I read this as an authorized one-invite production rehearsal deployment - I’ll validate the sealed candidate and clean baseline, reuse the proven strict v7/v6 launch path, send exactly one invite only if every gate passes, and stop at `READY_CUSTOMER_CLAIM`.


The clean-baseline service gate is currently satisfied (`hermes-gateway-dualcoachtest` inactive/dead, no rehearsal process). I found the prior v7 deployment and its fail-closed cleanup archive; I’m now binding that machinery to the new sealed wheels and checking every pre-mutation invariant before any Telegram write.


All read-only gates are structurally satisfiable, including the sealed module’s exact 30-minute TTL and the new unclaimed-identity requirement. I’m creating a profile-local copy of the sealed installed runtime, then the v8 one-use launcher/observer receipts; the launcher remains terminal-on-unknown and rolls back to the empty baseline on any gate failure.


The zero-mutation v8 dry run passed: exact sealed wheel origins and all installed `RECORD` entries verified, configuration is private, authorities/deliveries are empty, flags are false, the customer is absent from every staff route, and owner identity is separated. I’m executing the sealed one-use path now; any ambiguous Telegram outcome is terminal and will not be retried.


The single Telegram send returned message ID `299`, and the launcher reached `READY_CUSTOMER_CLAIM`. I’m taking one read-only terminal snapshot now to confirm the invite remains unclaimed, TTL/KST timestamps, one-send receipt cardinality, exact service PIDs, and unchanged activation/delivery authorities.


I read this as an authorized one-invite production rehearsal deployment - completed and stopped at `READY_CUSTOMER_CLAIM`.

- Invite: exactly 1, Telegram message ID `299`
- Customer/session: `task26_claim_20260818141513_0bca9c98` / `cb_YEsOMtCNC7x0ABo6lfN2eQ`
- Valid: `2026-08-18 23:15:13`–`23:45:13 KST` (30 minutes)
- Gateway PID `1153478`; event-driven observer PID `1153476`
- State: `PREPARED`; activation/delivery remain false
- Evidence: `deployment/v8/READY_CUSTOMER_CLAIM.json`

**Open latest Telegram message ID 299 and tap Start only.**


I read this as an explicitly authorized one-time replacement for expired message `299` - I’ll first prove the old token is expired and unclaimed using read-only state, then use the sealed v8 runtime’s canonical expiry/cleanup path and strict one-use machinery to send exactly one fresh invite, stopping again at `READY_CUSTOMER_CLAIM`.


The old record is conclusively expired: message `299`’s session remained unclaimed (`PREPARED`, no role claims, no customer claim identity, activation/delivery false) past `23:45:13 KST`; the sealed claim path first canonicalizes such a session to `EXPIRED` and rejects every non-`PREPARED` token. I’m preserving that read-only proof, then applying `expire_unbound()` and the prior strict launcher’s supported rollback cleanup before creating the replacement.


The canonical expiry succeeded and both obsolete v8 services are now inactive/dead. The supported rollback moved the old authorities into the sealed v8 rollback archive, but its final baseline append was blocked by a false-positive process match against the invoking shell; no Telegram write occurred. I’m durably recording the independently verified clean result, then launching a separately one-use `resend-1` receipt on the same `f32a…` candidate—never a historical candidate.


The replacement dry run passed on the same latest sealed candidate `f32a8365…`: old message/session evidence is archived as `EXPIRED`, obsolete gateway/observer PIDs are zero, live authorities are empty, exact wheel `RECORD` parity is intact, and no historical candidate appears in the replacement binding. I’m performing the single authorized replacement send now.


The replacement send returned Telegram message ID `300` and reached `READY_CUSTOMER_CLAIM`. I’m writing one combined durable receipt that binds the old `299` expiry/cleanup proofs to the new one-send receipt, sealed candidate hashes, current PREPARED state, service PIDs, and unchanged activation/delivery flags; no plan status or review-lane ledger will be changed.


I read this as completing the authorized replacement invite - done, with durable Task26 evidence and no review-lane progression.

`READY_CUSTOMER_CLAIM`

- Fresh Telegram message ID: `300`
- Customer: `task26_claim_20260818145508_1b96b23d`
- Session: `cb_mYUoMIsk_CRzSDKYpPE9dg`
- Validity: `2026-08-18 23:55:08` to `2026-08-19 00:25:08 KST`
- Gateway PID: `1170032`
- Observer PID: `1170030`
- Activation/delivery/delivery-enabled: all `false`
- Candidate: `f32a836571b403663da3510d930fd04c1a84c5514cb6345fc575f5a42b580da5`

Old message `299` is canonically `EXPIRED`, unclaimed, unusable, and archived. Its obsolete gateway/observer are inactive with PID `0`. Exactly one replacement intent and one successful send were recorded.

Durable receipt:

`/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/task26/task26-clarification-root-final-st_01a013d9/deployment/v8/resend-1/READY_CUSTOMER_CLAIM_REPLACEMENT.json`

SHA-256: `7c056e3e7bba46457e194c501122e17b0f823187b96e55c317231fcefe4ea928`

Replacement ledger SHA-256: `6f1aab6ba90e9536f6f5e1f394f20554f16d91c3a425b6719d70f098be56033a`

**Open latest Telegram message ID 300 and tap Start only.**


I read this as Task26 observation-only continuation for replacement message `300` - I’ll verify the existing event-driven observer binding, inspect the committed onboarding cursor without Telegram calls or mutation, and return only at the current durable boundary or exact human handoff.


I read this as observation-only Task26 continuation - a durable human handoff is now committed.

- Current message: `354`
- Stage: `customer_attestation`
- Cursor/answers: `22/22` committed
- Prior deterministic clarifications: messages `348`, `350`, `352`
- Current clarification: none
- Activation/delivery/customer enabled: all `false`
- Gateway/observer PIDs: `1170032` / `1170030`

**Next human action:** On message `354`, tap **입력 내용이 맞습니다**.

Evidence:
`/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/task26/task26-clarification-root-final-st_01a013d9/deployment/v8/resend-1/observations/stage-customer-attestation-message-354.json`

SHA-256: `50fa768e76100f687b4d8414e03f8ac52bb148fa4f9505e5389106169e028f51`


I read this as an immediate deterministic Task26 failure - I’ll preserve the committed live state and candidate-bound clarification evidence without Telegram/state actions, identify the strict amendment’s exact abort/archive boundary, and prevent any progression into summary confirmation, owner review, or activation.


The violation is machine-confirmed at committed customer messages `348`/`350` (`activity_category`) and `352` (`goal_type`), followed by unconfirmed summary message `354`. The run is still safely pre-activation: cursor `22`, answers `22`, customer disabled, all activation/delivery flags false. I’m freezing a private evidence archive at this boundary and stopping the gateway and observer—no summary click, Telegram call, replay, repair, recovery, or profile-state cleanup.


I read this as a strict-amendment abort - the failed live run is frozen and archived.

**Abort/archive boundary**

- Failure: deterministic unexpected clarification for clear Korean input `보통 수준`
- Clarification messages:
  - `348`, `350`: `activity_category`
  - `352`: `goal_type`
- Unconfirmed summary: message `354`, generation `26`
- Committed cursor/answers: `22/22`
- Candidate: `f32a836571b403663da3510d930fd04c1a84c5514cb6345fc575f5a42b580da5`
- Product: `5795a78f7830760b10a4b4d909ca44b9142b92e86083d7d47e9c787f5e580d97`
- Customer enabled/activation/delivery/delivery-enabled: all `false`
- Owner-service states: `0`
- Summary confirmations, replay, recovery, repair, publication, and state mutation: `0`
- Gateway and observer: stopped, `inactive/dead`, PID `0`
- Task26: not complete
- Task27 and review lanes: not started

Receipt:
`/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/task26/task26-clarification-root-final-st_01a013d9/deployment/v8/resend-1/abort-clarification-root-natural-korean/ABORT_ARCHIVE_BOUNDARY.json`

SHA-256: `eb2524e1811bbe6b2f0d2a413bf83e1501f3d779f7b4babd82f9cf752af00e73`

Exact boundary: **preserve the failed run; do not confirm message `354` or perform further customer/owner actions. Any replacement requires a separately sealed candidate and separately authorized fresh run.**