I read this as a code-quality and correctness review - I will inspect the specified implementation and tests, then return an evidence-backed PASS/FAIL without edits.


I read this as a correctness review - I inspected the current owner-risk flow and its focused tests without edits.

**FAIL**

- **P1** `dualcoach/profile/checkin_cli/nutrition_onboarding_owner_risk.py:131-140`, `nutrition_onboarding_finalize_service.py:54-55`
  Acceptance receipts exist only in the transient workflow, then finalization deletes that workflow. No ready artifact retains or references them. Reproduced: a successful risk-acceptance flow reached `ready` with no receipt/digest and no workflow file.

- **P1** `dualcoach/profile/checkin_cli/nutrition_onboarding_owner_risk.py:134-138`, `nutrition_onboarding.py:339-343`, `nutrition_onboarding_finalization.py:129-134`, `nutrition_onboarding.py:431-432`
  Medical safety holds can take the owner-risk action and be approved into `finalizing`, but finalization still requires clinical clearance. The failure leaves the session in `finalizing`, where clinical review is rejected because it only accepts `safety_hold`. Reproduced: finalization raised the clinical-review error; status remained `finalizing`.

- **P1** `gateway/platforms/telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime_publication.py:66-72,102-123,339`
  A valid `owner_risk_acceptance` capability is unusable unless `operator_notification_recovery` is also configured. The publication helper returns before constructing the risk binding when recovery is absent, so no button is emitted. The loader independently accepts the owner-risk-only configuration. Reproduced: authorized owner-risk capability produced an empty action list.

**Missed tests**
- Risk acceptance followed by successful finalization preserves a validated receipt in durable ready artifacts.
- Medical safety hold -> risk acceptance -> approval does not wedge in `finalizing`.
- Owner-risk-only capability either publishes the action or startup rejects the unsupported configuration explicitly.

Focused tests passed: `test_owner_v1_contract.py` (4), `test_telegram_operator_notification_recovery.py` (13); related onboarding/recovery suites also passed.


I read this as a post-fix correctness review - I will inspect the updated persistence, finalization/readiness, capability publication, and coverage, then return an evidence-backed PASS/FAIL without edits.


I read this as a read-only re-review of the three P1 fixes - I’m completing code-path and regression verification, then will return an evidence-backed PASS/FAIL.


I found one remaining recovery path to verify: owner-risk approval still bypasses the finalization clinical gate for pregnancy, while readiness still requires clinical clearance. I’m reproducing that state transition and rerunning the focused suites in their correct package contexts.


I read this as a read-only re-review of the three P1 fixes - the focused suites pass, but the pregnancy path reproduced the same unrecoverable `finalizing` wedge, so I’m collecting final line evidence and checking packaged/source parity before the verdict.


I read this as a read-only re-review of the three P1 fixes - FAIL due to one remaining finalization wedge.

- **P1** `nutrition_onboarding_finalization.py:154-160` lets owner-risk evidence bypass pregnancy clearance, but `nutrition_readiness_validators.py:143-144` still rejects pregnancy without clinical review. Approval moves the session to `finalizing` (`nutrition_onboarding.py:338-341`), where clinical review is unavailable (`:431-432`). Reproduced: finalization failed with `pregnancy_breastfeeding_requires_clinical_review`, state remained `finalizing`, and clinical recovery failed.

Verified fixes:
- Receipt history is validated and embedded before session deletion: `nutrition_onboarding_finalization.py:142-152,201-208`; readiness validates the embedded receipt: `nutrition_readiness_validators.py:145-171`.
- Owner-risk publication no longer requires recovery capability: `telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime_publication.py:71-149`; regression asserts owner-risk-only action at `test_telegram_operator_notification_recovery.py:284-294`.

Missed regression: pregnancy/breastfeeding safety hold -> owner-risk -> owner approval -> finalization must either succeed under explicit policy or remain clinically recoverable.

Verification passed:
- `24 passed` - profile owner/onboarding suites
- `13 passed` - Telegram operator-recovery suite
- `git diff --check` clean
- Source/build copies match for the affected profile modules.


I read this as a final read-only blocker review of the pregnancy alignment and candidate update - I’ll inspect the changed policy/test paths and run the focused regressions before returning only the verdict.


I read this as a final blocker review - the implementation now aligns the two policy gates, but the cited regression does not set `pregnancy_breastfeeding=True` in the checked-in test, so I’m verifying the true pregnancy-plus-conditions path and coverage before the verdict.


I read this as a final blocker review - FAIL.

- **P2** `dualcoach/profile/tests/test_nutrition_onboarding.py:638-642`: the owner-risk finalization test leaves `pregnancy_breastfeeding` at its default `False`. The only `True` case is the clinical-clearance test at `:519-543`, not owner-risk finalization. The claimed regression is therefore absent.

The read-only pregnancy-plus-conditions flow with candidate `9dcf...a189` did reach `ready` with a ready audit; focused suites also passed (24 + 13).


I read this as a final read-only verification of the corrected regression coverage - I’ll inspect the exact test body and run only that checked-in test before returning the verdict.


I read this as final regression verification - PASS.

`test_owner_finalization_writes_ready_artifacts_and_disabled_projection` now sets pregnancy true with conditions (`test_nutrition_onboarding.py:640-644`) and reaches ready with a passing readiness audit (`:728-735`). Exact test passed.