I read this as a focused evidence-contract repair - I will preserve v1, derive an append-only v2 and receipt from authoritative static evidence, then validate without touching runtime assets.


I read this as an evidence-only implementation - the candidate-bound test, source, closure, and wheel all confirm the module is absent, so I will encode that absence without changing the existing checkpoint contract or any runtime asset.


I read this as an evidence-only contract repair - completed and statically verified.

PASS - READY_FOR_TRAINER_FREE_BUNDLE_REBUILD (not a Task26 PASS or candidate reseal).

- V2: `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-trainer-free-v1-acceptance-inventory-v2.json`
  - SHA-256: `3ce7f5b93ac9265cd82bb18a04cbc4363efa7d08e16a2810835980aa0d69b4d8`
- 0600 receipt: `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-trainer-free-v1-acceptance-inventory-v2-supersession-receipt.json`
  - SHA-256: `fa6a0d1de70a8496c6e0dbb9c008cc13bbbdefe7a9bd684317da686ebbe59024`

Exact changed JSON pointers:
- `/schema`
- `/recorded_at_utc`
- removed `/v1_runtime_closure/required_entry_roots/8` (`gateway/platforms/task23_portable_coach_successor.py`)
- added `/v1_runtime_closure/required_absence_controls`

The new control binds `test_legacy_runtime_modules_are_absent` and requires zero source files, import specs, wheel members, dynamic imports, and handler/entrypoint/references. All counts verified zero.

Preserved v1 byte-for-byte:
`31f1118c224285e7ddf82c2901c3885a2eda105d882f763ed8c113cd909eb56f`

Exact canonical JSON diff SHA-256:
`bc7348363b5820c68ad71794bf094ca101536013511ad8be3970f41510f956db`

Verified JSON parsing, 0600 modes, inverse diff restoration, unchanged 23-field checkpoint contract, unchanged 14 acceptance gates, candidate-653 pins, and v2-fail contradiction receipt bindings. Commands were read-only Python JSON/hash/static wheel/AST/PathFinder checks plus `json.tool` and JSON diagnostics. No tests, services, network, Git, product, profile, runtime, archive, or candidate changes; no temporary files retained.


I read this as an evidence-only DAG implementation - I will locate the architect contract and immutable 2e candidate evidence, verify every requested pin and tree invariant read-only, then atomically publish only the two authorized receipts.


I read this as an exact post-seal DAG publication - preflight passed for the 51-entry immutable tree, 763/763 indexed inputs, current verifier, zero absence controls, and no existing state child, so I will publish the checkpoint before its state-only child.


I read this as validation remediation - the published receipts and 763-index reauthentication passed, while the independent tree checker diverged, so I will compare its rows to the checkpointed tree before making any change.


I read this as validation correction - the divergence was in the verifier command's relative path after changing its working directory, while the tree rows exactly match; I will rerun it with absolute paths.


I read this as an evidence-only DAG publication - completed and verified.

PASS - `READY_FOR_FINAL_TRAINER_FREE_REAUDIT`

- Checkpoint: `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-trainer-free-current-candidate-postseal-checkpoint-2e0894ea.json`
  - SHA-256: `0a81424ed04ed0e36a8e7f9d7dc6f6a632a9328b9cf6914f1b64dfc7c9485b19`
  - Mode/nlink: `0600` / `1`
- State child: `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-trainer-free-inventory-state-observation-2e0894ea.json`
  - SHA-256: `c38cd25b397bbdd579838e6339967002b217175a59ff4ea42934611f207f97dd`
  - Mode/nlink: `0600` / `1`

Verified canonical JSON, 25 checkpoint fields (23 execution), unchanged v2 policy digests, 14 ordered gates, 51-entry tree commitment, 763/763 reauthenticated indexed inputs, zero absence counts, acyclic single-child DAG, and no residual publish temp files. No product, test, runtime, service, network, archive, candidate, or Git changes.