{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"running","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as a focused security audit - I’ll trace the successor delta, authorization and consent paths, then validate the candidate binding and wheel evidence without modifying anything."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The candidate is an uncommitted worktree delta rather than a reachable Git commit, so I’m treating the binding hash as an evidence identity and checking the live diff, scope publication, runtime gates, and artifact seals directly."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The runtime authority trace is clean: command-menu publication is presentation-only, while customer routing uses exact registry address keys plus live consent checks and staff paths use exact configured identities. The release evidence, however, contains a material artifact-binding inconsistency that I’m validating against the predecessor wheel and manifest before issuing the verdict."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as a focused security audit - I traced menu publication, runtime authority gates, and candidate/wheel provenance without edits.\n\n## Verdict: FAIL\n\n**Severity: HIGH, release-blocking evidence-integrity failure.**\n\nThe Telegram authority delta itself **PASSes** security review. The candidate and wheel evidence do not reliably bind that delta to one tested artifact set.\n\n### Authority findings: PASS\n\n- `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:2801-2822` ignores customer chat IDs and publishes:\n  - customer `start/help` globally, including `BotCommandScopeAllPrivateChats`;\n  - staff `help/status/approve/deny` only through per-staff `BotCommandScopeChat`.\n- Comparison with predecessor wheel shows the exact behavioral delta is deletion of only the six-line per-customer registration loop. The staff loop is byte-equivalent and unchanged.\n- Telegram menus are presentation-only. `set_my_commands` output is never consulted by routing or authorization.\n- Customer routing uses exact live registry addresses:\n  - `nutrition_coaching.py:3209` resolves `_routes[address.key]`;\n  - `telegram.py:14440-14503` routes customer and trainer traffic through `resolve`, `resolve_trainer`, and `trainer_private_active`.\n- Consent remains independently enforced:\n  - `nutrition_coaching.py:6993-7006` requires granted consent, recording date, and current consent version;\n  - `coaching_processing_allowed` and `customer_transport_allowed` revalidate live registry, enabled state, consent, safety holds, plan window, and exact destination.\n- Staff authority is unchanged and menu-independent:\n  - `telegram.py:5925-5947` authenticates the exact configured operator tuple;\n  - `telegram.py:7469+` rejects draft callbacks unless `_nutrition_operator_actor` succeeds;\n  - trainer group and private-DM paths require exact registered assignments and active bindings.\n\nThe broad Default/AllGroup customer menu publication remains, but this only exposes UI hints and grants no authority.\n\n### Evidence-integrity failure\n\nCandidate binding cryptography is internally consistent:\n\n- Derivation inputs hash to  \n  `e55ac326eab1fa81a56c8798efc14d3bcc7956d08761af095168e7ec8573b9ae`.\n- Canonical binding hashes to the claimed  \n  `3bb8d4d70ac4319c0dfe2633f92713f15eb14ed202bb0e33ad5f294d72acac1a`.\n- Hermes wheel A/B both match the bound hash  \n  `738d5d8cc0abdddb28e305c6cccbd9fa2098052d359535b106e3aed4a237b820`.\n\nHowever:\n\n1. The binding and manifest claim profile wheel hash:\n\n   `27f7427199d4a0a2e8a08aba26431552655f615544be0f13741e88b4b7f2250a`\n\n2. Both successor build directories actually contain:\n\n   `eb2a67a4b709c47b9982a5ae87187596350eda7cf2b7d064a82af51112a40072`\n\n3. The claimed `27f742...` artifact is instead the predecessor stability wheel.\n\n4. The unbound successor profile wheel differs in five members:\n   - `checkin_cli/customer_coaching.py`\n   - `checkin_cli/models.py`\n   - `checkin_cli/wizard.py`\n   - `checkin_cli/wizard_models.py`\n   - `RECORD`\n\n5. Install A/B explicitly point to the predecessor stability profile wheel, not the profile wheels under the successor evidence directory.\n\n6. The cited disposable E2E evidence is not bound to candidate `e55ac326...`; it records synthetic candidate `1477699a...` with unrelated Hermes/profile wheel hashes.\n\nThe wheels' internal RECORD hashes are valid and A/B are reproducible. This indicates **unbound artifact substitution/evidence pollution**, not a malformed ZIP, but intent cannot be established from the evidence.\n\n### Blockers\n\n- Remove or explain the unbound successor profile wheels, then regenerate the manifest against the exact shipped artifacts.\n- Run disposable E2E against candidate `e55ac326...` and its declared wheel hashes.\n- Regenerate installed provenance from that same artifact set.\n- Bind or exclude the four changed profile modules so no source/build changes sit outside the successor delta.\n\nVerification performed: focused command-scope tests passed (`3 passed`); selected consent/operator routing tests passed (`2 passed`). No files were edited."}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"revived","payload":{"run_epoch":1}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as a final release-gate re-review - I’ll verify the corrected menu authority behavior and independently recompute every candidate, wheel, provenance, E2E, and manifest binding without edits."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as a final release-gate re-review - I verified code authority and corrected evidence bindings.\n\n**PASS**\n\n**Blockers:** None."}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"persisted_only"}}
{"type":"suspended","payload":{"reason":"quit"}}
{"type":"reconcile_reattached","payload":{"session_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/children/st_01a02944/sessions/st_01a02944/2026-08-22T11-35-37-777Z_01a02941-4231-78ac-bc6c-54b656bcf8e8.jsonl"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted"}}
{"type":"evicted","payload":{"cause":"evict"}}