I read this as a hands-on verification task - I will inspect the sealed candidate and retained evidence, enumerate lifecycle risks, then run only offline contract-preserving real-surface checks and append the required receipt.


I read this as an authority revocation - I will stop scenario execution, read only the latest cleanup and repair receipts plus current pins, then append the required FAIL/NO-GO receipt without touching runtime surfaces.


I read this as an authority-revoked QA closeout - I stopped scenario execution and recorded the required FAIL/NO-GO evidence.

FAIL / NO-GO. No lifecycle scenarios ran after revocation.

- Scenarios: P0 7, P1 5, P2 3; 15/15 blocked-not-run, 0 inconclusive.
- Candidate `5e6f...b28f1` is invalidated by post-launch controller repair; sealed closure has 2 current-source mismatches, including `dualcoach_tasks21_25_controller.py`.
- Cleanup verified: two windows expired, no prepared invite/owner review/activation/delivery; registry customers 0, cron jobs 0, delivery ledgers absent, gateway `inactive/dead`, PID 0.
- Retained Task22-25 index hashes revalidated: 28 artifacts, 0 mismatches.
  - Task22 `cc4ac126...`
  - Task23 `86b72c4c...`
  - Task24 `4df0f871...`
  - Task25 `c3c40ff9...`
- No service, invite, Telegram, provider, profile/runtime, product, or test action occurred after the update.

Append-only receipt (0600):
`.omo/evidence/task26/task26-hands-on-qa-final-5e6f2f2a.redacted.json`
SHA-256: `eaecbeb2db35761388fddb516adc3d32fa52dd78429b43ef296963209e32d721`