I read this as a practical plan review - I’ll verify the plan’s references, task executability, and QA scenarios for blocking issues.


I read this as a practical plan review - I found blocking reference and final-QA gaps.

[REJECT]

**Summary**: Core implementation tasks are actionable, but one cited contract file is absent, the candidate verifier is incompatible with v1.4, and final verifiers lack executable QA invocations.

**Blocking Issues**:
1. Todo 3 references `dualcoach/profile/contracts/checkin-event.schema.json:22-47`, but that file does not exist. Replace it with the actual canonical contract source or explicitly add the schema to scope.
2. Todo 12 cites `scripts/verify_dualcoach_v11_candidate.py`, which only permits a v1.0-to-v1.1 TTL-only wheel delta. It cannot qualify v1.4 changes; specify or add a v1.4-compatible candidate verifier and invocation.
3. Final verifiers F1-F5 provide audit descriptions and evidence paths only, with no concrete tool/invocation and expected result. Add executable QA scenarios for each final verifier.