message: 429: {"code":"INFERENCE_CAP_ERROR","message":"Error 429: You have reached your 5-hour Clinepass limit. The limit resets in 1h 21m, please try again later."}

stop_reason: error


message: 429: {"code":"INFERENCE_CAP_ERROR","message":"Error 429: You have reached your 5-hour Clinepass limit. The limit resets in 1h 20m, please try again later."}


last_error: 429: {"code":"INFERENCE_CAP_ERROR","message":"Error 429: You have reached your 5-hour Clinepass limit. The limit resets in 1h 20m, please try again later."}


I read this as a live, read-only ingress trace - I’ll summarize the update boundary, whether the click arrived, and where the evidence stops.

<analysis>
**Literal Request**: Determine whether the click on `입력 내용이 맞습니다` produced a Telegram update, whether the v6 gateway consumed/receipted it, and return the last update IDs plus evidence paths.

**Actual Need**: Confirm if ingress progressed past the workflow’s consumed boundary or stalled before workflow consumption, with exact log/state proof.

**Success Looks Like**: A yes/no on the click-produced update, the newest observed update IDs, whether gateway receipt happened, whether workflow `consumed_updates` advanced, and absolute-path evidence files.
</analysis>

<results>
<files>
- /home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/data/customers/task26_claim_20260818034254_d044b36a/nutrition-onboarding/transient/workflow.json - current workflow state; `consumed_updates` ends at 629525164 and state is `customer_attestation`
- /home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/logs/gateway.log - gateway ingress/receipt trail; shows 629525165 and 629525166 reaching ingress and polling receipt
- /home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/logs/agent.log - mirrored gateway journal; same ingress/receipt sequence for 629525165/166
- /home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/gateway_state.json - live gateway service state, connected/running
- /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/task26/task26-onboarding-package-origin-successor-st_01a01262/deployment/v6/receipt.jsonl - v6 deployment receipt ledger/context
</files>

<answer>
Yes: the click produced a newer Telegram callback/update.

Evidence:
- workflow boundary is still `consumed_updates ... 629525164`
- newer callback observed at `629525165`
- another later callback observed at `629525166`
- gateway logged full ingress + polling receipt for both 165 and 166
- 165/166 hit `validation` then `persistence reason_code=transition_rejected`
- workflow did not advance past 629525164, so the callback was received/receipted by gateway but not consumed into workflow state

No dedicated live-tree callback-audit file showed up; the callback audit evidence is the gateway/agent logs above.
</answer>

<next_steps>
Ready to proceed - no follow-up needed
</next_steps>
</results>