{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"running","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as a test-first source fix for the v6 profile normalization and redundant-clarification defect - I’ll locate the wheel’s authoritative source, reproduce the exact live flow in tests, implement the narrow boundary fix, and run the full requested verification without touching live state or Git metadata."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I’ve confirmed the defect spans the profile wheel package rather than Hermes gateway source. I’m now tracing the preserved wheel back to its non-live source copy and comparing package hashes before writing the RED tests, so the fix does not mutate either live profile workspace."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The source-to-wheel comparison is exact for the affected modules (`src-p` matches the preserved `fb48…` wheel byte-for-byte). I’m starting the test-first change there: one full 22-answer regression for `넵 남성입니다`, plus contract tests for canonical options, safe exact polite forms, redundant clarification suppression, and preservation of unresolved ambiguity/contradiction."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"RED reproduced as an import/behavior gap; GREEN focused tests now pass (49). The fix canonicalizes at both collection and clarification-resolution boundaries, rejects non-enum clarification resolutions before persistence, and drops only equation-basis clarifications when the stored answer is already one of the three canonical choices; ambiguous raw answers still retain ambiguity/contradiction workflows. I’m moving through static checks, compileall, and the full profile suite now."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as completing the test-first profile-source fix - the authoritative source is fixed, fully verified, and ready to reseal without deployment.\n\n## Result\n\n**RED**\n- Exact flow failed at collection: `canonical_equation_sex_basis` was absent, reproducing the missing boundary normalization.\n- Original preserved wheel: `fb48a1931828ee60ab3812faf795550bf4e672a54c56f78cd10dcf674c45560d`.\n\n**GREEN**\n- Focused tests: **51 passed**\n- Full profile suite: **705 passed**\n- Ruff: **75 Python files, all checks passed**\n- basedpyright on changed source: **0 errors, 0 warnings**\n- compileall: **PASS**\n- Added coverage: **22 parameterized cases**\n\n## Changed files\n\nUnder `/home/cube/.cache/task26-strict-successor-1786976146/src-p`:\n\n- `checkin_cli/nutrition_onboarding.py`\n- `checkin_cli/nutrition_onboarding_models.py`\n- `tests/test_nutrition_onboarding.py`\n- `tests/test_nutrition_onboarding_models.py`\n\n## Exact normalization contract\n\nNormalization applies NFC, whitespace trim/collapse, and case-folding, followed by an **exact 32-entry lookup**—never substring matching.\n\nAccepted outputs remain exactly:\n\n- `male`\n- `female`\n- `decline`\n\nAccepted forms include:\n\n- Direct Korean: `남성`, `남성입니다`, `여성`, `여성입니다`, `선택 안 함`, `선택 안 합니다`, `선택하지 않겠습니다`\n- Exact Korean affirmatives using `네`, `넵`, or `예`, with optional comma, followed by `남성입니다` or `여성입니다`\n- English: canonical values; exact `yes`/`yep` male/female forms with optional comma\n- Decline: `prefer not to say`, `I prefer not to say`\n\nUnsupported or compound text is not guessed. It remains available for genuine reconciliation during initial collection, but an equation-sex clarification cannot resolve until its answer maps exactly to one of the three enum values.\n\nCanonical male, female, and decline selections suppress redundant equation-sex clarification. Noncanonical inputs preserve both ambiguity and contradiction clarification behavior.\n\nNo live profile, evidence, service, Git, plan, or todo state was changed. Source is ready to reseal; it was not built or deployed."}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"reconcile_reattached","payload":{"session_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/children/st_01a01302/sessions/st_01a01302/2026-08-18T03-55-38-963Z_01a01302-b253-7b70-9afc-f30480cd64de.jsonl"}}
{"type":"reconcile_reattached","payload":{"session_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/children/st_01a01302/sessions/st_01a01302/2026-08-18T03-55-38-963Z_01a01302-b253-7b70-9afc-f30480cd64de.jsonl"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted"}}
{"type":"evicted","payload":{"cause":"evict"}}