I read this as an evidence-provenance review - I will inspect the immutable receipt graph and read-only verifiers, then append one verdict receipt.


I read this as an authority override - I will confirm the repair and v6 readiness records, then append a FAIL/NO-GO receipt without retargeting any historical evidence.


I read this as an authority-governed evidence verdict - I recorded the repair override and final FAIL/NO-GO state.

- Wrote and JSON-validated `./.omo/evidence/task26/task26-provenance-final-5e6f2f2a.redacted.json` (mode `0600`).
- Verdict: **FAIL / NO-GO**. No current authoritative candidate exists.
- Authority: repair receipt declares `candidate_invalidated_by_repair=true`; this overrides status SHA `ca1ce270...`.
  - Former candidate: `5e6f2f2a...`
  - Repaired controller SHA: `b3036345...`
  - v6 candidate: `8536818c...`, explicitly not Task26 PASS; all five final lanes remain pending.
- Gate18/19/20 predate the repair; Task22-25 evidence remains historical and was not retargeted.
- A fresh canonical invite window requires explicit human authorization; no valid invite exists now.

Read-only verifier commands were run with `PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1` and `-B`; all current closure checks failed as recorded. No cleanup, product/profile/runtime/service/network/git mutation, candidate creation, or historical-receipt rewrite occurred.