{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"running","residency_state":"resident"}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as: implement a strict-rerun legacy callback fix — stop dispatching `non1:` callbacks in the Telegram production gateway while keeping `non2:` and keeping `non1:` rejection fixtures under tests, TDD with a RED regression test proving `non1:` fails closed.\n\nLet me start by exploring the scope.\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"Let me find the `non1:`/`non2:` dispatch code in the source and the related tests.\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"Let me look at the exact dispatch code at line 11313 in `telegram.py`.\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"Let me examine how the runtime handles an expired/historical callback, to keep the fail-closed behavior consistent.\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I now understand the flow fully. Let me look at the test file's imports and the existing test helpers to write the RED test consistently.\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"Now I'll write the RED regression test, placed right after the existing (misnamed but non2-verifying) routing test.\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I'll add the RED regression test right after the existing routing test.\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"Now let me run the NEW test to confirm it's RED (fails against current code).\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The project needs its test harness. Let me check how tests are run (checkin_cli import path).\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"There's a `.venv` (python 3.12) that the repo uses. Let me verify.\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The repo's `.venv` has everything wired correctly. Let me run the new test to confirm RED.\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"RED confirmed — a `non1:` callback currently reaches the onboarding handler. Now let me apply the production fix.\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"Now let me verify GREEN on the new test, plus the existing non2 routing test and the historical `non1:` rejection fixtures.\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"GREEN. Now let me run the full closest Telegram callback tests: the entire `test_telegram_nutrition_onboarding.py` and `test_trainer_free_v1_contract.py`, plus the preview tests that reference `non1:`.\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"All 75 pass. Now let me run Ruff on both changed files and check diagnostics.\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The reason_code is valid. Let me apply Ruff's formatting to the test file.\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"`telegram.py` already had formatting drift (it's in the pre-existing modified set). Let me confirm my changed region is correctly formatted and the drift is pre-existing/unrelated.\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"My edited regions are Ruff-clean (the format drift in `telegram.py` is pre-existing and unrelated). Let me capture the exact diff of my changes and run the broader related test set to be safe.\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"Both files confirmed. `telegram.py` is tracked (pre-existing modifications + mine); the test file is a new untracked file on this feature branch. Let me show my exact production change.\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"Production change is clean. Let me run the adjacent `_handle_callback_query` dispatch test files to confirm nothing else regressed.\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"Let me confirm the observable stop: no `non1:` dispatch path remains in production source.\n\n"}} {"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}} {"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The observable stop is met. Here's the summary.\n\n## Intent\nFix the strict-rerun legacy callback handling: stop dispatching `non1:` callbacks to the nutrition onboarding handler while keeping `non2:` behavior and keeping the existing `non1:` rejection fixtures. Done test-first.\n\n## What I did\n\n**RED** — added `test_non1_callback_is_rejected_as_stale_unknown_and_never_reaches_onboarding` to `tests/gateway/test_telegram_nutrition_onboarding.py`. Before the fix it failed with `AssertionError: Expected mock to not have been awaited. Awaited 1 times`, proving a `non1:` callback currently reaches the onboarding handler.\n\n**GREEN** — in `gateway/platforms/telegram.py`, split the combined dispatch. `non2:` still routes to `_handle_nutrition_onboarding_callback`; `non1:` is now an explicit fail-closed rejection (stale/unknown answer `\"만료되거나 잘못된 온보딩 버튼입니다.\"` + `callback_invalid` ingress log) that returns before the handler, so it never reaches the handler or mutates state.\n\n## Exact diff\n\nProduction (`gateway/platforms/telegram.py`, line ~11313):\n```python\n- if str(data).startswith((\"non1:\", \"non2:\")):\n+ if str(data).startswith(\"non2:\"):\n await self._handle_nutrition_onboarding_callback(\n query,\n str(data),\n query_message,\n update_id=getattr(update, \"update_id\", None),\n )\n return\n+ # Historical non1 callbacks are expired; reject them fail-closed as\n+ # stale/unknown so they never reach the onboarding handler or mutate\n+ # state. Only the current non2 namespace is a dispatch path.\n+ if str(data).startswith(\"non1:\"):\n+ log_ingress_stage(\n+ \"validation\",\n+ getattr(update, \"update_id\", None),\n+ reason_code=\"callback_invalid\",\n+ logger=logger,\n+ )\n+ await query.answer(text=\"만료되거나 잘못된 온보딩 버튼입니다.\")\n+ return\n```\n\nTest (`tests/gateway/test_telegram_nutrition_onboarding.py`, after the existing `non2` routing test):\n```python\n@pytest.mark.asyncio\nasync def test_non1_callback_is_rejected_as_stale_unknown_and_never_reaches_onboarding() -> None:\n \"\"\"Historical non1 callbacks must fail closed, never reaching the onboarding handler.\"\"\"\n module = _load()\n adapter = object.__new__(TelegramAdapter)\n adapter._handle_nutrition_onboarding_callback = AsyncMock()\n adapter._handle_room_bootstrap_callback = AsyncMock(\n side_effect=AssertionError(\"room bootstrap callback branch was reached\")\n )\n adapter._get_room_bootstrap_transport = lambda: (_ for _ in ()).throw(\n AssertionError(\"bootstrap reservation was reached\")\n )\n historical = module.encode_callback(\n action=\"next\",\n generation=1,\n session_id=\"session-1\",\n ).replace(\"non2:\", \"non1:\", 1)\n query = SimpleNamespace(\n data=historical,\n message=SimpleNamespace(chat_id=-100),\n answer=AsyncMock(),\n )\n\n await adapter._handle_callback_query(\n SimpleNamespace(callback_query=query),\n SimpleNamespace(),\n )\n\n adapter._handle_nutrition_onboarding_callback.assert_not_awaited()\n query.answer.assert_awaited_once_with(text=\"만료되거나 잘못된 온보딩 버튼입니다.\")\n```\n\n## Compatibility concern\nOne existing test, `test_non1_callback_routes_before_bootstrap_and_generic_branches`, is misleadingly named — despite the `non1` in its name it builds its data with `encode_callback` (which produces `non2:`), so it verifies `non2` routing. It still passes unchanged and documents that `non2:` behavior is preserved. No other concerns: the historical `non1:` rejection fixtures (`consume_unknown_callback(\"non1:unknown\")`, `decode_callback` non1 rejection in `test_trainer_free_v1_contract.py`, the `non1:` preview test, the historical trainer-callback rejection) were left untouched and still pass.\n\n## Verification\n- RED: new test failed (`Awaited 1 times`) before the fix.\n- GREEN: new test passes after the fix.\n- Related tests: `test_telegram_nutrition_onboarding.py`, `test_trainer_free_v1_contract.py`, `test_telegram_nutrition_onboarding_preview.py` (75 passed); `test_telegram_approval_buttons.py`, `test_telegram_clarify_buttons.py`, `test_telegram_group_gating.py` (127 passed).\n- Ruff `check` on both files: all checks passed. Ruff `format` on the test file applied (a two-line assert join); `telegram.py` has pre-existing formatting drift unrelated to this change (my edited block is format-clean).\n- Observable stop confirmed: `grep non1 gateway/platforms/telegram.py` shows only the fail-closed rejection block — no dispatch path. No plan/evidence/config/service/live-state/Git touched."}} {"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident"}} {"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"persisted_only"}} {"type":"suspended","payload":{"reason":"reload"}} {"type":"reconcile_reattached","payload":{"session_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/children/st_01a00ed2/sessions/st_01a00ed2/2026-08-17T08-24-35-044Z_01a00ed2-8de4-79fb-9330-ec651f20917f.jsonl"}} {"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"persisted_only"}} {"type":"suspended","payload":{"reason":"reload"}} {"type":"reconcile_reattached","payload":{"session_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/children/st_01a00ed2/sessions/st_01a00ed2/2026-08-17T08-24-35-044Z_01a00ed2-8de4-79fb-9330-ec651f20917f.jsonl"}} {"type":"reconcile_reattached","payload":{"session_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/children/st_01a00ed2/sessions/st_01a00ed2/2026-08-17T08-24-35-044Z_01a00ed2-8de4-79fb-9330-ec651f20917f.jsonl"}} {"type":"reconcile_reattached","payload":{"session_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/children/st_01a00ed2/sessions/st_01a00ed2/2026-08-17T08-24-35-044Z_01a00ed2-8de4-79fb-9330-ec651f20917f.jsonl"}} {"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted"}} {"type":"evicted","payload":{"cause":"evict"}}