner_v1`, without resealing or advancing Task26.


I read this as a v2 provenance-stop and lane-action audit - I stopped the review fail-closed and preserved the forensic result.

**FAIL / NO-GO:** no v2 graph, authoritative PASS, seal, or Task27 action was created.

- The provenance lane did **not** move or delete `owner_v1`.
- A separate Task26 objective-review lane directly deleted it with `rm -rf owner_v1` at `2026-08-14T08:44:27.426Z`, after listing its files 14 seconds earlier. This was deletion, not a move.
- Preserved `0600` forensic receipt: `.omo/evidence/task26/provenance-reseal-96e1-lane-action-audit.redacted.json` (`b797...de8f`).
- Updated the handoff with the attribution and immutable-candidate gate.

Verified JSON integrity and mode; the v2 abort receipt remains unchanged, and v2 graph/PASS artifacts are absent.


I read this as a final Task26 provenance adjudication - I will authenticate the recovered candidate and v3 checkpoint entirely locally, then atomically persist a `0600` PASS or FAIL receipt without touching the candidate, Git, live systems, or Task27.


I read this as a Task26 supersession stop - I will preserve the v3 security blockers and mark e880 non-authoritative without sealing, publishing PASS, or modifying the snapshot.


I read this as a Task26 security supersession stop - e880 is now fail-closed and awaiting a new immutable checkpoint.

**FAIL / NO-GO:** e880 is superseded after security v3 found:
- `REAL_HANDLER_COUNTS_NOT_BACKED_BY_HANDLER_STATE`
- `ACKNOWLEDGEMENT_DOES_NOT_PRECEDE_DELIVERY_WORK`

Persisted `0600` receipt: `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-provenance-e880-security-v3-superseded.redacted.json` (`e5c7...6273`).

Verified snapshot manifest remains `c9fd...689b`, no snapshot mutation occurred, and no v3 authoritative graph/PASS or Task27 action exists.


I read this as a final Task26 provenance adjudication for candidate `2a0cd32e...` - I will first authenticate the supplied checkpoint and receipt against the local immutable snapshot, then fail closed before any binding tests if they do not name the same candidate.


I read this as a final Task26 provenance adjudication - the repaired candidate is fail-closed.

**FAIL / NO-GO.**

- Snapshot `06ffc1...` and candidate `2a0cd...` authenticate with sealed permissions; wheel/source, fixture/successor, installed entrypoint, and focused tests passed in disposable copies.
- Exact candidate lint fails: `F401` unused `typing.Mapping` in `contracts.py`; this contradicts the v4 repair receipt's claimed Ruff PASS.
- Task24/25 control evidence has a declared-mode drift, Task22-25 remains historical-only for `2a0`, and handoff/ledger plus all five candidate-bound Task26 PASS lanes are absent.

Persisted `0600` receipt: `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-provenance-final-2a0cd32e-fail.redacted.json` (`4e93...da6a3`). No graph, Task27, Git, live action, or snapshot mutation occurred.


I read this as a final Task26 provenance audit for the v5 candidate - I will authenticate the supplied candidate, manifests, checkpoint, lane receipts, and synchronization inputs locally, then atomically persist a `0600` fail-closed PASS or FAIL without touching the snapshot, Git, live systems, or Task27.


I read this as a v5 final provenance audit - it is aborted fail-closed.

**FAIL / NO-GO.**

- Fresh independent digest recomputation returned `a4447c...04b8`, not candidate `80700c...a2a6`; the stored dual-digest receipt is not reproducible from the sealed snapshot.
- All five v5 final lanes remain explicitly pending; handoff/ledger synchronization is only prepared, not applied.
- I erroneously invoked the source snapshot sealer. It failed on the sealed `0400` build executable but changed only permissions: `production-roots.json` `0400 -> 0600`, and two directories `0500 -> 0700`. No bytes, moves, deletions, Git, live action, or Task27 action occurred. I did not attempt restoration.

Persisted `0600` receipt: `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-provenance-v5-aborted-snapshot-drift.redacted.json` (`a274...a9c7`). No authoritative v5 graph or PASS was created.