{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"running","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as a read-only root-cause investigation of the F2 outbox residue - I’ll trace runtime ownership and cleanup coverage against the exact live profile, then return a decisive verdict and an atomic fail-closed transaction/test design without changing state."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The live ledger is not unrelated: every one of its 26 records is bound to the target session and route. I’m now narrowing the missed ownership edge by reading the installed cleanup/inventory and outbox implementations, plus enumerating the outbox’s lock/ledger siblings and archive manifests."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The defect boundary is now clear: cleanup supports only customer-directory files, key-in-path candidates, three explicitly parsed activation/schedule files, and one draft-generations projection. The outbox is session-keyed rather than customer-keyed, so both discovery paths report zero even though bootstrap evidence binds that session to this customer. I’m doing the final integrity/read-only validation and shaping the failing-first regression and rollback contract."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as a read-only root-cause report for F2 - I traced the live residue through the installed runtime and cleanup implementation, validated it cryptographically, and designed the smallest safe remediation and regression test.\n\n## Verdict\n\nAssuming:\n\n- **H1:** the outbox represents active target workflow authority.\n- **H2:** it is historical or unrelated residue.\n\n**Decisive result:** it is **terminal historical evidence belonging exclusively to the cleaned target**, not an active/pending workflow and not unrelated.\n\n- H1 is false operationally: all records are `COMMITTED`; none are dispatchable or awaiting reconciliation.\n- H2 is only partly true: historical yes, unrelated no.\n- F2 is a real cleanup coverage defect. The target’s committed publication evidence survived because it is keyed by `session_id` and route, while cleanup discovers shared data by `customer_key`.\n\n## Exact live observations\n\nProfile:\n\n`/home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest`\n\nTarget binding from the archived bootstrap ledger:\n\n- customer: `task26_claim_20260818145508_1b96b23d`\n- session: `cb_mYUoMIsk_CRzSDKYpPE9dg`\n- user/chat/topic: `8527916639 / 8527916639 / 0`\n- state at cleanup: `AWAITING_ACTIVATION`\n- expiry: `2026-08-18T15:25:08.385071+00:00`\n\nLive outbox `ledger.json`:\n\n- schema: `telegram-nutrition-onboarding-publication-outbox-v2`\n- size: 17,668 bytes\n- SHA-256: `0d79c3e461a0401265d3033b364eb8ec4323b5614386693231d003c7b312a947`\n- records: 26\n- sessions: exactly `{cb_mYUoMIsk_CRzSDKYpPE9dg: 26}`\n- routes: exactly `{(\"8527916639\", \"0\"): 26}`\n- roles: exactly `{customer: 26}`\n- states: exactly `{COMMITTED: 26}`\n- payload states: 22 `collecting`, 4 `customer_attestation`\n- generations: `0..21, 23, 24, 25, 26`\n- message IDs: `304, 306, ..., 346, 348, 350, 352, 354`\n- literal customer key is absent from the ledger.\n\nUsing the installed `GatewayOnboardingPublicationOutbox(..., initialize=False)` validated all 26 records and their HMAC receipt integrity:\n\n- primary records: 26\n- emergency records: 0\n- target owner callback: absent\n\nThe runtime service is currently inactive/dead with `MainPID=0`; no real profile process was found. The customer data directory and bootstrap source directory are absent. Registry state is disabled with `ai_processing_consent.granted=false`.\n\n## Why this is terminal, not active\n\nInstalled runtime:\n\n`gateway/platforms/telegram_nutrition_onboarding_publication_outbox.py`\n\n- Lines 69-82 define the outbox as the durable publication receipt authority and all seven paths.\n- Lines 217-239 transition a receipted publication to `COMMITTED` only after profile commit.\n- Lines 241-247 expose only `RECEIPTED` records for recovery.\n- Lines 642-655 initialize the complete outbox suite.\n- Lines 657-684 inspect and integrity-check the suite.\n- Lines 897-931 parse and reject malformed or ambiguous ledgers.\n\nTherefore these records cannot initiate another send. They are nevertheless customer-related durable publication evidence and violate a zero-residue cleanup assertion.\n\n## Why cleanup missed it\n\nInstalled cleanup code:\n\n### `archive_customer_cleanup`\n\n`checkin_cli/customer_cleanup.py`\n\n- Lines 127-148 call `source_inventory()` using only the customer directory and explicit `candidate_paths`.\n- The live manifest confirms:\n  - `candidate: []`\n  - `shared_ledger_projections: []`\n  - inventory contains only three customer-directory files.\n- Lines 204-218 trust `post_cleanup_authority_inventory()` before and after pruning.\n\n### Source inventory\n\n`checkin_cli/customer_cleanup_fs.py`, lines 62-101:\n\n- Automatically walks only `data/customers/<customer_key>`.\n- An external candidate is accepted only when its path is customer-scoped or its filename contains the customer key.\n- `data/onboarding/telegram-publication-outbox-v1/ledger.json` satisfies neither rule.\n\n### Post-cleanup inventory\n\n`checkin_cli/customer_cleanup_inventory.py`, lines 162-261:\n\n- Shared authorities are limited to `draft-generations.json`.\n- The generic scan at lines 218-235 only recognizes files whose **relative pathname contains the customer key**.\n- It does not inspect session-keyed outbox records.\n- Consequently it returned `active_count=0`, `orphan_count=0`, and Task27 recorded a false PASS.\n\n### Shared-ledger support gap\n\n`checkin_cli/customer_cleanup_shared.py`, lines 16-20:\n\n- The closed `SharedLedgerProjection` enum supports only:\n  `data/owner-actions/draft-generations.json`.\n- There is no publication-outbox projection or customer-to-session resolver.\n\n## Files that must move together\n\nThe current directory contains exactly seven entries:\n\n1. `.lock`\n2. `.emergency.lock`\n3. `.owner-callbacks.lock`\n4. `.receipt-key`\n5. `ledger.json`\n6. `emergency.json`\n7. `owner-callbacks.json`\n\nThey form one integrity/concurrency domain and must be archived as a directory, not as an isolated ledger:\n\n- `.receipt-key` authenticates publication and callback receipts.\n- The primary and emergency ledgers reconcile against each other.\n- Owner callbacks bind to committed primary publications.\n- The three lock files protect those stores and their inode identity.\n- Runtime initialization and inspection expect the suite coherently.\n\nIf `ledger-v1-untrusted.json` exists in another profile, it must move with the suite too. Unexpected temporary or unknown entries should block cleanup rather than be silently included.\n\nThe staff-membership journal containing route `8527916639` is not an outbox sibling and cannot safely be deleted based on route alone; it is a profile-wide subscription journal.\n\n## Smallest safe archive/prune transaction\n\nBecause every live outbox record belongs to this one target and both adjunct ledgers are empty, the smallest live remediation is an **atomic directory rename into a new archive operation**, not record-by-record rewriting.\n\n### Fail-closed preconditions\n\nUnder the profile authority lock and all three outbox locks:\n\n1. Service is fenced/inactive and no matching profile process exists.\n2. Registry row exactly matches the expected customer, route, disabled state, and non-consent state.\n3. Canonical cleanup journal is committed and its archive verifies.\n4. Archived bootstrap evidence uniquely binds target customer → target session → route.\n5. Customer and bootstrap source directories remain absent.\n6. Runtime inspection validates all HMAC-backed outbox records.\n7. Every primary record:\n   - has the expected session and route,\n   - has role `customer`,\n   - is `COMMITTED`.\n8. Emergency and callback ledgers are empty.\n9. Entry set is exactly the expected seven files; no symlinks, hard links, foreign owners, permissive modes, temporary files, or foreign records.\n10. Re-stat every entry after reading and require unchanged device/inode/size/mtime/hash.\n11. New archive destination is absent and on device `66306`, matching the source.\n12. No existing committed Task27 archive is modified.\n\n### Transaction\n\n1. Write and fsync a new `PREPARED` manifest containing every entry’s identity, size, mode, and SHA-256 plus the exact customer/session/route binding.\n2. Atomically rename the entire directory to:\n   `data/task27-final-cleanup/archives/<new-op>/payload/data/onboarding/telegram-publication-outbox-v1`\n3. Fsync source and archive parents.\n4. Revalidate the archived suite with `initialize=False`, verify all manifest hashes, and confirm the live source path is absent.\n5. Append/fsync `ARCHIVED_VERIFIED`, then `COMMITTED`; freeze the archive read-only.\n\nA later runtime start may create a fresh empty suite and a new receipt key through `_prepare_paths`; it cannot recover these archived records.\n\n### Rollback\n\nBefore commit, any verification or journal failure must rename the unchanged archived directory back to the original path and fsync both parents. Rollback is permitted only if:\n\n- the original path is still absent,\n- archive identities still match the prepared manifest,\n- service remains fenced,\n- no fresh outbox was created.\n\nOtherwise stop fail-closed and require operator recovery. After `COMMITTED`, rollback must be a separate authenticated operation.\n\n## Failing-first test design\n\n1. **Inventory regression**\n   - Create a disabled/nonconsenting customer.\n   - Create bootstrap/session binding and one valid committed publication record.\n   - Assert `post_cleanup_authority_inventory()` reports `outbox > 0` and, after a committed cleanup journal, `orphan_count > 0`.\n   - Current code fails by returning zero.\n\n2. **Cleanup integration**\n   - Run `archive_customer_cleanup()` against a customer whose only remaining authority is the session-keyed outbox.\n   - Assert cleanup cannot commit while that authority is unarchived.\n   - After outbox projection/archive support, assert the complete seven-file suite is archived and the live target authority is absent.\n   - Current code commits while leaving the ledger live.\n\n3. **Foreign-record fail-closed test**\n   - Add one committed record for a second session/customer.\n   - Assert whole-directory archival is rejected and no bytes move.\n   - This prevents cross-customer deletion.\n\n4. **Nonterminal and malformed cases**\n   - Parameterize `DISPATCHING`, `RECEIPTED`, non-empty emergency ledger, callback records, unknown entries, changed inode/hash, and missing receipt key.\n   - Each must block without mutation.\n\n5. **Deterministic rollback**\n   - Inject a fault immediately after atomic rename.\n   - Assert exact source tree identity is restored, archive payload is absent, and no commit phase exists.\n   - Use fault hooks/events, not sleeps or polling.\n\nNo profile, service, repository file, or external state was modified."}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"persisted_only"}}
{"type":"suspended","payload":{"reason":"quit"}}
{"type":"reconcile_reattached","payload":{"session_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/children/st_01a01a15/sessions/st_01a01a15/2026-08-19T12-53-38-023Z_01a01a15-9867-7c50-af15-a35b2c4769e3.jsonl"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted"}}
{"type":"evicted","payload":{"cause":"evict"}}