I read this as a read-only forensic reconstruction - I’ll inventory and hash the durable Task26 artifacts, trace messages 348/350/352 through inputs, IDs, parser results, and decisions, then judge them against the plan amendment.


The archive proves three committed clarification prompts; I’m now decoding the workflow and bootstrap authorities to bind each prompt to the exact inbound text and parser/reconciliation decision, rather than relying only on the failure summary.


The transition itself is durable, but the archive does not retain raw inbound Telegram text. I’m doing one final hash-based reconstruction of the rendered clarification bodies and parser outputs to separate what is exactly provable from what would require the missing ingress artifact.


I read this as completed read-only forensics - the durable artifacts prove the live clarification transition and the first clarification already fails acceptance.

## State reconstruction

| Bot msg | Input state causing prompt | Parser result | Clarification decision | Reply and next state | Unnecessary under amendment? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| `348`, gen 23 | Activity stored as `보통 활동량`; goal stored as `체중 유지` | Both remained literal strings, not canonical enums | `activity_category`, issue `7e1be7…9d3f`; prompt `(1/2)` | Reply normalized to `보통 수준`; still noncanonical, producing `350` | **Yes** |
| `350`, gen 24 | `보통 수준`; goal still `체중 유지` | `보통 수준` remained literal, not `moderate` | `activity_category`, issue `2c3e1d…3840`; same `(1/2)` prompt | Reply `보통` parsed as `moderate`, producing `352` | **Yes, definitively** |
| `352`, gen 25 | Activity `moderate`; goal still `체중 유지` | `체중 유지` remained literal, not `maintain` | `goal_type`, issue `afe43e…381`; prompt `(1/1)` | Reply `유지` parsed as `maintain`; summary `354` followed | **Yes** |

The intermediate answer maps are cryptographically identified by matching their canonical JSON digests:

- `보통 활동량` + `체중 유지` -> `d6015fbf…0044` (`348`)
- `보통 수준` + `체중 유지` -> `58f00f27…6a62` (`350`)
- `moderate` + `체중 유지` -> `0e801f18…f1ec` (`352`)
- `moderate` + `maintain` -> `a39a2040…91f3` (`354`)

### Exact rendered prompts

Messages `348` and `350`, body SHA-256 `3f7365bf…6e51`:

```text
입력 내용을 정확히 반영하려고 한 가지만 더 확인할게요. (1/2)

활동 수준을 한 가지로 입력해 주세요.

답변 형식: 활동 수준: 좌식 / 가벼움 / 보통 / 매우 활동적 / 최고 활동
이 메시지에 답장해 주세요.
```

Message `352`, body SHA-256 `8727894a…7b52`:

```text
입력 내용을 정확히 반영하려고 한 가지만 더 확인할게요. (1/1)

목표를 감량, 유지, 증량 중 하나로 입력해 주세요.

답변 형식: 목표를 입력해 주세요: 감량 / 유지 / 증량
이 메시지에 답장해 주세요.
```

## Acceptance judgment

**The zero-issue one-pass acceptance is already invalidated by message `348`; message `350` independently and conclusively invalidates it again.** The amendment required clear natural Korean variants not to require canonical-token rewording. `352` is the same defect for `체중 유지`.

The archived final state confirms three clarifications, summary `354` unconfirmed, cursor/answers `22/22`, and no activation, delivery, owner review, or customer enablement.

## Primary durable evidence

- `abort-clarification-root-natural-korean/archive/publication_outbox.bin`
  SHA-256 `0d79c3e461a0401265d3033b364eb8ec4323b5614386693231d003c7b312a947`
- `abort-clarification-root-natural-korean/archive/workflow.bin`
  SHA-256 `5fc1516f81f3ab79f7627283d8981bb8bec12113ef02032515646d097a9388c5`
- `abort-clarification-root-natural-korean/failure-prestop.json`
  SHA-256 `8893787b7a25b8642050d9da67596e1e0801212e250263598d2735aaa3dd1b9e`
- `abort-clarification-root-natural-korean/ABORT_ARCHIVE_BOUNDARY.json`
  SHA-256 `eb2524e1811bbe6b2f0d2a413bf83e1501f3d779f7b4babd82f9cf752af00e73`
- Sealed Hermes wheel used to reconstruct parser/rendering behavior
  SHA-256 `c673e7b04c564e6ebbf5010e6e0ad321af3abde7565d6d3ca66d238c9248877`
- Sealed profile wheel containing clarification policy
  SHA-256 `aba7b92da1de6b9f9e071f8734026683c7bcdfd1abaa754ab2c8b6b4d5825fd7`

## Exact missing artifact

The archive does **not** retain raw inbound Telegram updates or inbound Telegram message IDs. Therefore whitespace-exact raw text and the presumed inbound IDs `347/349/351/353` are not durably provable. The missing artifact is the session’s raw Telegram ingress/update receipt, previously referenced as:

`/home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/data/telegram-ingress-receipts-v1-d0aacf0f4bdbb7c0.json`

It was not copied into the abort archive. The normalized parser inputs and all bot prompt IDs/outcomes above are nevertheless proven by the archived answer and body digests.


I read this as a compact evidence ruling - table only, with no changes.

| Bot msg | Field | Immediately preceding input / archived answer | Prompt status | Durable proof |
|---:|---|---|---|---|
| 348 | `activity_category` | `보통 활동량` | First clarification | `.../abort-clarification-root-natural-korean/archive/publication_outbox.bin` + `.../archive/workflow.bin` |
| 350 | `activity_category` | `보통 수준` | Re-ask | `.../abort-clarification-root-natural-korean/archive/publication_outbox.bin` + `.../failure-prestop.json` |
| 352 | `goal_type` | `체중 유지` — not archived as `현재 체중을 유지하고 싶습니다.` | First clarification, not re-ask | `.../abort-clarification-root-natural-korean/archive/publication_outbox.bin` + `.../archive/workflow.bin` |