{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"running","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as a static incident-path investigation - I’ll trace the live Telegram check-in flow, activation refresh semantics, and pre-send failure surface, then rank hypotheses against the reported `handler_exception` without making changes or live calls."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The ingress is split between generic Telegram exception fencing and a customer-specific nutrition route, not the legacy owner bridge. I’m narrowing on the exact coordinator refresh call and the statements executed before the local send exception handler."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The current evidence rules out “restart required”: the already-instantiated coordinator fingerprints and reloads the committed registry on every ingress. The incident marker is intentionally content-free, so the exact exception is not logged; the strongest static gap is the first-time reply-keyboard send, which occurs before the card send’s catch."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as a static incident-path investigation - I traced the current source and correlated it with the committed activation and `handler_exception` evidence without edits or live calls.\n\n## Conclusion\n\n- **Activation does not require a gateway restart.** An existing coordinator calls `refresh_live_registry()` on every `_get_nutrition_coaching()` ingress and rebuilds routes when the registry inode/size/mtime/ctime changes.\n- The committed activation is present and valid-looking: the registry is enabled and the activation journal is `committed`.\n- Plain ASCII **`checkin` is not an accepted launcher**. Only normalized Korean `체크인 시작` and `오늘 체크인` launch the customer card.\n- The strongest `handler_exception` candidate on the accepted launcher path is the **first reply-keyboard publication**, because it occurs immediately before—and outside—the card send’s `try/except`.\n- Separately, the current profile lacks `data/owner-actions/customer-service-state.json`. That makes the transport gate fail closed as “paused,” preventing card publication cleanly. It explains “no card,” but by itself should not produce `handler_exception`.\n\n## Exact accepted text\n\nCustomer launcher recognition normalizes all whitespace with `\" \".join(text.split())`, then accepts exactly:\n\n- `체크인 시작`\n- `오늘 체크인`\n\nEvidence: `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:7489-7492`.\n\nTherefore leading/trailing whitespace, repeated spaces, tabs, and newlines between the Korean words are accepted. These are not accepted:\n\n- `checkin`\n- `check-in`\n- `체크인`\n- case or punctuation variants\n\nCorrection aliases are handled separately:\n\n- `오늘 체크인 수정`\n- `체크인 수정`\n\nEvidence: `gateway/platforms/nutrition_coaching.py:3193-3208`.\n\n## Exact live accepted-launcher path\n\n1. `_handle_text_message` extracts the effective message and runs onboarding/bootstrap/review reservations first:  \n   `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:13592-13612`.\n\n2. `_get_nutrition_coaching()` retrieves the existing coordinator:  \n   `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:13613`.\n\n3. Because the coordinator already exists, `_get_nutrition_coaching()` calls `refresh_live_registry()` before returning it:  \n   `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:4667-4676`.\n\n4. `refresh_live_registry()` delegates to `_ensure_live_registry()`:  \n   `gateway/platforms/nutrition_coaching.py:2312-2314`.\n\n5. `_ensure_live_registry()`:\n   - acquires the profile authority lock;\n   - reloads via `load_committed_customer_registry`;\n   - fingerprints the registry;\n   - calls `_configure_registry()` if its generation changed.  \n   Evidence: `gateway/platforms/nutrition_coaching.py:2274-2310`.\n\n6. `_configure_registry()` reconstructs enabled customer routes, registered `WizardService`, `PhysiqueCheckinBridge`, bindings, `_routes`, `_by_key`, event sources, and owned spaces:  \n   `gateway/platforms/nutrition_coaching.py:2240-2269`.\n\n7. Telegram builds the exact address. A private DM is forced to topic `\"0\"`:  \n   `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:5244-5261`.\n\n8. `nutrition.resolve(address)` refreshes again and performs an exact `(user_id, chat_id, topic_id)` lookup:  \n   `gateway/platforms/nutrition_coaching.py:2704-2707`; called at `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:13628`.\n\n9. For an accepted alias, `_send_nutrition_customer_card()` is called:  \n   `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:13629-13636`.\n\n10. It resolves the route again and obtains the customer key:  \n    `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:5790-5799`.\n\n11. The transport gate calls `customer_transport_allowed(...)`:  \n    `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:5800-5808`.\n\n12. That gate refreshes again, checks operational pause, enabled status, consent, 28-day plan window, exact destination, and safety hold:  \n    `gateway/platforms/nutrition_coaching.py:2551-2584`.\n\n13. The card prompt builds:\n    - opaque stable customer-start callback;\n    - program-day label;\n    - pause/resume control;\n    - inline “오늘 체크인 시작” button.  \n    Evidence: `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:5739-5780`; callback generation at `gateway/platforms/nutrition_coaching.py:445-455`.\n\n14. Before the card itself, `_ensure_customer_checkin_keyboard()` publishes a persistent reply keyboard containing:\n    - `오늘 체크인`\n    - `오늘 체크인 수정`  \n    Evidence: `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:5698-5721`, called at `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:5817`.\n\n15. Only after that does the card send enter a catch-all `try/except`:  \n    `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:5818-5831`.\n\n## Activation refresh behavior\n\nNo restart is intended.\n\nThe coordinator stores a four-part registry fingerprint at construction and compares it on every refresh: inode, size, mtime_ns, ctime_ns. An atomic registry replacement therefore triggers reconfiguration. Evidence:\n\n- initialization: `gateway/platforms/nutrition_coaching.py:2143-2152`\n- fingerprint: `gateway/platforms/nutrition_coaching.py:2182-2193`\n- reload/reconfigure: `gateway/platforms/nutrition_coaching.py:2274-2310`\n- ingress refresh: `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:4667-4676`\n\nThe profile loader also revalidates committed activation receipts on every load:\n\n- `checkin_cli/customer_admin.py:1982-1989`\n- receipt validation: `checkin_cli/customer_admin.py:1790-1914`\n- enabled-customer validation: `checkin_cli/customer_admin.py:1917-1926`\n\nCurrent state supports a successful committed activation:\n\n- registry `enabled: true`, written `2026-08-17 08:29:36 KST`;\n- journal `state: committed`, `recovery_required: false`;\n- transaction `4308149d8c04435583b708fea73a7a3a`;\n- incident update `629525116` failed at `08:47:23 KST`;\n- gateway had been running since `01:41:24 KST`.\n\nThus the registry changed while the gateway was running, precisely the scenario the live refresh handles.\n\n## Unhandled exception candidates before the card-send catch\n\nFrom `_send_nutrition_customer_card()` entry through line 5817:\n\n1. **Authority-lock entry/exit failure** during any refresh. The `with profile_authority_lock(...)` is outside `_ensure_live_registry()`’s inner `try`:  \n   `gateway/platforms/nutrition_coaching.py:2279-2281`.  \n   Registry loading and reconfiguration exceptions inside the block are converted to `False`, but context-manager failures can escape.\n\n2. **Fallback transport-gate call failure.** The first call catches only `TypeError`, then invokes the compatibility signature without protection:  \n   `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:5803-5806`.\n\n3. **Unexpected operational-state-store exception.** `customer_service_paused()` catches only `CustomerServiceStateError`; non-contract exceptions could escape:  \n   `gateway/platforms/nutrition_coaching.py:2731-2740`.\n\n4. **Current-date provider exception.** `current_date()` is invoked without a surrounding catch at the card layer:  \n   `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:5809-5813`.  \n   The normal coordinator implementation internally falls back, making this low probability.\n\n5. **Program-day customer lookup exception.** `_nutrition_program_day_label()` calls `coordinator.customer()` before its arithmetic-only `try`:  \n   `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:5729-5734`.  \n   That lookup refreshes the registry again.\n\n6. **Service-controls lookup exception.** `customer_service_controls_for_customer()` is wholly outside the prompt builder’s catch:  \n   `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:5760-5769`.  \n   It refreshes again and reads the pause ledger.\n\n7. **Malformed control-button iteration.** `tuple(getattr(controls, \"buttons\", ()) or ())` can raise `TypeError`:  \n   `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:5770`.\n\n8. **Reply-keyboard construction failure.** The persistent constructor catches `TypeError`, but the compatibility constructor can still throw:  \n   `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:5698-5703`.\n\n9. **Reply-keyboard transport failure—the primary gap.** Any Telegram/network/runtime exception from `_send_nutrition_topic()` escapes because line 5817 precedes the catch beginning at 5818:  \n   `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:5715-5720`, `5817-5818`.  \n   For topic `\"0\"`, this directly awaits `bot.send_message`; a disconnected bot raises `RuntimeError`, and all provider exceptions propagate: `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:5680-5684`.\n\n10. **Post-send set mutation** at `initialized.add(key)`:  \n    `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:5721`.  \n    The key is constructed from strings, so this is effectively negligible.\n\nThe outer PTB handler discards exception detail and records only `handler_exception`:  \n`gateway/platforms/telegram.py:11241-11254`. That is why the logs cannot identify which candidate fired.\n\n## Ranked incident hypotheses\n\n1. **First-time reply-keyboard send escaped before the card catch.**  \n   Activation introduced a new route, so its `(chat_id, topic_id)` was absent from the process-local initialized set. The first accepted launcher necessarily executes line 5817. Any provider/network error becomes exactly the observed `handler_exception`, while the gateway remains running.\n\n2. **The customer sent literal ASCII `checkin`, not an accepted launcher alias.**  \n   It would bypass the card/keyboard path, enter `nutrition.handle_text()`, receive the “submission only” rejection, and then use `_render_nutrition_text()`’s uncaught send at `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:6128-6134`. A send failure there also becomes `handler_exception`. This hypothesis rises to first if `'checkin'` is the exact submitted text rather than shorthand in the incident description.\n\n3. **Profile-module/provenance contamination during refresh.**  \n   The adapter only inserts the profile package path into `sys.path`; already imported `checkin_cli` modules remain cached: `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:4693-4705`. Earlier logs contain “nutrition onboarding module is outside configured profile,” so cross-profile import history is a real environmental concern. Most refresh failures are converted to a clean `None`, however, making it less consistent with `handler_exception` unless the authority-lock boundary itself failed.\n\n4. **Missing operational pause ledger blocked transport.**  \n   `data/owner-actions/customer-service-state.json` is currently absent. `is_paused()` raises when missing (`gateway/platforms/nutrition_service_state.py:72-74`), and `customer_service_paused()` fails closed. This should return `False` from the transport gate without an exception, so it explains silent non-publication but not the receipt marker.\n\n5. **Card prompt/control construction raised unexpectedly.**  \n   The unguarded controls lookup and iteration are genuine exception surfaces but use trusted coordinator types, making them less likely than the publication gap.\n\n## Best test seam\n\nUse `TelegramAdapter._handle_text_message()` with a real temporary `NutritionCoachingCoordinator` and an injected async `_send_nutrition_topic`:\n\n1. Construct the coordinator from a disabled registry.\n2. Atomically replace it with a valid committed enabled registry.\n3. Submit both accepted aliases and assert live route refresh without recreating the adapter.\n4. Assert exactly two publications on first launch: reply keyboard, then inline card.\n5. Inject a sentinel exception on the first publication and assert that it identifies the pre-catch keyboard seam.\n6. Parameterize ASCII `checkin` as a negative launcher case.\n\nThe existing ingress tests around `tests/gateway/test_telegram_physique_checkin.py:2474-2523` are the closest location, but they do not currently combine live registry replacement, the real transport gate, and first keyboard publication."}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"persisted_only"}}
{"type":"suspended","payload":{"reason":"reload"}}
{"type":"reconcile_reattached","payload":{"session_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/children/st_01a00cfb/sessions/st_01a00cfb/2026-08-16T23-49-10-623Z_01a00cfa-af5f-7e20-9e14-a065b9844d3b.jsonl"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"persisted_only"}}
{"type":"suspended","payload":{"reason":"reload"}}
{"type":"reconcile_reattached","payload":{"session_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/children/st_01a00cfb/sessions/st_01a00cfb/2026-08-16T23-49-10-623Z_01a00cfa-af5f-7e20-9e14-a065b9844d3b.jsonl"}}
{"type":"reconcile_reattached","payload":{"session_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/children/st_01a00cfb/sessions/st_01a00cfb/2026-08-16T23-49-10-623Z_01a00cfa-af5f-7e20-9e14-a065b9844d3b.jsonl"}}
{"type":"reconcile_reattached","payload":{"session_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/children/st_01a00cfb/sessions/st_01a00cfb/2026-08-16T23-49-10-623Z_01a00cfa-af5f-7e20-9e14-a065b9844d3b.jsonl"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted"}}
{"type":"evicted","payload":{"cause":"evict"}}