I read this as a read-only forensic trace of Telegram message 234 - I’ll inspect runtime evidence and installed dispatch code, report one-versus-two processing attempts to the lead, and stop as soon as that evidence-backed report is sent.


The repository root is an evidence workspace rather than a Git checkout; I found task26 runtime snapshots and polling receipts, so I’m narrowing to the newest debug artifacts and the actual installed package without touching the network.


The key state already argues against two completed attempts: the ingress receipt store is empty, while the bootstrap ledger contains exactly one role claim for message `234` and a single session transition to generation `2` at `00:46:51Z`. I’m now tracing whether one update can legitimately both claim and emit the expiry response through handler fallthrough.