{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"running","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as a read-only F4 real-surface evidence audit - I’ll trace the full Task22-27 evidence graph, independently verify every binding/hash/action claim against candidate `d110…9112`, and return a decisive adjudication with no external or mutating actions."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The authoritative lane is now identified: delivered v38 plus its postfreeze receipts and Task27 cleanup. I’m narrowing the audit to the plan’s exact F4 clauses and the immutable historical Task22-25 objects referenced by v38, rather than treating copied offline QA as new Telegram execution."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The evidence separates two claims correctly: Task22-25 supplies historical real-network proof; v38 supplies candidate-bound offline/loopback qualification. I’m now validating the cross-bindings byte-for-byte and resolving the remaining identity tuple (customer/owner route, card, generation, capability, delivery receipt) from retained immutable records, not from summary prose."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as a read-only F4 real-surface evidence audit - I traced the historical Telegram lifecycle, v38 bindings, and Task27 cleanup without external or mutating action.\n\n# F4 verdict: PASS\n\n**Confidence: 0.96**\n\nThe evidence supports one historical real-Telegram happy path on the intended private customer and owner/operator surfaces. Candidate v38 does **not** falsely claim that historical execution as its own; its offline and loopback qualification legitimately complements that proof.\n\n## Cross-binding matrix\n\n| Claim | Bound evidence |\n|---|---|\n| Customer private DM | user/chat `8527916639`, topic `0`, customer `task22_dm_rehearsal` |\n| Owner private DM | user/chat `8693203710`, topic `0` |\n| Owner onboarding approval | session `rb_f4L9siIlDP-R6IF27GwxdA`, update `629525053`, message `126`, generation `29` |\n| Check-in | session `6f31a1da4bea79f91675feffca5ffbeb`, event `wizard_995f04a3b8bc256fa13ff407`, revision `f266949e…f117ae1` |\n| Final owner card | token/draft `c8eab7b6685c3c65`, message `156`, route `8693203710/8693203710/0`, approved generation `4` |\n| Explicit send | accepted event `pilot_98dfe3a55ae098d313aa03d0`; approval preceded send by about 8m29s |\n| Customer delivery | exactly one row, chat `8527916639`, topic `0`, provider message `157`, `sent_audited` |\n| Terminal generation | generation `7`, receipt `157`, record `f1ced618…3a596b` |\n| Duplicate protection | stale/repeat/wrong-role: zero sends and mutations; one post-send restart, duplicate count zero |\n| Historical capability | Pre-capability legacy execution; no capability ID is falsely invented |\n| v38 source capability | `ec953b56…0b65f3`, owner `100`, customer `200`, card `700`, generation `4`, message `9001`, consumed |\n| v38 installed capability | `a62b0e24…19210`, same logical bindings, consumed |\n| Candidate binding | `d1109d8f…39112`, product binding `1b016220…5611c` |\n\nThe archived generation chain is ordered:\n\n`approved` generation 4 → `delivery_pending` 5 → `delivered` 6/message `157` → `sent_audited` 7/message `157`.\n\nThere is exactly one delivery ledger row and one accepted `draft_sent` event.\n\n## Historical integrity and retention\n\nAuthoritative archive:\n\n- ID: `2009ac177177839cefddb98f285e27fa`\n- Digest: `644d74b05bc8115f9e3aeeba035188da195a7de18f1bc737648931d64bf43bcf`\n- 23 retained scopes\n- Manifest: `ca4811444e114a06749620b9a44e05c8bd62bc3223ec80b1b5740c832c4a84c1`\n- Receipt: `e81a84a8584400401f83aace36283dee18660144ede11e854758e725796e7fb3`\n\nTask index hashes, all matching current bytes:\n\n- Task22: `cc4ac1264d947226f0e2ebfdd2f3845781d48ab298a71ae96c09517eecb26309`\n- Task23: `86b72c4c21b9f1113cb34e81b293e93ed7df7ac1388d3d1b31d9dc01dca3987a`\n- Task24: `4df0f8712887f2125e100ba8d7585914b7b8810a298c37f9a32584b31fabe04d`\n- Task25: `c3c40ff9406dbb2609ee7ef89be2fdc20fa139064b5d65e494c6efc8b2a80ed2`\n- Combined index digest: `419511b6fadb7920e155dcd5b57d20661d750a989ef0912e9ddf1bfbc0cb0abe`\n\nCore paths:\n\n- `.omo/evidence/dualcoach-task-24-live-terminal-evidence.json` — `7431b043…2258b4`\n- `.omo/evidence/dualcoach-task-25-live-terminal-evidence.json` — `30275bb8…d6378d`\n- `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-repaired-archive-successor-2e0894ea…/bindings/historical-archive-binding.json`\n- `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-repaired-archive-successor-2e0894ea…/bindings/task22-25-reconciliation-index.json`\n- `/home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/data/rehearsal-reset-archives/2009ac177177839cefddb98f285e27fa`\n\n## v38 qualification boundary\n\nv38 correctly labels Task22-25 as:\n\n`historical_only_not_execution_on_successor`\n\nand states:\n\n`historical_execution_retargeted_to_successor: false`.\n\nCandidate/seal evidence:\n\n- Candidate: `d1109d8f78aaccf949ec4f664d9e62584c3cca33032030518bc3e2d712239112`\n- Prefreeze seal: `257498e6…b037b9`\n- Postfreeze seal: `3002d815…5878f6`\n- Delivered bundle: `54be54cf…752f67`\n- Delivered inventory: 482 entries; all 396 file hashes independently matched\n- Postfreeze PASS: `83b8ca5c…bafa2`\n- Qualification proof: `8187d6a9…90f68`\n\nSource and installed Golden Paths independently bind candidate, owner/customer routes, card, generation, capability, message, and `sent_audited` receipt. Their Telegram API exercise was loopback-only with `external_traffic:false`, not new real-surface execution.\n\n## Task26/27 external-action adjudication\n\n**Task26:** zero Telegram actions and zero live-customer actions, confirmed by:\n\n- `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-v38-final-six-lane-review.json`\n- `.omo/start-work/ledger.jsonl:170`\n- Local-socket receipts show no external traffic.\n\n**Task27:** an explicitly authorized internal profile cleanup occurred, but no Telegram/provider action, activation, delivery, service start, release, push, or commit occurred.\n\n- Authorization: `c3b43617…ad5e`\n- Cleanup receipt: `7848def4…2a3a`\n- Operation: `e90fcc341e9f49c2a2c57ce46dd50c12`\n- Customer disabled/nonconsenting; service inactive/dead; active/pending/unknown/orphan counts zero.\n- Canonical cleanup manifest: `816a59cc…2704`\n- Bootstrap cleanup manifest: `e4f5b5c9…049f`\n- `.omo/evidence/task27/task27-live-cleanup-receipt.json`\n\n## Gaps\n\nNon-blocking integrity/documentation gaps:\n\n- Task22 records screenshots as unavailable.\n- One Task22 index child path, `.omo/senpi-task/children/st_019ff472/evidence/authorized-replay-evidence.json`, is absent from the current workspace. The core route/delivery chain remains independently retained in the verified archive.\n- `task27/receipt-hashes.sha256` predates the authorized cleanup: it omits the authorization/final cleanup receipts and contains the earlier controller hash. The final cleanup receipt directly binds the current controller hash `8aee38ea…443`.\n- Historical retention is hash-sealed and host-permission protected, not external WORM; this matches the plan’s disclosed trusted-host residual risk.\n\n## Blockers\n\n**None for F4.** The gaps above do not break the customer/owner route, explicit-send ordering, exactly-one delivery, retention, candidate-bound qualification, or no-new-external-action clauses."}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"persisted_only"}}
{"type":"suspended","payload":{"reason":"quit"}}
{"type":"reconcile_reattached","payload":{"session_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/children/st_01a01a0f/sessions/st_01a01a0f/2026-08-19T12-43-57-941Z_01a01a0c-be75-7bb6-b187-ec9c737d2616.jsonl"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted"}}
{"type":"evicted","payload":{"cause":"evict"}}