I read this as an evidence-only acceptance review for Task26 - I will map every required criterion to candidate-specific receipts, then append the mandated final review receipt.


I read this as a supersession-driven Task26 review - I will verify the repair invalidation, record a candidate-specific FAIL/NO-GO, and require fresh human authorization before any new live window.


I read this as a supersession-driven Task26 review - I verified invalidation and recorded the required NO-GO receipt.

**FAIL / NO-GO.** Candidate `5e6f...b28f1` is invalidated by source repair; Task27 and F1-F5 remain unauthorized.

Key evidence:
- Repair invalidation: `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-post-launch-owner-review-repair-5e6f...b28f1/repair-receipt.json`
  `sha256:17fd0654060371b75e1673cb634ffbbbc3630c24913ab8377962b78bb0818200`
- Candidate manifest: `sha256:0422f192d187738dc5ff1faaf7dcfbc92c51b30c2d21b12c10438674d801dc08`
- Source drift: sealed controller `76212d...ba40a49` vs current `b30363...e556e13`; focused test `323bce...598bd` vs current `95300e...65bcdf`.
- No live invite: cleanup receipt `PASS_BLOCKED_NO_LIVE_INVITE`, `sha256:08fe1b6556e991c8f90fb4204fd63abe23d83917529c08e21b6da6d41930f414`.
- Gates 18-20 were retained but marked `INVALIDATED_NOT_CREDITED`.

Receipt written and JSON-validated:
- `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-objective-constraint-final-5e6f2f2a.redacted.json`
- `sha256:3592ba93c6488248591a7f4a51fbd047bc4bea7e2ea0863ee2a4101849710653`

Commands: read-only SHA-256 checks, NUL-status verification (`1294`, `ca1ce...95478`), and JSON validation. No tests, service/watcher actions, profile/runtime changes, Telegram/provider access, or Git destructive actions occurred. One temporary status file was removed.

`apply_patch` was unavailable on this host; I used the provided new-file write primitive solely for the mandated receipt.

Next action requires explicit human authorization for one fresh canonical synthetic invite window; no invite, card, launch, or Telegram action is authorized now.