{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"running","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as an evidence-only implementation and live adjudication task - I’ll trace the claim state machine and v3 mismatch, add a separate append-only one-shot adjudicator with deterministic tests, verify it fully, then run only its read-only live path."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I’ve confirmed the v3 failure is a stale pre-claim invariant: its replacement helper requires `customer_user_id is None`, while the canonical atomic claim sets that field before the same handler proceeds through registration and consent publication. I’m now pinning the exact post-claim authority footprint and transition digests; any requested absence that contradicts the candidate’s semantics will fail closed rather than be reinterpreted."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The authority footprint exposes a hard contradiction in the requested PASS predicate: the candidate’s normal path must create one disabled registry row before transitioning `REGISTERING -> AWAITING_CONSENT`, and the live registry contains exactly that row. I’ll still deliver the requested fail-closed adjudicator and verification suite; its live receipt must be `FAIL` rather than falsely issuing `PASS_SUCCESSFUL_CLAIM`."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"write","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"write","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"write","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"write","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"write","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"Implementation is complete and the deterministic suite now passes. I’m sealing and running final static/compile checks, then the one live read-only execution; based on the proven registry row, the expected correct outcome is a sealed fail-closed receipt, followed by an independent verifier confirming that no false PASS was issued."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"write","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as completed evidence-only adjudication - the harness, verification, and live read-only receipt are sealed.\n\n**Result: FAIL — do not return `PASS_SUCCESSFUL_CLAIM`.**\n\nThe successful claim itself is proven, but the required “no customer registry row” predicate is false:\n\n- Exactly one disabled registry row exists for `task26_live_2e_r2_20260815_8527916639`.\n- Candidate semantics require creating that row before `AWAITING_CONSENT`.\n- No activation, check-in, generation, or delivery authorities exist yet.\n- Live authority fingerprint remained unchanged.\n\nCanonical transitions:\n\n1. `PREPARED/g1`\n2. Atomic claim: `REGISTERING/g2`, role claim message 158, `customer_user_id=8527916639`\n3. Disabled registry row created\n4. `AWAITING_CONSENT/g3`\n5. Owner-binding durable rewrite\n6. Consent reservation: attempt 1, `g4`\n7. Recovery reservation: recovery generation 1\n8. Receipt binding: card 159, `AWAITING_CONSENT/g4`\n\nThe v3 observer failed because it retained the pre-claim requirement `customer_user_id is None`.\n\nVerification:\n\n- Tests: `9 passed`\n- Ruff: PASS\n- LSP errors: 0\n- Compile: PASS\n- Independent verification: `PASS_VERIFIED_FAIL_CLOSED`\n- Preparation ledger reconstruction: exact `c7c53db4...`\n- Current ledger digest: exact `a9b73fcd...`\n- Raw token found only in the sealed private handoff\n- Existing v3 files unchanged\n\nEvidence: `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-post-claim-adjudicator-st_01a007d9/`"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"revived","payload":{"run_epoch":1}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as an append-only contract correction and live re-adjudication - I’ll preserve v1 untouched, derive a v2 contract around the candidate-required disabled registry row, TDD its provenance and downstream-absence checks, seal it independently, then execute only the read-only live path."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"write","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The corrected contract now passes its deterministic suite: the row is validated as the exact candidate projection, disabled and unconsented, while all downstream activation/check-in/generation/delivery authorities remain absent. I’m sealing v2 against the zero-row pre-claim receipt, both ledger states, candidate registration bytes, and the immutable v1 inventory before the final live run."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"write","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"write","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"write","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"write","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as a completed append-only v2 correction - the clean live result is sealed below.\n\n`PASS_SUCCESSFUL_CLAIM_AND_DISABLED_REGISTRATION`\n\nProven:\n\n- Exactly one canonical disabled registry row for the specified customer and actor.\n- Zero activation, check-in, generation, or delivery authorities.\n- Zero-row preparation baseline `c7c53db4...` progressed through candidate claim registration to current ledger `a9b73fcd...`.\n- Exactly one role claim, consent publication attempt, and card 159.\n- Service active with exact candidate bytes.\n- No raw token leakage or profile mutation.\n- All v1 FAIL artifacts unchanged.\n\nVerification:\n\n- Tests: 13 passed\n- Ruff: PASS\n- LSP errors: 0\n- Compile: PASS\n- Independent verification: 27 checks passed\n\nSealed evidence: `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-post-claim-adjudicator-v2-st_01a007d9/`"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"revived","payload":{"run_epoch":2}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as a read-only hash lookup - I’ll return only the requested relative file/hash pairs."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"task26-post-claim-adjudicator-v2-st_01a007d9/verification-receipt-v2.redacted.json  0097f86d07280f354a52f7453f684f7eb2f11fa9cf443dbfb5942d3d3fd9e41d\ntask26-post-claim-adjudicator-v2-st_01a007d9/live-adjudication-v2.redacted.json  95d614d0f0f36a94ccf920b58920e3ddff26bb78fd7a2eabcc719ffa0244e76c\ntask26-post-claim-adjudicator-v2-st_01a007d9/post_claim_adjudicator_v2.py  1ee766c54ee881c4b64dc55e5484bed4871024e7d513eec1c47bc7f631ed8889\ntask26-post-claim-adjudicator-v2-st_01a007d9/hashes-v2.json  16244181ae1befbdc4719e6d5a0441c34f78f2ed6d7daf07ddc2be9fd8473667"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"persisted_only"}}
{"type":"suspended","payload":{"reason":"reload"}}
{"type":"reconcile_reattached","payload":{"session_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/children/st_01a007d9/sessions/st_01a007d9/2026-08-15T23-54-42-891Z_01a007d9-654b-70d6-b8a3-e1393820ddfa.jsonl"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"persisted_only"}}
{"type":"suspended","payload":{"reason":"reload"}}
{"type":"reconcile_reattached","payload":{"session_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/children/st_01a007d9/sessions/st_01a007d9/2026-08-15T23-54-42-891Z_01a007d9-654b-70d6-b8a3-e1393820ddfa.jsonl"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted"}}
{"type":"evicted","payload":{"cause":"evict"}}