I read this as an implementation task limited to Todo 6 - I’ll inspect the plan, existing gateway/Telegram contracts, and Python rules before adding the isolated projector with red-first tests.


I read this as an implementation request - I’m isolating Todo 6, preserving concurrent work, and will establish the required RED baseline before building the projector.


I read this as an implementation request - Todo 6 is implemented and isolated.

Implemented the Topic-59 privacy-safe day-card projector, append-only reservation ledger, terminal outcome handling, strict whitelist rendering, and fake Telegram send/edit QA. No dispatcher or live-network wiring was added.

Verified:
- 14 focused Topic-59 tests passed.
- 19 related weekly-operations tests passed.
- `basedpyright`: 0 errors/warnings.
- Evidence: `.omo/evidence/nutricoach-v140-weekly-operations/task-6-topic59.json` and retained RED receipt.


I read this as a focused repair request - I’ll reproduce the r2 privacy/slot failures first, then tighten the projector without touching dispatcher or concurrent Todo paths.


I read this as implementation verification - complete Todo 6 r2 validation, record the unrelated concurrent-suite failure, and write evidence.


I read this as implementation completion - report Todo 6 r2 verification and evidence.

Todo 6 r2 is complete within scope: opaque identifiers, strict payload validation, immutable customer/day slots, terminal pin-drift incidents, typed outcomes, and adversarial coverage are in place.

Verified:
- 19 focused Topic-59 tests passed.
- 91 related gateway/Telegram tests passed.
- Ruff, ty, basedpyright, LSP, isolated compileall, privacy scan, and LOC limits passed.
- Evidence: `.omo/evidence/nutricoach-v140-weekly-operations/task-6-topic59-r2.json`

The full related command has 16 pre-existing `TestNutritionScheduleDelivery` failures caused by its hard-coded external profile missing `checkin_cli.weekly_operations`; recorded in the evidence without modifying the excluded scheduler/Telegram runtime.