message: 403: {"code":"ENTITLEMENT_ERROR","message":"Error 403: the user is not subscribed to required model plan"}

stop_reason: error


error_message: 403: {"code":"ENTITLEMENT_ERROR","message":"Error 403: the user is not subscribed to required model plan"}


I read this as finding whether an existing config/route can skip the bad per-chat command registration without changing the sealed candidate or preserved state - I checked the Telegram startup, config, and menu surfaces for any supported bypass.

<results>
<files>
- /home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v111-impl/gateway/platforms/telegram.py - startup path; command registration is unconditional once production_preflight exists, and customer chat IDs are taken from all registry rows
- /home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v111-impl/gateway/platforms/telegram_nutrition_menu.py - menu helper only validates routes and always calls set_my_commands for a chat scope
- /home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v111-impl/gateway/config.py - Telegram env/config switches found here are routing allowlists, not menu-registration skips
- /home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v111-impl/tests/gateway/test_telegram_production_preflight.py - tests pin exact chat-scope menu registration behavior, with no skip path
</files>

<answer>
Verdict: No.

Evidence:
- /gateway/platforms/telegram.py:2412-2425 builds `_nutrition_command_customer_chat_ids` from every customer row with a numeric `chat_id`; there is no `enabled`/disabled filter.
- /gateway/platforms/telegram.py:2801-2824 validates the route lists and then unconditionally registers chat-scoped commands for every customer and staff chat.
- /gateway/platforms/telegram.py:2799-2807 only gates this block on `production_preflight` being a mapping; it is not a selective skip switch.
- /gateway/platforms/telegram.py:5797-5800 shows the only coarse off-switch is `nutrition_coaching.enabled`.
- /gateway/config.py:880-885 and 1357-1401 expose general Telegram routing controls (`allowed_chats`, `group_allowed_chats`, `allow_from`, `group_allow_from`), but they only affect message routing, not `set_my_commands`.
- /gateway/platforms/telegram_nutrition_menu.py:74-106 has no skip control; it only dedupes/validates and then calls `set_my_commands`.
- /tests/gateway/test_telegram_production_preflight.py:216-248 asserts exact per-chat command registration behavior.

So there is no supported fine-grained switch/route to skip just the unreachable disabled customer menu registration while preserving the candidate and registry semantics. The only existing bypass is disabling the whole nutrition-coaching feature, which is broader than your constraint.
</answer>

<next_steps>
Ready to proceed - no follow-up needed.
</next_steps>
</results>