{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"running","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as authorized strict-rerun execution - I’ll inspect the sealed candidate and existing launch machinery, then create one append-only controller, dry-run it, and execute it only if every fail-closed gate passes."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The sealed candidate and service baseline are present. I’m now tracing the existing supported deployment, bootstrap, membership, observer, and cleanup contracts so the controller composes proven interfaces rather than inventing a parallel launch path."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The supported APIs can satisfy the requested pre-claim state without impersonating the customer: create one disabled registry draft, prepare one unclaimed bootstrap session, let gateway startup arm the membership epoch, then call the candidate’s read-only membership evidence primitive for actor `8527916639`. I’m implementing that exact composition with a durable “attempted, never retry” invite boundary."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The boundary test exposed a real state-machine bug in the duplicate-send guard; I fixed it before sealing. I’m running the corrected deterministic suite and zero-mutation live dry-run now; execution remains locked until both pass."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The final v3 source seal is `70e11e0f...`; 25 deterministic boundary tests pass and the sealed live dry-run reports `PASS_ZERO_MUTATIONS`. I’m executing the one-use controller once now; any pre-invite mismatch will stop the service and archive generated live authority without sending."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The single execution failed closed before deployment, service start, membership probes, or invite: the sealed controller process was launched with system Python, which lacks the Telegram runtime dependency needed while importing the candidate API. The one-use marker is consumed, so I will not repair or rerun it; I’m verifying the required clean rollback and zero-invite stop state."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as strict-rerun execution - exactly one sealed controller ran and stopped at a hard blocker with clean rollback.\n\n**Outcome: `HARD_BLOCKER_CLEAN_ROLLBACK`**\n\n- Controller: `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-strict-launch-controller-st_01a00f53/launch_controller.py`\n- Controller SHA: `70e11e0f44e58245701d525b51314189226b648806f7e619266de0bfcbd00fa5`\n- Controller seal: `SEAL-v3.json`\n- Controller seal SHA: `2e6ba8fb71d34d766082a08f59b8d8d704523fd3671cda29eb97aee8fb00be44`\n- Run root: `run-20260817-strict-a-v3`\n- Run seal SHA: `227de3df3854d8a2867a50697c21b405539d13edc1f27931024f97e1109154ec`\n\nVerification:\n\n- Tests: `25 passed`\n- Dry-run: `PASS_ZERO_MUTATIONS`\n- Candidate verifier after rollback: `PASS`\n- Service: `inactive/dead`, `MainPID=0`\n- Observer and journal monitor: stopped\n- Live customer authorities: zero\n- Invite API invocations: `0`\n- Invite message ID: none\n- Customer claims: zero\n- Activation/delivery/owner/coaching actions: none\n\nPrepared then archived lineage:\n\n- Customer: `task26_strict_a_20260817105246_b7ece5e4`\n- Session: `cb_RctzSPC_1shJlARXNjNp_g`\n\nExact commands:\n\n```bash\npython3 '.omo/evidence/task26/task26-strict-launch-controller-st_01a00f53/launch_controller.py' dry-run --root '.omo/evidence/task26/task26-strict-launch-controller-st_01a00f53/run-20260817-strict-a-v3'\npython3 '.omo/evidence/task26/task26-strict-launch-controller-st_01a00f53/launch_controller.py' execute --root '.omo/evidence/task26/task26-strict-launch-controller-st_01a00f53/run-20260817-strict-a-v3'\n```\n\nBlocker: the one-use controller was launched with system Python, which lacked the `telegram` dependency after gateway startup. It aborted before membership evidence, provider probing, or invite intent. The one-use marker is consumed, so no repair or rerun was attempted.\n\nNo first-user instruction was issued because `READY_CUSTOMER_CLAIM` was not reached."}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"revived","payload":{"run_epoch":1}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as an authorized v4 successor rerun - I’ll leave v3 immutable, build and seal a new interpreter-bound controller, prove all interpreter failures are pre-mutation, then dry-run and execute it once only if every gate passes."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The environment now proves the venv interpreter imports Telegram and both exact candidate wheels from site-packages, with systemd `ExecStart` on the same interpreter. I’m creating v4 as a separate successor with this proof as an absolute pre-mutation gate and with child-monitor cleanup fixed."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"write","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"write","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"V4 is sealed independently: controller `ea11d20b...`, seal `99c23436...`, permission `50e5a8c...`; 32 tests and both diagnostics are clean. I’m recording the real `/usr/bin/python3` zero-mutation rejection, then running the sealed venv dry-run."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The sealed dry-run passed with zero profile mutation and recorded exact interpreter, venv, systemd parity, expected import paths, and byte-for-byte wheel equality for all six authoritative modules. I’m now consuming v4’s new one-use marker with the required venv interpreter; any new blocker will trigger v4 clean rollback and no retry."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"V4 encountered a new post-start blocker at the read-only membership gate: the authoritative config has no literal `platforms.telegram.token` key (`KeyError: 'token'`), while the service obtains credentials through its supported secret path. Per the sealed policy I will not patch or rerun v4; I’m verifying its automatic rollback, zero invite attempts, stopped children, and restored clean baseline before sealing the blocked run."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as completing v4 once - it failed closed at a new blocker and was sealed after clean rollback.\n\n**Outcome: `HARD_BLOCKER_CLEAN_ROLLBACK`**\n\n- V4 controller SHA: `ea11d20bb4fc76b8775bdda8644970a758ee21a50fb31e15e484982f44a06d54`\n- Controller seal SHA: `99c2343645e5238568d1263a347587461d48edead1f3ce30aa9d804cee9b7c0e`\n- Permission SHA: `50e5a8c6f647459ff24987dfc27e9aaff538281cff230927ca4e0a06717cf384`\n- Run seal SHA: `8f9111b2ac21ac1ae1fb3f0af50bd1ff9b522e3db14cf1cf886b13cb2ab9f4b0`\n- Tests: `32 passed`\n- Diagnostics: clean\n- Dry-run: `PASS_ZERO_MUTATIONS`\n- `/usr/bin/python3` rejection: `PASS_ZERO_MUTATIONS`; requested root was never created\n\nInterpreter proof:\n\n```text\n/home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/.venv/bin/python\n```\n\nIt matched:\n\n- `sys.executable`\n- virtual environment\n- service `ExecStart`\n- service `VIRTUAL_ENV`\n- all expected Telegram, Hermes, and profile import paths\n- loaded bytes against both sealed wheels\n\nV3 bindings were verified unchanged:\n\n- Controller seal: `2e6ba8fb71d34d766082a08f59b8d8d704523fd3671cda29eb97aee8fb00be44`\n- Clean-run seal: `227de3df3854d8a2867a50697c21b405539d13edc1f27931024f97e1109154ec`\n\nV4 lineage:\n\n- Customer: `task26_strict_a_v4_20260817110035_478d9934`\n- Session: `cb_vo7kRkbf-J-jWVlOGMXjYw`\n\nNew blocker: after exact deployment, observer startup, gateway startup, and membership subscription arming, the read-only membership probe encountered `KeyError: 'token'`. The authoritative service resolves credentials through its supported secret path; no literal `platforms.telegram.token` exists.\n\nFinal state:\n\n- One-use marker consumed; no retry\n- Membership evidence not created\n- Provider probe not attempted\n- Invite API calls: `0`\n- Invite message ID: none\n- Claims/activation/owner/delivery actions: zero\n- Service: `inactive/dead`, `MainPID=0`\n- Observer and monitor stopped\n- Live customer authorities: zero\n- Candidate clean-state verifier: `PASS`\n- No source, candidate, or config repair performed\n\nEvidence root:\n\n```text\n.omo/evidence/task26/task26-strict-launch-controller-v4-st_01a00f53/run-20260817-strict-a-v4\n```"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"revived","payload":{"run_epoch":2}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as an authorized v5 successor rerun - I’ll bind v4 immutably, use the deployed adapter’s credential resolver without exposing the token, move identity/admin transport checks ahead of all live writes, seal and dry-run v5, then execute it once."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The authoritative production path is confirmed: `hermes_cli.env_loader.load_hermes_dotenv(...)` followed by `gateway.config.load_gateway_config()`, whose environment override supplies `Platform.TELEGRAM.token`; admin readiness is the candidate’s `verify_subscription_readiness`. I’ll bind those exact APIs and keep the resolved credential memory-only."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"write","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"write","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"V5 is sealed independently: controller `6092ac02...`, seal `04611ded...`, permission `ccf34963...`; all 35 deterministic tests and diagnostics pass. I’m running its network-free resolver-contract dry-run now, with profile mutation detection still enforced."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The v5 dry-run is `PASS_ZERO_MUTATIONS`: it proved the deployed resolver/bootstrap functions and hashes, confirmed no literal config token, and performed no network. I’m executing once now; credential resolution and bounded `get_me`/bot-admin checks occur before v5 creates its marker or any customer/service authority."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"V5’s sealed pre-mutation credential and Telegram identity/admin preflight passed, but the subsequent baseline gate found a newly present profile `sessions` authority before customer preparation or service start. V5 failed closed and consumed its marker; I will not retry. I’m verifying rollback, zero customer lineage/invite, and secret absence before sealing the blocked run."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as completing v5 once - it passed credential/network preflight, then failed closed before customer preparation.\n\n**Outcome: `HARD_BLOCKER_CLEAN_ROLLBACK`**\n\n- Controller SHA: `6092ac021c73987f8d0b065ff6e98cf32296aa72b7bf37ff7aed71c19e831e84`\n- Controller seal SHA: `04611ded095935757c829f1e2785e3b671489178b6b0052c97931f0b1d727c44`\n- Permission SHA: `ccf3496361ad4b591de3405a77b3e69323a0653070fd036bfee81176fd53ec88`\n- Run seal SHA: `ba8226e9e7cc036560070d43e2d90a4c7bd56345fc0dc2148ea1a69ba986b1f9`\n- Tests: `35 passed`\n- Diagnostics: clean\n- Dry-run: `PASS_ZERO_MUTATIONS`\n\nV4 bindings verified:\n\n- Controller seal: `99c2343645e5238568d1263a347587461d48edead1f3ce30aa9d804cee9b7c0e`\n- Run seal: `8f9111b2ac21ac1ae1fb3f0af50bd1ff9b522e3db14cf1cf886b13cb2ab9f4b0`\n\nSecret resolution and network preflight:\n\n- Resolver: `hermes_cli.env_loader.load_hermes_dotenv`\n- Bootstrap: `gateway.config.load_gateway_config`\n- Literal config token: absent\n- Credential resolved: `PASS`\n- Credential stored or printed: no\n- Secret-absence proof SHA: `1d67beea46c574c7ba99863c8574787ff71ebdc35c08ae4cf48131af1a0bafdd`\n- Bot identity: `8869235296` / `dual_coach_pilot_test_bot`\n- `get_me` and bot-admin membership checks: `PASS_READ_ONLY`\n\nNew blocker: the authoritative gateway configuration bootstrap created a profile `sessions` authority before baseline/customer preparation. The strict baseline rejected it and archived it during rollback.\n\nFinal state:\n\n- V5 one-use marker consumed\n- Customer/session lineage: not created\n- Service never started\n- Observer never started\n- Membership/provider checks not reached\n- Invite API calls: `0`\n- Invite message ID: none\n- Service: `inactive/dead`, `MainPID=0`\n- Live customer authorities: zero\n- Candidate verifier: `PASS`\n- No source, candidate, or config repair performed\n\nEvidence root:\n\n```text\n.omo/evidence/task26/task26-strict-launch-controller-v5-st_01a00f53/run-20260817-strict-a-v5\n```\n\nNo READY handoff exists because `READY_CUSTOMER_CLAIM` was not reached."}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"persisted_only"}}
{"type":"suspended","payload":{"reason":"reload"}}
{"type":"reconcile_reattached","payload":{"session_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/children/st_01a00f53/sessions/st_01a00f53/2026-08-17T10-45-36-305Z_01a00f53-a9b1-74ef-8e83-73f99be80fe4.jsonl"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"persisted_only"}}
{"type":"suspended","payload":{"reason":"reload"}}
{"type":"reconcile_reattached","payload":{"session_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/children/st_01a00f53/sessions/st_01a00f53/2026-08-17T10-45-36-305Z_01a00f53-a9b1-74ef-8e83-73f99be80fe4.jsonl"}}
{"type":"reconcile_reattached","payload":{"session_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/children/st_01a00f53/sessions/st_01a00f53/2026-08-17T10-45-36-305Z_01a00f53-a9b1-74ef-8e83-73f99be80fe4.jsonl"}}
{"type":"reconcile_reattached","payload":{"session_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/children/st_01a00f53/sessions/st_01a00f53/2026-08-17T10-45-36-305Z_01a00f53-a9b1-74ef-8e83-73f99be80fe4.jsonl"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted"}}
{"type":"evicted","payload":{"cause":"evict"}}