{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"running","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as a read-only design investigation - I’ll trace the activation checklist, its tests and fixtures, credential/profile safeguards, probe receipts, and candidate packaging, then return exact failing-first cases and a minimal compatible contract without editing or executing tests."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The source package is profile-local rather than tracked in the Hermes tree; I found an immutable candidate-v3 snapshot containing the same runtime, tests, and shipped-wheel tree, so I’ll use that snapshot rather than read the live profile."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as a read-only design investigation - report the smallest fail-closed contract, tests, seam, compatibility rules, and packaging impact.\n\n## Finding\n\nThe current gate is not evidence-based:\n\n- `_REQUIRED_CHECKLIST_ITEMS` includes `token_rotated`.\n- `_read_activation_checklist()` accepts it only when the value is exactly `True`.\n- Activation fixtures therefore assert rotation regardless of whether rotation was necessary.\n- The candidate-v3 Telegram probe already establishes most required facts, but its emitted v3 receipt omits:\n  - `env_sha256`\n  - returned username and bot ID\n  - before/after authority digest maps\n\nThe clean change is to preserve `token_rotated: true` as the legacy branch and add a strict evidence branch for `token_rotated: false`. Activation transaction, journal, audit, and nutrition behavior should remain untouched.\n\n## Proposed checklist contract\n\n```json\n{\n  \"checklist\": {\n    \"token_rotated\": false,\n    \"credential_hygiene\": {\n      \"schema\": \"activation-credential-hygiene-evidence-v1\",\n      \"rotation_required\": false,\n      \"reason\": \"existing_profile_credential_verified\",\n      \"receipt_path\": \"/absolute/profile/data/activation-evidence/telegram-getme.json\",\n      \"receipt_sha256\": \"<64 lowercase hex>\"\n    },\n    \"missend_test_passed\": true,\n    \"provider_terms_checked\": {\n      \"checked\": true,\n      \"version\": \"<CONSENT_VERSION>\"\n    },\n    \"withdrawal_deletion_doc\": true,\n    \"retention_backup_doc\": true,\n    \"manual_fallback_doc\": true\n  }\n}\n```\n\nThe accepted union is:\n\n```text\ntoken_rotated == true\nOR\ntoken_rotated == false AND credential_hygiene is valid\n```\n\nMissing, null, string, object-valued `token_rotated`, or evidence accompanying any value other than exact `false` must fail closed.\n\n## Typed receipt contract\n\n```json\n{\n  \"schema\": \"activation-telegram-credential-hygiene-v1\",\n  \"status\": \"READY_TELEGRAM_CREDENTIAL_HYGIENE\",\n  \"profile_root\": \"/canonical/profile/path\",\n  \"config_sha256\": \"<64 lowercase hex>\",\n  \"env_sha256\": \"<64 lowercase hex>\",\n  \"configured_username\": \"bound_bot\",\n  \"expected_bot_id\": 123456,\n  \"get_me\": {\n    \"method\": \"Bot.get_me\",\n    \"username\": \"bound_bot\",\n    \"bot_id\": 123456\n  },\n  \"consumes_updates\": false,\n  \"mutates_cursor\": false,\n  \"writes_state\": false,\n  \"authority_before_sha256\": {\n    \"config.yaml\": \"<sha256>\",\n    \".env\": \"<sha256>\",\n    \"customers/registry.json\": \"<sha256>\"\n  },\n  \"authority_after_sha256\": {\n    \"config.yaml\": \"<sha256>\",\n    \".env\": \"<sha256>\",\n    \"customers/registry.json\": \"<sha256>\"\n  }\n}\n```\n\nUse exact-key allowlists at every level; reject extra keys. Require lowercase SHA-256 strings and a positive integer bot ID, excluding booleans.\n\nThe receipt should include all authority files selected by the probe. Activation should require at least `config.yaml`, `.env`, and the resolved registry path, rather than accepting empty or caller-selected maps.\n\n## Required validators\n\nThe structured branch should validate, in order:\n\n1. **Checklist evidence file**\n   - Non-symlink regular file.\n   - Single hard link.\n   - Owned by the effective UID.\n   - No group/other permission bits.\n\n2. **Receipt location and integrity**\n   - Canonically contained under the resolved profile root.\n   - Non-symlink regular file, one link, effective-UID owned, owner-private.\n   - SHA-256 of exact receipt bytes equals `receipt_sha256` before JSON is trusted.\n\n3. **Profile binding**\n   - `profile_root` equals the canonical activation profile root.\n   - Current owner-private `config.yaml` digest equals `config_sha256`.\n   - Current owner-private `.env` digest equals `env_sha256`.\n   - Do not parse or load `.env` during activation.\n\n4. **Bot binding**\n   - `configured_username == get_me.username`.\n   - `expected_bot_id == get_me.bot_id`.\n   - Probe generation derives `configured_username` from the bound config and `expected_bot_id` from the token prefix.\n   - Config/env digest equality proves those authorities have not changed since probing.\n\n5. **Non-consuming behavior**\n   - Method exactly `\"Bot.get_me\"`.\n   - `consumes_updates`, `mutates_cursor`, and `writes_state` are each exactly `false`; integers and null must not be accepted as booleans.\n\n6. **Non-writing behavior**\n   - Before and after maps have identical keys and values.\n   - Required authority paths are present.\n   - Paths are normalized profile-relative paths without `..`, absolute paths, or aliases.\n   - Current config/env hashes still match their receipt values.\n\n7. **Token non-exposure**\n   - Strict receipt key allowlists: no `token`, `secret`, `authorization`, headers, environment dump, or arbitrary metadata fields.\n   - Reject forbidden key names recursively.\n   - Reject serialized token-shaped content, for example:\n     ```regex\n     (?<![A-Za-z0-9_])[1-9][0-9]{4,}:[A-Za-z0-9_-]{10,}(?![A-Za-z0-9_])\n     ```\n   - Probe tests must additionally assert that the exact injected test token is absent from serialized output and object representations.\n   - Activation must never load the token merely to perform this check.\n\nUse descriptor-based reads (`O_NOFOLLOW`, then `fstat`) where available so validation and reading do not have a symlink-swap gap. The probe’s current `secure_file()` checks metadata before a later path read and is therefore weaker than this requirement.\n\n## Minimal production seam\n\nOnly modify checklist validation in `checkin_cli/customer_admin.py`:\n\n```python\ntoken_rotated = evidence.get(\"token_rotated\")\nif token_rotated is True:\n    pass\nelif token_rotated is False:\n    _validate_credential_hygiene_evidence(\n        evidence.get(\"credential_hygiene\"),\n        profile_root=profile_root,\n        registry_path=registry_path,\n        checklist_path=path,\n    )\nelse:\n    raise CustomerAdminError(\n        \"G5 token rotation requires rotation or verified credential hygiene\"\n    )\n```\n\nAdd narrowly scoped private helpers:\n\n```python\n_read_owner_private_bytes(path, *, label) -> bytes\n_sha256_bytes(value) -> str\n_require_sha256(value, *, label) -> str\n_resolve_profile_evidence_path(profile_root, value) -> Path\n_validate_credential_hygiene_evidence(...)\n_validate_credential_hygiene_receipt(...)\n_reject_credential_material(payload, raw_bytes)\n```\n\nDo not change:\n\n- `activate_customer()` or `_activate_customer_locked()`\n- activation journal generation or recovery\n- audit writing\n- nutrition readiness or receipt generation\n- provider-terms validation\n- the remaining boolean checklist gates\n\nThe probe artifact needs a new receipt version because changing the meaning of the existing v3 schema in place would make historical v3 receipts ambiguous.\n\n## Exact failing-first activation tests\n\nAdd near `_activation_fixture()`:\n\n```python\ndef _write_credential_hygiene_receipt(\n    profile_root: Path,\n    registry_path: Path,\n    *,\n    overrides: dict[str, object] | None = None,\n) -> tuple[Path, str]:\n    ...\n```\n\nIt should create private `config.yaml`, `.env`, registry, and receipt files, with deterministic content and no network use.\n\nAdd these tests to `tests/test_customer_admin.py`:\n\n```text\ntest_activation_accepts_verified_existing_profile_credential_without_rotation\ntest_activation_preserves_legacy_token_rotated_true\ntest_activation_rejects_false_token_rotation_without_hygiene_evidence\ntest_activation_rejects_unknown_credential_hygiene_schema\ntest_activation_rejects_credential_hygiene_receipt_digest_mismatch\ntest_activation_rejects_credential_hygiene_receipt_outside_profile\ntest_activation_rejects_symlinked_credential_hygiene_receipt\ntest_activation_rejects_non_private_credential_hygiene_receipt\ntest_activation_rejects_non_private_structured_checklist\ntest_activation_rejects_receipt_bound_to_another_profile\ntest_activation_rejects_changed_profile_config_after_probe\ntest_activation_rejects_changed_profile_env_after_probe\ntest_activation_rejects_configured_and_getme_username_mismatch\ntest_activation_rejects_expected_and_getme_bot_id_mismatch\ntest_activation_rejects_consuming_or_mutating_probe_claim\ntest_activation_rejects_changed_authority_digest_map\ntest_activation_rejects_empty_or_incomplete_authority_digest_map\ntest_activation_rejects_credential_hygiene_receipt_with_extra_fields\ntest_activation_rejects_receipt_containing_forbidden_credential_key\ntest_activation_rejects_receipt_containing_token_shaped_content\n```\n\nUse parameterization for the three side-effect flags and permission cases. Every rejection test should also assert:\n\n```python\nassert json.loads(registry_path.read_text())[\"customers\"][0][\"enabled\"] is False\nassert not (profile_root / \"data/customer-activation-journal.json\").exists()\n```\n\nThat proves evidence rejection occurs before activation writes.\n\n## Exact failing-first probe tests\n\nExtend `test_network_probe_v3.py`, preferably against a new v4 module/schema:\n\n```text\ntest_receipt_binds_profile_config_and_env_digests\ntest_receipt_records_returned_username_and_bot_id\ntest_receipt_records_identical_before_and_after_authority_maps\ntest_receipt_requires_private_regular_profile_config_and_env\ntest_probe_calls_only_get_me\ntest_probe_does_not_consume_updates_or_write_profile_state\ntest_serialized_receipt_and_repr_do_not_expose_token\ntest_receipt_contract_has_no_unapproved_keys\ntest_wrong_returned_bot_username_or_id_produces_no_ready_receipt\n```\n\nReplace the existing timeout test’s fixed `0.01` timing dependency. Subscribe to an explicit cancellation signal inside the fake `get_me`, invoke the bounded timeout, and assert cancellation plus exact call history. The current test works by elapsed-time behavior and violates deterministic async-test discipline.\n\n## Backward compatibility\n\nMust remain valid:\n\n- Existing checklists containing exact `token_rotated: true`.\n- Existing gateway fixture writers using that legacy form; retaining at least one is useful compatibility coverage.\n- Structured provider-terms validation and current consent-version behavior.\n- Every other exact-true checklist item.\n- Activation journal versions 1 and 2.\n- Existing journal digest semantics.\n- Existing activation audit record shape and checklist path binding.\n- Existing committed activation receipt validation.\n\nDo not reinterpret historical `false` or missing values as acceptable.\n\nOne limitation remains: the audit stores only the checklist path, not checklist or receipt digests. Therefore this seam verifies evidence at activation time but does not make it independently tamper-evident afterward. Changing that would require a journal/audit contract migration and is outside the minimal compatible seam.\n\n## Packaging impact\n\n`customer_admin.py` is bound in three production representations:\n\n- `snapshot/profile-package/checkin_cli/customer_admin.py`\n- `snapshot/package-runtime-closure/checkin_cli/customer_admin.py`\n- `snapshot/shipped-wheel-tree/checkin_cli/customer_admin.py`\n\nThe production wheel member is also bound to the source snapshot through `wheel_member_source_map`. Tests, wheel bytes, `RECORD`, runtime closure, manifest entries, source digests, quality artifacts, and `candidate_digest` are all sealed by `candidate-manifest.json`.\n\nImplementation therefore requires rebuilding and resealing the candidate rather than patching one snapshot. `verify_candidate.py` itself needs no semantic change unless the new probe receipt is added to candidate inventory; its existing regular-file, mode, inventory, digest, wheel/source, and `RECORD` checks already cover the packaging invariants.\n\nNo files were edited, tests were not run, and no live profile, network, or Git operation was accessed."}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"revived","payload":{"run_epoch":1}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as a tests-only failing-first implementation - inspect the target test module, patch only it with deterministic fixtures and focused cases, then run the smallest new-test pytest selection and report the expected RED."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The target module matches the candidate-era fixture and has no hygiene contract coverage. I’ll add one deterministic profile-bound receipt fixture plus narrowly parameterized acceptance/rejection tests, leaving the existing activation fixture and tests unchanged."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"`apply_patch` is not installed on this workstation (`command not found`), and no file changed. I’ll locate an available patch helper before touching the test file so the requested edit mechanism remains satisfied."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"steered","payload":{"delivered":"steer"}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"No helper exists under the accessible system, home, or temporary paths, and the target checksum is unchanged. I’ll use a shell-local `apply_patch` wrapper over the system `patch` utility; it creates no helper file and will persist changes only to the requested test module."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as an immediate stop and restoration check - make no edits, confirm the target still matches its exact pre-task hash, and report status."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as an immediate stop and restoration check - no further implementation.\n\nNo edits were applied, so no revert was necessary.\n\n- Pre-task and current SHA-256: `0870962e2c42be238e9ddda4a309d7c527e1fd5e2a13f44c3f64858a68a4f72e`\n- File size and timestamp remain unchanged.\n- No proposed hygiene fixture or tests are present.\n- No tests, Git, production, live services, network, or evidence roots were touched."}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"revived","payload":{"run_epoch":2}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as checkpoint 1 only - add waiver-contract tests in the single authorized test file, run one focused pytest selection to capture RED, then stop before any production edit."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The production parser confirms the intended RED: it still requires every non-provider checklist item, including `token_rotated`, to be exactly `True`. I’ll now patch only waiver tests, preserving the file’s owner-read-only mode after the edit."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"Checkpoint 1 test patch is applied only to `tests/test_customer_admin.py`; directory and file modes are restored to `0500/0400`. I’ll perform static diagnostics, then execute the new waiver-focused pytest selection exactly once."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as checkpoint 1 complete - report RED and stop before production changes.\n\nPatched only `tests/test_customer_admin.py` using `apply_patch`.\n\nCommand run exactly once:\n\n```bash\n/home/cube/miniconda3/bin/pytest -q tests/test_customer_admin.py -k token_rotation_waiver\n```\n\nResult:\n\n- **1 failed**\n- **42 passed**\n- **85 deselected**\n- Expected RED: valid bounded-pilot waiver rejected because production still requires `token_rotated is True`.\n- Two non-test warnings: pytest could not write `.pytest_cache` due workspace permissions.\n\nCurrent test-file SHA-256:\n\n```text\n76e9e10435901bb20f9bfe2e44c0cd88a397471d3a74fbb922e12e288a64ed2b\n```\n\nFile mode restored to `0400`; directories restored to `0500`. No production, service, network, Git, live-profile authority, or evidence-root changes were made. Awaiting checkpoint 2 authorization."}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"revived","payload":{"run_epoch":3}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as checkpoint 2 implementation - add a small strict pure policy module, connect only the checklist parser, run the focused waiver tests once to GREEN, then run changed-file static checks and report modes, LOC, and hashes."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The minimum seam is clear: a 95-line policy module can own strict waiver parsing and mandatory binding checks, while `customer_admin.py` only imports it and delegates the `token_rotated` item. No transaction or audit code needs modification."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"Production is patched: the new policy module is 80 physical lines, strict/frozen/extra-forbid, and `customer_admin.py` has only the import plus one delegated checklist branch. I’ll now run the exact checkpoint-1 focused selection once."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The focused run exposed one strictness gap: Pydantic’s `Literal[True]` accepts integer `1` despite model strict mode. I’ll patch explicit pre-validation requiring object identity with `True`, then rerun the focused selection because GREEN is the controlling checkpoint requirement."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The corrective patch did apply; the nonzero shell status came from `diff`’s normal “files differ” status under `pipefail`, not from `patch`. The module is now 87 lines with restrictive modes restored. I’ll rerun the focused selection to establish GREEN."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The waiver selection is GREEN: 43 passed and 85 deselected. I’ll now locate an already-installed formatter/type checker without fetching anything; if none exists, I’ll use Python compilation against only the three changed files with bytecode redirected outside the workspace."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"An existing cached Ruff binary is available, so no install or network access is needed. I’ll run lint and format-check against exactly the three changed files."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"Ruff found no diagnostics in the new module; the lint failures are existing whole-file issues in the already-unformatted 5k-line admin module and test module. Format-check also identifies the new module, so I’ll inspect only its formatting diff and patch that file without broad reformatting."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The type checker likewise reports existing errors across the large test/admin files, while the focused module needs only three line wraps. I’ll apply those formatting-only wraps, then validate the new module independently with Ruff and basedpyright; broad-file findings will be reported as pre-existing rather than changed."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"Basedpyright found only local typing issues in the new module: repeated mapping indexing was not narrowed, the validated model result was unused, and `model_config` lacked `ClassVar`. I’ll patch those annotations/local bindings without changing behavior."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as checkpoint 2 complete - report implementation and verification.\n\nImplemented:\n\n- Added strict frozen Pydantic v2 policy module.\n- Legacy exact `token_rotated: true` remains accepted.\n- Exact `false` requires the exact waiver contract and all four matching top-level bindings.\n- Missing, extra, coerced, or incorrect values fail before activation writes.\n- No non-exposure inference or proof claim added.\n\nVerification:\n\n- Focused tests: **43 passed, 85 deselected**.\n- Initial GREEN run attempt found `Literal[True]` coercing integer `1`; explicit identity validation fixed it, requiring a second focused run.\n- New module Ruff lint: passed.\n- New module Ruff format: passed.\n- New module basedpyright: `0 errors, 0 warnings`.\n- All three changed files compile successfully.\n- Broader Ruff/basedpyright checks surfaced existing whole-file issues in the large admin/test modules; none were suppressed or broadly refactored.\n\nNew module size:\n\n- 97 physical lines\n- 79 nonblank/non-comment lines\n- Below 250 LOC\n\nHashes:\n\n```text\n40547c2934a3b2fb4f855443d110e2cde8340b14e4e26f23e0641d78520bf763  checkin_cli/customer_admin.py\n235a7ecdc881ea0bf216e2c77b8ae7457fc300323d6f4a152ae51e53e814a01e  checkin_cli/activation_token_rotation_policy.py\n76e9e10435901bb20f9bfe2e44c0cd88a397471d3a74fbb922e12e288a64ed2b  tests/test_customer_admin.py\n```\n\nRestrictive modes restored: files `0400`, directories `0500`. No service, network, live authority, Git, or evidence changes."}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"persisted_only"}}
{"type":"suspended","payload":{"reason":"reload"}}
{"type":"reconcile_reattached","payload":{"session_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/children/st_01a00b0d/sessions/st_01a00b0d/2026-08-16T14-50-17-154Z_01a00b0d-50c2-7ce7-bfe4-4ad347f0dad7.jsonl"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"persisted_only"}}
{"type":"suspended","payload":{"reason":"reload"}}
{"type":"reconcile_reattached","payload":{"session_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/children/st_01a00b0d/sessions/st_01a00b0d/2026-08-16T14-50-17-154Z_01a00b0d-50c2-7ce7-bfe4-4ad347f0dad7.jsonl"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted"}}
{"type":"evicted","payload":{"cause":"evict"}}