{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"running","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as a read-only invariant audit of the restart timeout - I’ll inspect the recorded evidence and lifecycle implementation, then rank five falsifiable assumptions with exact source locations and a decisive focused query."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I found a stronger runtime discriminator than the timeout alone: the replacement did launch and reached the same fake API (calls 67-70), but stalled before `deleteWebhook/getUpdates`. I’m tracing that startup interval now, especially the persisted-state recovery invoked between membership validation and polling."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as a read-only invariant audit of the restart timeout - I inspected the lifecycle evidence and traced replacement startup through recovery and polling.\n\n## Key finding\n\nThe replacement child **did launch and contact the same fake API**. Calls 67-70 are its startup:\n\n- `getMe`\n- `getMe`\n- `getChatMember`\n- `sendChatAction`\n\nIt then stopped before command registration, `deleteWebhook`, or `getUpdates` (`.omo/evidence/v1.1.1-stability/disposable-e2e/fake-api-calls.jsonl:67-70`).\n\nMore importantly, `child_adapter_stopped` exists without `child_adapter_ready` (`process-events.jsonl:5`; ready is emitted only at `scripts/dualcoach_v111_disposable_process.py:174-184`). This strongly indicates `adapter.connect()` returned false or raised, and the child exited while the harness continued waiting solely for `getUpdates`.\n\n## Five load-bearing assumptions\n\n### 1. The replacement is the intended child with the same profile/config/runtime identity\n\n**Evidence**\n\n- Every launch receives the same `profile` object and explicit child environment: `scripts/run_dualcoach_v111_disposable_e2e.py:124-173`.\n- The child loads preflight from the explicit `--profile` path and overlays the supplied API URL: `scripts/dualcoach_v111_disposable_process.py:143-163`.\n- Calls 67-70 prove the replacement reached the existing loopback Bot API.\n- The prepared profile is created once at `scripts/run_dualcoach_v111_disposable_e2e.py:653-678`.\n\n**Smallest falsification query**\n\nRun only child startup against the retained pre-update-4 fixture and print:\n\n- PID/argv\n- `preflight.redacted_identity`\n- `HERMES_HOME`\n- `DUALCOACH_PROFILE_PACKAGE`\n- effective `config.extra[\"base_url\"]`\n\nCompare these with the preceding child.\n\n**Observable**\n\n- **True:** identical profile path, config SHA-256, credential identity, package path, and API port; calls continue at sequence 67.\n- **False:** differing hash/path/port, or no calls on the existing fake API.\n\n---\n\n### 2. “Waiting for polling” also detects child startup failure\n\nThis assumption is already contradicted by the evidence.\n\n**Evidence**\n\n- `_start_and_wait_for_poll` waits only on an API action future: `scripts/run_dualcoach_v111_disposable_e2e.py:224-246`.\n- It never races that future against `child.wait()` or `child.poll()`.\n- Child stdout and stderr are discarded: `scripts/run_dualcoach_v111_disposable_e2e.py:172-173`.\n- `child_adapter_ready` is written only after successful `adapter.connect()`: `scripts/dualcoach_v111_disposable_process.py:174-181`.\n- Current evidence has `child_adapter_stopped` but no replacement-ready event: `process-events.jsonl:5`.\n\n**Smallest falsification query**\n\nA focused harness test where `_start_child` returns a process that exits nonzero before `getUpdates`. Await `_start_and_wait_for_poll`.\n\n**Observable**\n\n- **True:** it immediately reports the child return code/startup error.\n- **False/current behavior:** it waits 20 seconds and reports `timed out waiting for ... polling`.\n\n---\n\n### 3. The fake Telegram server preserves pending update 4 and action state across children\n\n**Evidence**\n\n- One `FakeTelegramApi` is created and started for the whole lifecycle: `scripts/run_dualcoach_v111_disposable_e2e.py:653,678`.\n- Engine updates and actions are instance-owned lists: `scripts/dualcoach_v111_fake_telegram_engine.py:51-53`.\n- `getUpdates` removes only IDs lower than the requested offset: `dualcoach_v111_fake_telegram_engine.py:328-339`.\n- Observed offsets progress across earlier children as `[0,2,0,3,0,4]`: `.omo/evidence/v1.1.1-stability/disposable-e2e/offsets.json:1`.\n- Calls 67-70 continue the prior action sequence rather than restarting at 1.\n\n**Smallest falsification query**\n\nSnapshot `next_update_id`, pending update IDs, server identity/port, and action count immediately before and after replacement launch.\n\n**Observable**\n\n- **True:** same engine/port, update 4 remains queued, action count advances from 66 to 70.\n- **False:** a new engine/port, empty queue, reset sequence, or update 4 missing.\n\n---\n\n### 4. The update-4 child was fully reaped and released all process-scoped locks\n\n**Evidence**\n\n- The harness waits for the exact fault exit before setting `child = None`: `scripts/run_dualcoach_v111_disposable_e2e.py:797-804`.\n- The fault uses `os._exit(73)`: `scripts/dualcoach_v111_disposable_process.py:54-61,101-118`.\n- Final cleanup reports every child reaped: `.omo/evidence/v1.1.1-stability/disposable-e2e/cleanup.json:1`.\n- Task26 update processing holds a shared `flock` through the update: `gateway/platforms/task26_runtime_authority.py:138-159`; process exit should release it.\n\n**Smallest falsification query**\n\nImmediately after `_await_exit`, assert:\n\n1. `child.poll() == 73`\n2. `/proc/<pid>` is absent\n3. a fresh process can acquire the authority lock non-blockingly.\n\n**Observable**\n\n- **True:** PID absent and lock acquisition succeeds.\n- **False:** surviving PID or `LOCK_NB` returns `EWOULDBLOCK`.\n\n---\n\n### 5. Recovery of the response-before-receipt state completes before polling starts\n\nThis is the leading violated production invariant.\n\n**Evidence**\n\n- Startup explicitly runs all nutrition recovery **before** `deleteWebhook` and `start_polling`: `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:3054-3057,3108-3128`.\n- Calls 67-70 correspond to initialization and staff-readiness validation. No later command or polling call appears.\n- Update 4 faults immediately before `GatewayOnboardingPublicationOutbox.record_receipt`: `scripts/dualcoach_v111_disposable_process.py:101-118`.\n- Recovery only commits `RECEIPTED` outbox rows: `telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime_publication_transport.py:45-58`.\n- Replay of an existing `DISPATCHING` publication reconstructs authority via `outbox.get`; an authority mismatch can raise before the branch marks it uncertain: `telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime_publication_transport.py:322-352`.\n- `recover_waiting_session` invokes publication recovery and then republishes: `telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime.py:182-218`.\n- Existing focused coverage tests an idempotent edit and receipt-gate advancement separately, but not this durable `DISPATCHING` startup path: `tests/gateway/test_telegram_publication_recovery.py:105,217`.\n\n**Smallest falsification query**\n\nCreate the exact durable state produced after update 4:\n\n- domain publication `PREPARED`\n- outbox row `DISPATCHING`\n- workflow cursor 2\n- no Telegram receipt\n\nThen instantiate a fresh runtime and call `recover_waiting_session` under a bounded timeout, recording the exception and resulting outbox/domain states.\n\n**Observable**\n\n- **True:** recovery returns, publication becomes safely `UNCERTAIN` or reconciled, and startup reaches `deleteWebhook/getUpdates`.\n- **False/likely:** `outbox.get` raises an authority mismatch or another recovery exception; `adapter.connect()` returns false, producing `child_adapter_stopped` without ready/polling.\n\n## Most decisive query\n\nRace the replacement child’s exit against its first `getUpdates`, while preserving bounded stderr:\n\n```text\nFIRST_COMPLETED(child.wait(), normal_restart_getUpdates_future)\n```\n\nRun only through the update-4 restart boundary, not the full E2E.\n\nPredicted result: **child exit wins**, with the traceback rooted in response-before-receipt startup recovery. That directly distinguishes production recovery failure from fake-server, reaping, configuration, or polling-signal problems.\n\n## Minimum likely fix seam\n\n`gateway/platforms/telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime_publication_transport.py:322-352` — the prepared-publication replay path. It should handle an existing `DISPATCHING` authority deterministically without allowing reconstructed render-authority mismatch to abort adapter startup.\n\nSeparately, the harness should eventually race child exit against polling, but that is observability; it does not fix the likely recovery defect.\n\nNo files were edited and no full E2E was run."}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"persisted_only"}}
{"type":"suspended","payload":{"reason":"quit"}}
{"type":"reconcile_reattached","payload":{"session_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/children/st_01a02850/sessions/st_01a02850/2026-08-22T07-10-06-679Z_01a0284e-2b57-7f84-8b9e-7ff0afafb031.jsonl"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted"}}
{"type":"evicted","payload":{"cause":"evict"}}