I read this as a strict read-only Task26 release-readiness audit - I’ll read the active plan and ledger first, atomically authenticate the recovered snapshot, verify every listed acceptance clause from exact evidence, then write only one mode-0600 redacted PASS/FAIL receipt and stop.


I read this as a stop directive - I’ll preserve the FAIL audit and take no further action until a new immutable checkpoint exists.

## Bottom line

The `e880717f...` snapshot is superseded for final PASS due to Security v3’s semantic blockers. The existing redacted **FAIL** receipt remains preserved at `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-objective-constraint-final-audit-e880717f.redacted.json` with mode `0600`.

## Action plan

1. Keep the current findings as historical read-only evidence.
2. Do not modify source, snapshot, evidence, plan, ledger, profiles, services, Telegram, network, or Git.
3. Resume Task26 only from a new authenticated immutable checkpoint.

## Risks and mitigations

- **Risk:** Accidentally treating `e880717f...` as authoritative.
  **Mitigation:** It is explicitly classified as superseded; no PASS was issued.
- **Risk:** Advancing release review prematurely.
  **Mitigation:** Task27 and F1-F5 were not started; no live or Git actions occurred.


I read this as a new final Task26 audit of candidate `2a0cd32e...` - I’ll reread the active plan and ledger, authenticate the immutable snapshot without executing mutating lanes, audit every listed clause and open Task26 todo from pinned evidence, then write exactly one mode-0600 redacted PASS/FAIL receipt and stop.


I read this as a stop-and-hold directive - halt v4 adjudication, preserve findings, and wait for v5.

**Bottom line:** v4 is superseded. No objective PASS/FAIL receipt was created.

Preserved findings include the F401/binding drift and the independently observed candidate-digest recomputation mismatch. No source, snapshot, evidence, live system, Git state, Task27, or F1-F5 action was taken.


I read this as final Task26 adjudication - authenticate v5, audit every named clause read-only, then issue exactly one private PASS/FAIL receipt.


I read this as the authorized receipt step - the v5 snapshot authenticates, but the objective audit has decisive exact-candidate lifecycle and production-capability failures, so I will issue one private FAIL receipt.


I read this as a stop directive - preserve v5 findings unchanged and wait for v6.

**Bottom line:** Stopped. No v5 PASS was published; the existing v5 objective receipt is `FAIL` and remains untouched.

- Preserve provenance digest/permission drift and Ty diagnostic findings.
- No snapshot, evidence, source, plan, ledger, live, or Git mutation.
- No Task27/F1-F5 action.
- Task26 remains `NO-GO`; wait for authenticated v6.