I read this as a read-only forward-port feasibility proof - I’ll snapshot both worktrees, reconstruct the port only in disposable storage, run the required verification matrix, freeze evidence outside the repositories, and report an exact patch map without touching live paths.


The initial snapshot shows the target is a heavily uncommitted sealed-source tree, so the sandbox must be a byte-preserving copy rather than a clean checkout. I’m now isolating the v1.5 feature delta from unrelated work and tracing the overlapping Telegram symbols before constructing the semantic merge.


The three-way reconstruction produced exactly three semantic conflicts: v1.4 production command registration versus startup authority verification, v1.4 trainer/private-trainer text routes versus unknown channel-customer suppression, and v1.4’s corrected thread-context helper versus channel topic identity. I resolved each by retaining both independent responsibilities and am beginning baseline-versus-ported verification.


Runtime verification is green: the real python-telegram-bot feature scenarios pass 24/24, the topic/reply/delivery set is identical at 169/169, and the v1.4 nutrition/weekly set is identical at 99/99. One static blocker has surfaced: project Ruff and `ty` pass, but basedpyright adds diagnostics on the feature surface beyond the 6,937-error v1.4 baseline; I’m quantifying those exactly while completing the manual scenario and immutability evidence.


I read this as a read-only forward-port feasibility proof - I reconstructed and tested the port in disposable storage, preserved evidence, and removed the sandbox.

# Result: FAIL qualification, but forward-port feasibility proven

The feature merges semantically onto v1.4 and all runtime tests pass without regression. It cannot receive `PASS` because the current v1.5 feature introduces static-quality failures.

## Snapshot and immutability

Both worktrees started at:

- HEAD: `ccd2eee8a97a13d25c36c1446ed5b5aca2e88653`
- v1.5 branch: `feature/nutricoach-channel-inbox-v1.5.0`, 9 status entries
- v1.4 branch: `feature/nutricoach-weekly-operations-v1.4.0`, 6,224 status entries

Before/after comparisons are byte-exact for both worktrees:

- HEAD and branch
- porcelain status
- tracked and staged binary diffs
- non-evidence source SHA-256 manifests
- modes and symlinks

No repository, service, watcher, Telegram network, or Todo14 action occurred. The disposable sandbox was removed.

The existing live gateway remained PID `571685`. Its normal cron process independently created six output files and updated `jobs.json`/`.tick.lock` during verification; therefore the whole live profile was not globally byte-static, but none of those paths were accessed for writing by this task.

## Verification

Passed:

- Compile:
  - baseline: clean
  - ported: clean
- Project Ruff on six new Python files: clean
- `ty` on new/changed feature surface: clean
- Real python-telegram-bot feature tests: **24 passed**
- Explicit customer/admin/callback/default-OFF/scheduled/migration scenarios: **6 passed**
- Topic/reply/delivery/rich/channel tests:
  - baseline: **169 passed**
  - ported: **169 passed**
- Nutrition and v1.4 weekly/topic/reminder tests:
  - baseline: **99 passed**
  - ported: **99 passed**
- Pure migration applies and rolls back to byte-identical registry input.

## Blocking findings

1. **basedpyright regression**
   - v1.4 changed-surface baseline: 6,937 errors
   - ported surface: 7,017 errors
   - Net feature delta: **+80 diagnostics**
   - Examples include unannotated Pydantic `model_config`, unused call results, unnecessary type checks, private re-exports, and feature-test typing errors.

2. **No-excuse gate fails**
   - **17 violations**
   - 16 forbidden `object` annotations
   - `test_telegram_channel_inbox.py` is 300 pure LOC, exceeding the 250 LOC ceiling.

3. **Parameter-bloat review**
   - New feature functions exceed three parameters, notably:
     - `ChannelInboxConfig.runtime_authorized`
     - `channel_inbox_capability_digest`
     - `_proposal_digest`
     - `plan_registry_migration`

These are present in the current v1.5 feature itself, not caused by conflict resolution.

## Exact manual patch map

New files, mode `0664`:

- `.omo/feature-briefs/nutricoach-channel-inbox-v1.5.0.md`
- `telegram_channel_inbox_config.py`
  - config payload parsing, capability digest, runtime authority
- `telegram_channel_inbox.py`
  - PTB message parsing, topic/customer identity boundary
- `nutricoach_channel_inbox_migration_models.py`
  - route, proposal, rejection types
- `nutricoach_channel_inbox_migration.py`
  - plan/apply/rollback and canonical byte hashing
- `test_telegram_channel_inbox.py`
- `test_channel_inbox_migration.py`

Modified symbols:

- `TelegramAdapter.__init__`
  - parse optional config; initialize authority false
- `TelegramAdapter._channel_inbox_ingress`
- `TelegramAdapter._channel_inbox_reserves_ingress`
- `TelegramAdapter._channel_inbox_thread_metadata`
- `TelegramAdapter.connect`
  - route both startup branches through inbox authority verification
- `TelegramAdapter._connect_channel_inbox_network`
- `TelegramAdapter._verify_channel_inbox_authority`
- `TelegramAdapter._nutrition_address`
- `TelegramAdapter._handle_callback_query`
- Contact, edited, channel-post, command, location, media ingress handlers
- `TelegramAdapter._handle_text_message`
  - channel guard inserted after registered-customer handling and before trainer routing
- `TelegramAdapter._build_message_event`
  - channel topic/customer source while retaining v1.4 `_telegram_thread_context`
- `TelegramCustomerTransport._prepare_customer_send`
  - accept either exact `message_thread_id` or `direct_messages_topic_id`

Semantic conflict preservation:

- Retained v1.4 production command registration.
- Retained candidate-package identity validation and configured package-root handling.
- Retained every trainer/private-trainer/menu text route.
- Retained v1.4 thread-context normalization.
- Added unknown channel-customer suppression before trainer fallback.

## Frozen evidence

`/home/cube/projects/richard/.senpi-evidence/st_01a0405c-channel-inbox-forward-port`

Key artifacts:

- `sandbox.diff`
- Diff SHA-256: `477ef807f1467025e95d31f65ff504d1d414553cbaca4a631e33cb5c11e50842`
- `patch-tree/`
- `telegram-forward-port.diff`
- `nutrition-transport-forward-port.diff`
- complete baseline/ported logs and immutability manifests

Architectural review: module responsibilities and boundary parsing are coherent, variant routing is unaffected, and behavioral coverage is strong. Qualification fails specifically on the type/no-excuse/size/parameter issues above.


I read this as a fresh qualification run against the refactored v1.5 bytes - I’ll rebuild the semantic port from the current v1.4 snapshot in a new disposable sandbox, rerun the full baseline/candidate gate matrix, freeze new evidence, verify protected paths, and remove the sandbox.


The refactor added a shared testkit and split adapter tests while keeping the same two tracked integration surfaces. I’m materializing a new byte-preserving v1.4 sandbox now and will replay the current v1.5 three-way delta, including a fresh semantic resolution of the Telegram conflicts rather than reusing prior artifacts.


The strict refactor clears the previously blocking gates: compile, project Ruff, no-excuse, and all new-file LOC limits are clean. The semantic merge still has the same three conflict sites, resolved by retaining v1.4 production command registration, all trainer/private-trainer branches, and `_telegram_thread_context` while adding the channel authority and fail-closed guards.


All behavioral evidence remains green and baseline-identical, but the refreshed target exposes a qualification discrepancy: new standalone production modules are basedpyright-clean, while the exact integration diff adds basedpyright diagnostics inside `TelegramAdapter` and `TelegramCustomerTransport`; the split tests also produce 32 direct basedpyright diagnostics despite Ruff, `ty`, and no-excuse being clean. I’m freezing that exact result rather than masking it.


A protected-path race occurred during final sealing: the v1.5 source manifest changed while the sandbox run was in progress, so the tested bytes are no longer the current worktree. I did not write either worktree; I’m identifying the concurrent delta and will not mislabel stale evidence as a current qualification.


The apparent race is limited to ignored `.ruff_cache` and `__pycache__` artifacts in v1.5; porcelain status, tracked diff, and all cache-excluded source bytes are unchanged. I’m correcting the manifest scope to source-only, completing the protected-path comparison, and removing the sandbox.


I read this as a refreshed qualification against the strict refactor - the sandbox proof is complete, frozen, and removed.

# Result: FAIL

The forward-port compiles and has no behavioral regression, but the requested basedpyright-error gate is not zero.

## Passing gates

- Compile: baseline and ported clean
- Feature/PTB tests: **24 passed**
- Explicit customer/admin/callback/default-OFF/scheduled/migration scenarios: **6 passed**
- Topic/reply/delivery tests:
  - baseline: **169 passed**
  - ported: **169 passed**
- Nutrition/weekly/topic/reminder tests:
  - baseline: **99 passed**
  - ported: **99 passed**
- Ruff on eight new files: clean
- `ty`:
  - new files: clean
  - common surface: 739 baseline, 739 ported
- No-excuse: zero violations
- New-file LOC: all below 200
- New production modules basedpyright: **0 errors**

## Blocking gate

Basedpyright on the complete changed surface:

- Existing integration baseline: **6,937 errors**
- Ported integration: **6,977 errors**
- Net feature delta: **+40**
- Diagnostics located directly on added integration lines: **41**
- Split feature tests additionally produce **32 errors**, primarily private-member access and unknown test fixture/lambda types.

Therefore the claim that the current exact diff has zero type-error gates is not reproduced on the v1.4 target.

## Merge preservation

The same three semantic conflicts were resolved while retaining:

- v1.4 production nutrition command registration
- all trainer/private-trainer/menu text branches
- v1.4 `_telegram_thread_context`
- all weekly/topic/reminder source bytes outside the two intended integration files

## Immutability

Confirmed exact for both worktrees:

- HEAD, branch, status
- tracked/staged diffs
- cache/environment/build-excluded source hashes and modes

Also unchanged:

- live gateway PID/process
- live `config.yaml`
- live `.nutricoach-bot.env`

Ignored cache/build churn occurred independently; no source changed. No service, watcher, Telegram, git state, live data, or Todo14 action was touched.

## Evidence

`/home/cube/projects/richard/.senpi-evidence/st_01a0405c-channel-inbox-forward-port-strict-refresh`

Sandbox diff SHA-256:

`e072024d65f01790a3cdcb77d1ed584d7170165897bf64ee6faff19d256327c2`

The disposable sandbox was removed. Architectural review is otherwise clean: responsibilities are split, boundaries use typed JSON/Protocols, authority and migration requests are frozen, parameter bloat is removed, and behavioral coverage is deterministic.


I read this as the definitive current-source qualification - I’ll snapshot protected source-only state, reconstruct the exact port in a fresh sandbox with the revised handler ordering and startup seam, run the specified behavioral and diff-aware static gates, freeze a new evidence set, and remove the sandbox.


The semantic port now preserves the v1.4 command-registration calls while enforcing the repaired startup order: initialize, channel authority, membership subscription, application start, recovery, then polling/webhook. The text path no longer has a merge conflict; current source naturally places reservation after nutrition handling while non-text handlers remain fail-closed.


Behavioral, ordering, Ruff, `ty`, new-module basedpyright, no-excuse, compile, and LOC gates are all clean. The decisive diff-aware gate is not: 43 diagnostics fall directly on added integration lines—40 in `TelegramAdapter`, 3 in `TelegramCustomerTransport`—so this run is heading to FAIL unless the protected source changed before sealing.


I read this as the final current-source qualification - the proof is complete, evidence is frozen, and the sandbox is removed.

# Result: FAIL

All behavioral and new-module quality gates pass. The mandatory diff-aware integration basedpyright gate does not.

## Passing gates

- Compile: baseline and ported clean
- Isolated feature tests: **27 passed**
- Reverse-order feature run: **27 passed**
- Explicit real-PTB scenarios: **6 passed**
- Related topic/reply/delivery tests:
  - baseline: **169 passed**
  - ported: **169 passed**
- Weekly/nutrition tests:
  - baseline: **99 passed**
  - ported: **99 passed**
- Ruff: clean
- Split-root `ty`: both roots clean
- basedpyright on four new production modules: **0 errors**
- No-excuse: zero violations
- New-file LOC: within limit
  - `test_channel_inbox_migration.py` is in the 214-line warning band
- Startup ordering and all v1.4 weekly/trainer branches were preserved.

## Blocker

Diff-aware basedpyright on common integration:

- Inherited baseline aggregate: **6,937 errors**
- Ported aggregate: **6,976 errors**
- Net increase: **39**
- Diagnostics directly on added lines: **43**
  - `gateway/platforms/telegram.py`: 40
  - `gateway/platforms/nutrition_coaching.py`: 3

The added-line map includes unresolved `Any`/unknown typing around:

- channel config access and `matches_chat`
- Telegram bot authority probes
- application start/shutdown
- callback reservation
- non-text reservation calls
- customer transport metadata/thread kwargs

Therefore the required zero feature-caused added-line result was not reproduced.

## Immutability

Confirmed exact before/after:

- Both worktree HEADs, branches, statuses, diffs, source hashes, and modes
- Live gateway PID/process
- Live config and NutriCoach environment file
- No service, watcher, Telegram, git-state, live-profile, or Todo14 action

## Evidence

`/home/cube/projects/richard/.senpi-evidence/st_01a0405c-channel-inbox-forward-port-final-v3`

Important artifacts:

- `basedpyright-added-line-errors.txt`
- `basedpyright-added-line-by-file.txt`
- `telegram.py.added-ranges`
- `nutrition_coaching.py.added-ranges`
- `sandbox.diff`
- complete baseline/ported test and static logs

Sandbox diff SHA-256:

`0c052ccb58335978868ca3c49c6d5e46bb753a5e8cbb790d78f0647a7974d8b7`

Architectural review otherwise passes: responsibilities are split, migration uses canonical `RegistryDocument`, authority and requests are frozen, boundaries are typed, parameter bloat is removed, tests are deterministic, and no escape hatches remain.


I read this as a focused type-resolution investigation - I’ll recreate and retain the current semantic-port sandbox, reproduce only the basedpyright integration diagnostics, trace symbol/import resolution under the exact v1.4 config, and map each error family to its smallest source-level correction.


The first root cause is already visible: v1.4 defines PTB imports inside a broad `try/except ImportError` whose fallback assigns `Application`, `Bot`, and message classes to `Any`; basedpyright must merge both branches. Separately, feature code uses string-based `getattr` for attributes that are class-annotated, which discards those annotations and returns `Any`. I’m recreating the exact port and testing minimal corrections in sibling probe copies.


I read this as a narrow refresh of the retained diagnostic sandbox - I’ll rebuild a `latest-ported` sibling from the newest v1.5 bytes, preserve the same v1.4 conflict resolutions, run only the common-surface basedpyright plus added-line mapper, and report exact residual diagnostics without removing the sandbox.


I read this as a latest-source diagnostic refresh - the retained sandbox now contains the newest semantic port and its exact added-line results.

# Remaining result

Latest repairs reduced added-line diagnostics from **43 to 17**.

- Aggregate baseline: 6,937
- Latest port: 6,949
- Net aggregate increase: 12
- Diagnostics directly on added lines: **17**

No behavioral or other quality gates were rerun.

## Root-cause groups

### 1. Dynamic config access discards the protocol type — 11 errors

`ChannelInboxRuntimeConfig`, `ChannelInboxConfig`, and `ChannelInboxRuntimeAuthority` resolve correctly. They do not become `Any`.

The type is lost through:

```python
config = getattr(self, "_channel_inbox_config", None)
```

Because string-based `getattr` returns `Any`, subsequent `enabled`, `matches_chat`, IDs, and `runtime_matches` accesses are also `Any`.

Exact lines:

- `telegram.py:959`
- `telegram.py:961`
- `telegram.py:968`
- `telegram.py:990`
- `telegram.py:992`
- `telegram.py:2979`
- `telegram.py:2993` ×2
- `telegram.py:2997` ×2
- `telegram.py:3009`

Smallest fix:

```python
config = self._channel_inbox_config
```

Also access the annotated boolean directly:

```python
self._channel_inbox_authority_verified
```

The class attributes are already correctly annotated as `ChannelInboxRuntimeConfig | None` and `bool`.

### 2. Callback query remains PTB `Any` — 2 errors

Exact lines:

- `telegram.py:12530` — `getattr(query, "from_user", None)` is `Any` even when passed through `cast`
- `telegram.py:12534` — `query.answer` is `Any`

Smallest fix:

- Add one runtime-checkable callback protocol containing typed `from_user` and `answer`.
- Narrow `query` once with `isinstance`.
- Pass its typed `from_user` directly.
- Acknowledge through its typed `answer` or `_acknowledge_callback_best_effort`.

Casting an `Any` input does not clear `reportAny` under this basedpyright configuration.

### 3. Nutrition transport provider seam is incomplete — 3 errors

Exact lines:

- `nutrition_coaching.py:21632` — private protocol method accessed outside its declaring protocol
- `nutrition_coaching.py:21644`
- `nutrition_coaching.py:21645` — `_thread_kwargs_for_send` remains unknown, so the result has no typed `get`

Smallest cohesive fix:

Expose one public adapter capability:

```python
def channel_inbox_delivery_kwargs(
    self,
    chat_id: int | str,
    topic_id: int | str,
) -> dict[str, int | None]: ...
```

Have `TelegramAdapter` combine channel metadata with `_thread_kwargs_for_send` internally. The transport protocol then calls only this public typed method. This removes both private-member and unknown-return diagnostics without exposing two private adapter internals.

### 4. Wrong `Awaitable` import root — 1 error

Exact line:

- `nutrition_coaching.py:23`

`Awaitable` was added from `typing`, which strict Python 3.12 configuration marks deprecated.

Smallest fix:

```python
from collections.abc import Awaitable
```

Remove it from the `typing` import.

## PTB/module-resolution diagnosis

Exact command:

```bash
PYTHONPATH=dualcoach/profile \
/home/cube/.local/bin/basedpyright \
  --pythonpath .venv/bin/python \
  gateway/platforms/telegram.py \
  gateway/platforms/nutrition_coaching.py
```

Configuration:

- `typeCheckingMode: all`
- Python 3.12
- venv: `.venv`
- `extraPaths: ["dualcoach/profile"]`

Resolution is correct:

- `telegram` and `telegram.ext` resolve from the v1.4 `.venv`
- channel modules resolve from the retained sandbox
- migration modules resolve from `dualcoach/profile`

Direct reveal results:

- `Bot`: `type[Bot]`
- `Application`: `type[Application[Unknown, ...]]`
- `ChannelInboxConfig`: `type[ChannelInboxConfig]`
- `ChannelInboxRuntimeAuthority`: typed class

Inside legacy `telegram.py`, guarded imports merge with the `except ImportError` aliases:

- `Bot`: `type[Bot] | type[Any]`
- `Application`: typed generic class unioned with `type[Any]`

The new local PTB probe/application protocols successfully removed those previous authority/startup diagnostics. Remaining PTB-related errors are confined to the callback query seam.

## Retained paths

Latest exact semantic port:

`/home/cube/projects/richard/.senpi-sandboxes/st_01a0405c-channel-inbox-diagnose-v4/latest-ported`

Other retained diagnostic states:

- `ported` — pre-repair exact port
- `probe-direct-attrs`
- `probe-symbols`
- `baseline`

Diagnostic evidence:

`/home/cube/projects/richard/.senpi-evidence/st_01a0405c-channel-inbox-diagnose-v4`

Exact map:

- `latest-added-line-errors.txt`
- `latest-telegram.py.added-ranges`
- `latest-nutrition_coaching.py.added-ranges`

Neither worktree nor live/service/watcher paths were modified.


I read this as a conditional final qualification - I’ll refresh the retained `latest-ported` sandbox from the newest source, run only the added-line basedpyright gate first, and proceed to the full suite, final evidence sealing, and diagnostic-sandbox cleanup only if that map is empty.


The first map is nonzero, so the full suite remains gated off. Five of six entries are merge-artifact false positives: adding `runtime_checkable` onto v1.4’s legacy typing-import line causes inherited deprecation diagnostics to land on an “added” line. I’m preserving that original line byte-for-byte and placing `runtime_checkable` on the adjacent override import, then rerunning the same checker to isolate the true residual.


I read this as a conditional gate run - the final diff-aware result is nonzero, so I stopped before the full suite.

# Result: FAIL — 1 added-line error

After preserving the v1.4 typing import line to eliminate five merge-artifact diagnostics:

- Baseline aggregate: **6,937**
- Ported aggregate: **6,927**
- Feature-caused added-line errors: **1**

Exact diagnostic:

```text
gateway/platforms/telegram.py:12563:21
reportUnusedCallResult: result of type object is unused
```

Source:

```python
await channel_query.answer()
```

Smallest fix:

```python
_ = await channel_query.answer()
```

The callback protocol declares `answer() -> object`, so strict basedpyright requires deliberate consumption.

## Conditional outcome

Because the count is not zero:

- Complete gate suite was **not run**
- No final PASS evidence was sealed
- Diagnostic sandbox was kept

Sandbox:

`/home/cube/projects/richard/.senpi-sandboxes/st_01a0405c-channel-inbox-diagnose-v4/latest-ported`

Evidence and exact map:

`/home/cube/projects/richard/.senpi-evidence/st_01a0405c-channel-inbox-final-pass-v5`

- `basedpyright-added-line-errors-r2.txt`
- `basedpyright-added-line-summary-r2.txt`
- `r2-telegram.py.added-ranges`
- `r2-nutrition_coaching.py.added-ranges`

Both worktree git states, live process, live config, and live environment file remain exact and untouched.


I read this as the final conditional execution - I’ll sync the one acknowledged callback-result change into the retained port, rerun the added-line gate, and if it is zero continue in the same run through every behavioral/static gate, evidence sealing, sandbox cleanup, and protected-path verification.


The decisive gate is clean: **0 added-line diagnostics**, with inherited aggregate errors decreasing from 6,937 to 6,926. Per your condition, I’m continuing immediately with the complete final suite before sealing and cleanup.


Every full gate is now green: compile, both 27-test orders, six PTB scenarios, 169 related, 99 weekly, Ruff, both `ty` roots, new-module basedpyright, no-excuse, and LOC. I’m freezing the final sandbox diff and hashes, verifying protected state against the post-repair snapshots, then removing the retained diagnostic sandbox tree.


I read this as the final conditional qualification - the zero gate triggered the complete suite, which passed.

# PASS

Diff-aware basedpyright:

- Added-line diagnostics: **0**
- Inherited baseline aggregate: 6,937
- Ported aggregate: 6,926

Full verification:

- Compile: clean
- Feature tests: **27 passed**
- Reverse-order feature tests: **27 passed**
- Explicit PTB scenarios: **6 passed**
- Related tests: **169 baseline / 169 ported**
- Weekly tests: **99 baseline / 99 ported**
- Ruff: clean
- Split-root `ty`: clean
- New-module basedpyright: clean
- No-excuse: clean
- LOC: clean

Both worktrees remained byte/status exact. The live process, configuration, service, and watcher were untouched and remained unchanged.

Final evidence:

`/home/cube/projects/richard/.senpi-evidence/st_01a0405c-channel-inbox-final-pass-v6`

Sandbox diff SHA-256:

`72069ddae3cef3d5b05de58ee4af749e36e508c6874bc81e590ed2bcca1250c5`

All retained channel-inbox diagnostic sandboxes were removed.

Architectural review: new modules retain focused responsibilities, typed boundaries isolate legacy SDK dynamism, migration authority remains canonical and frozen, and tests are deterministic. `test_channel_inbox_migration.py` is at 214 pure LOC; split it before the next line-adding change.


I read this as a fresh privacy-repair qualification - I’ll rebuild the exact current semantic port from v1.4 bytes, require a zero added-line map first, then continue without pause through all three 29-test orders and the complete prior gate suite before sealing and cleanup.


The privacy-repair port retains a zero added-line map, with inherited aggregate diagnostics again decreasing by 11. I’m continuing directly through the full suite, including all three 29-test root orders.


The privacy-repair suite is fully green: all three orders pass 29/29, the explicit PTB and baseline-comparison suites are unchanged, and every static gate is clean. I’m sealing the new source/sandbox evidence, verifying protected state, and removing the disposable sandbox.


A protected-source race occurred during sealing: the v1.5 tracked diff changed while the full suite was running, so I will not label the tested sandbox as the current source. The sandbox is still retained; I’m identifying whether the concurrent delta affects this feature before deciding whether the qualification must be refreshed.


The current worktree changed during sealing, reverting `_channel_inbox_reserves_ingress` to string-based `getattr`. I refreshed the sandbox to that exact current byte and reran the prerequisite: it now has **3 added-line errors**, so the zero condition is false and the prior full-suite result cannot qualify the current source.


I read this as a zero-gated final qualification - the current source fails the prerequisite, so the current-source full suite was not run.

# FAIL

During evidence sealing, the v1.5 worktree changed from:

```python
config = self._channel_inbox_config
```

to:

```python
config = getattr(self, "_channel_inbox_config", None)
```

After refreshing the sandbox to that exact current byte:

- Baseline aggregate: 6,937
- Ported aggregate: 6,929
- Added-line diagnostics: **3**

Exact map:

```text
gateway/platforms/telegram.py:967:55  reportAny: matches_chat is Any
gateway/platforms/telegram.py:969:16  reportAny: enabled is Any
gateway/platforms/telegram.py:976:17  Argument type is Any
```

Root cause: string-based `getattr` discards the existing `ChannelInboxRuntimeConfig | None` class annotation.

Required fix:

```python
config = self._channel_inbox_config
```

The earlier 29/29 and complete suite passed against the immediately preceding bytes, but cannot qualify the changed current source. Per the zero prerequisite, the current-source full suite, PASS sealing, and sandbox removal were skipped.

Current sandbox:

`/home/cube/projects/richard/.senpi-sandboxes/st_01a0405c-channel-inbox-final-v7/ported`

Exact current diagnostic evidence:

`/home/cube/projects/richard/.senpi-evidence/st_01a0405c-channel-inbox-current-race-v8`

Both worktree git states, live process, service configuration, and environment remained unchanged during this refreshed check.


I read this as a race-sensitive final qualification - I’ll refresh the retained v7 overlay to the frozen latest byte, bracket each port/type/behavior/static/sealing phase with identical source-aware worktree hashes, abort on any mismatch, then seal and remove the sandbox only after every gate passes.


I read this as a superseding frozen-byte qualification - I’ll discard the interrupted phase snapshot, rebuild the retained port from the new typed-default source, restart phase hashing from that frozen state, require zero added-line errors, then run the full suite with three 30-test orders before sealing and cleanup.


Phase 0 refresh and Phase 1 diff-aware typing are both hash-stable. The added-line map is zero, with aggregate inherited errors decreasing from 6,937 to 6,926; I’m moving into the hash-bracketed behavioral phase now.


Phase 2 is hash-stable and fully green: all three orders pass 30/30, PTB 6/6, related 169/169, and weekly 99/99. I’m running the static phase under the same before/after worktree hash lock.


I read this as a superseding frozen-byte run with a broader static prerequisite - I’ll restart phase hashes from the newest callback/error bytes, rebuild the semantic port, require both zero added-line basedpyright and zero diff-aware no-excuse findings across the modified integration files, then run the full suite and seal only if every phase hash remains identical.


The refreshed source passes both prerequisite maps under stable hashes: **0 basedpyright added-line errors** and **0 no-excuse findings on modified integration lines**. Inherited aggregate basedpyright again decreases to 6,926; I’m proceeding directly to the full behavioral phase.


Behavior is phase-hash stable: three 30/30 orders, PTB 6/6, related 169/169, and weekly 99/99. I’m running the final new-file Ruff/type/no-excuse/LOC phase now.


Static Phase 3 is hash-stable and clean, including zero diff-aware integration no-excuse findings and zero new-file violations. I’m sealing Phase 4 under one final hash bracket, then removing the sandbox and confirming the frozen worktrees and live process.


I read this as the definitive frozen-byte qualification - all phases completed against stable source hashes.

# PASS

Every phase’s pre/post worktree hash matched exactly.

## Zero-gate results

- Added-line basedpyright: **0**
- Diff-aware integration no-excuse: **0**
- Inherited basedpyright:
  - baseline: 6,937
  - ported: 6,926

## Complete suite

- Compile: clean
- Feature order 1: **30 passed**
- Feature order 2: **30 passed**
- Feature order 3: **30 passed**
- Explicit PTB: **6 passed**
- Related: **169 baseline / 169 ported**
- Weekly: **99 baseline / 99 ported**
- Ruff: clean
- Split-root `ty`: clean
- New-module basedpyright: clean
- New-file no-excuse: clean
- LOC: clean

## Integrity

- Source hashes stable across refresh, diff-static, behavior, static, and sealing phases
- Both worktrees byte/status exact
- Live process, service configuration, and watcher remained unchanged
- Disposable sandbox removed
- No channel-inbox sandbox remains

## Evidence

`/home/cube/projects/richard/.senpi-evidence/st_01a0405c-channel-inbox-final-pass-v11`

Sandbox diff SHA-256:

`105f147dc2f05ff865fb4704d36140f35938e1b008292d57c3bd4409206982ea`

Architectural review is clean: typed authority failure replaces the generic error, callback acknowledgement has an exact result type, dynamic SDK boundaries remain isolated, and privacy routing fails closed. `test_channel_inbox_migration.py` remains in the 217-line warning band; split before its next line-adding change.


I read this as a new cross-domain qualification of the bounded multi-customer extension - I’ll inventory the exact current delta, reconstruct it over fresh v1.4 bytes while preserving weekly/channel semantics, run zero-gates before the expanded profile/gateway/lifecycle matrix, then seal evidence and remove the sandbox only if every blocker is clear.


The delta now spans five tracked integration files plus bounded-admission modules and tests; both `customer_admin.py` and `customer_coaching.py` overlap v1.4 weekly work, so I’m treating them as semantic three-way merges rather than copying v1.5 wholesale. I’ll first freeze source-aware hashes and enumerate every conflict before testing.


The semantic merge required only two additional resolutions beyond the channel work: retain `WeeklyCoordinatorHost` while adding admission-policy protocols, and initialize weekly host authority before enforcing candidate-bound admission. All other bounded-registry/profile changes merged cleanly. I’m now zero-gating every modified tracked file, including the changed gateway test surface.


The prerequisite zero-gate is blocked by the exact current feature bytes: **46 added-line basedpyright errors and 11 added-line no-excuse violations**. Because the requested ordering makes zero a hard prerequisite, I will not run compile or behavioral suites against a non-qualifying port. I’m collecting the remaining independent static/LOC blockers now so the failure report is complete rather than stopping at the first diagnostic.


Independent static gates are otherwise clean: Ruff, split-root `ty`, all 16 new-file no-excuse checks, and six new production modules under basedpyright pass. The complete blocker set is confined to added integration/test lines: 20 diagnostics in `customer_admin.py`, one in `customer_coaching.py`, 25 in `test_nutrition_coaching.py`, plus nine `no-object` and two broad-except violations in `customer_admin.py`. I’m freezing that failed qualification and removing the sandbox without running gated behavior.


I read this as a final qualification report - the new port is blocked at the mandatory zero-gate.

# FAIL — prerequisite zero-gate

The exact-current bounded multi-customer port produced:

- Added-line basedpyright: **46**
  - `customer_admin.py`: 20
  - `customer_coaching.py`: 1
  - `test_nutrition_coaching.py`: 25
- Diff-aware no-excuse: **11**
  - `no-object`: 9
  - `broad-except`: 2
- Aggregate diagnostics:
  - baseline: 9,066
  - ported: 9,083

Primary basedpyright categories include 26 `reportAny`, nine unused call results, two deprecated typing imports, and one unannotated class attribute.

Independent gates passed:

- Ruff: clean
- Split-root new-file `ty`: clean
- New production-module basedpyright: clean
- All 16 new-file no-excuse checks: clean

Per the required ordering, compile, behavioral suites, and disposable lifecycle were **not run** after the zero-gate failed.

Integrity:

- All executed phase hashes remained stable
- Neither source worktree was edited
- Worktree status and tracked diffs remained exact
- Live PID, service configuration, sensitive environment, and watcher state were untouched
- Sandbox removed; no multi-customer sandbox remains

Evidence:

`/home/cube/projects/richard/.senpi-evidence/st_01a0405c-multi-customer-final-v12`

Sandbox diff SHA-256:

`fa80e735c971aa9ad6a5eb7f56ec30301e8f7232e9e0c4fd2238261c0d504f8f`


I read this as a fresh full qualification of the repaired exact-current bytes - I’ll create new evidence and sandboxes from current v1.4, semantically merge all current feature deltas, re-run zero-gates under stable hashes, then execute every deferred suite and lifecycle scenario before sealing and cleanup.


The fresh merge has five localized conflict groups: weekly-host inheritance/initialization, Telegram startup/command/thread branches, repaired profile typing imports, and test fixtures that need both v1.4 trainer/weekly fields and bounded-customer types. All are resolved without dropping either branch; source hashes remained stable. I’m running the mandatory added-line gates now.


The repaired zero-gate passes: **0 added-line basedpyright**, **0 diff-aware no-excuse**, with aggregate diagnostics improving from 9,066 to 9,035. I’ve reconstructed the requested fixed matrices as 15 multi-profile cases, 198 customer admin/coaching/schedule/staff cases, 35 mixed gateway cases per order, the explicit six-case PTB surface, the established 169 related cases, and the established 99 weekly cases. I’m executing them under isolated basetemps and one hash bracket.


The broad matrices pass, but all three mixed orders expose the same semantic merge defect: the v1.4 fixture retains topic `"101"` while the repaired bounded-customer assertion hard-codes `"customer-topic"`. Production routing is correct; I’m making the minimal merge-only test adaptation to resolve through the fixture’s canonical topic, then re-running the zero-gate and only the affected orders. Baseline compile will also be recaptured against baseline-present files only; its initial command emitted harmless missing-feature notices.


After the merge-only fixture correction, zero-gates remain at 0/0 and all three mixed orders pass **35/35**. The deferred matrices are clean: multi-profile 15, customer domains 198, real PTB 6, related 169/169, weekly 99/99, and both compile targets. I’m running the disposable lifecycle threat matrix and final static/LOC gates now.


Final static gates pass; all new files remain below the 250 pure-LOC hard limit. The lifecycle command itself hit a pytest collection namespace collision when profile and gateway `tests` packages were combined in one process—not a product failure. I’m rerunning the same 14 disposable scenarios in two isolated processes, which also directly verifies the repaired module-purge boundary.


The isolated disposable lifecycle passes **10 profile lifecycle cases plus 4 candidate-authority cases**, covering legacy-first capacity upgrade, two receipts, recovery/restart states, wrong approval/candidate, stale/tampered authority, and both migration/activation rollback. I’m sealing manifests and final immutability evidence now, then removing the fresh sandbox.


Sealing passed all immutability comparisons, but sandbox deletion encountered permission-sealed lifecycle artifacts, as expected from the rollback/tamper tests. I’m clearing write protection only inside the disposable sandbox, completing removal, and finishing the post-removal hash bracket and evidence digest.


I read this as the definitive fresh qualification result - the repaired forward-port passes every required gate.

# PASS

- Added-line basedpyright: **0**
- Diff-aware no-excuse: **0**
- Aggregate diagnostics: **9,066 baseline / 9,035 ported**
- Compile: clean baseline and ported
- Multi-profile: **15 passed**
- Customer admin/coaching/schedule/staff: **198 passed**
- Channel/mixed gateway orders: **35/35**, **35/35**, **35/35**
- Real PTB: **6 passed**
- Related: **169 baseline / 169 ported**
- Weekly: **99 baseline / 99 ported**
- Disposable lifecycle:
  - profile migration/receipts/recovery/tamper/rollback: **10 passed**
  - candidate authority/restart boundary: **4 passed**
- Ruff, split `ty`, new-module basedpyright, new-file no-excuse: clean
- LOC hard gate: clean

All source hashes remained stable for the entire run. Both worktrees, live service PID/config/environment, and watcher remained exact. The permission-sealed disposable artifacts were made writable only inside the sandbox; the sandbox was then removed completely.

No remaining blockers.

Evidence:

`/home/cube/projects/richard/.senpi-evidence/st_01a0405c-multi-customer-final-v13`

Evidence manifest SHA-256:

`369cbe592d2194d7d8757ce5c12a60d55ee0848e93de113694cbcc9745dd4ef3`

Sandbox diff SHA-256:

`ec71cc0c350d35cd8fd2bafccb59c4aafc2f5343261e9e6b273d2448d4b15d25`


I read this as a wholly fresh v14 qualification of the newly formatted current source - I’ll rebuild from current v1.4 bytes, repeat the complete behavioral/static matrix, and add separate lint, new-file formatting, inherited-format parity, added-range formatter-intersection, and exact source-set digest evidence.


The fresh v14 semantic merge is reconstructed from source and v1.4 only, including the canonical-topic merge adaptation discovered in v13. Before behavior, I’m jointly qualifying zero-gates and the new formatting contract: lint, all-new-file format checks, inherited baseline/ported full-file parity, and formatter-hunk intersection against added ranges.


The formatting prerequisite stopped on the added-range intersection check, but the first implementation treated every line inside a unified-diff hunk—including unchanged context—as formatter delta. That over-reports thousands of inherited lines. Lint, all 16 new-file format checks, and zero-gates are clean; I’m recalculating intersection from actual removed/inserted formatter lines only before deciding whether there is a real blocker.


The precise check confirms a real formatting blocker, not context noise: Ruff would alter feature-added lines in inherited files (for example, receipt comprehensions and committed-payload construction in `customer_admin.py`). Full-file format status is baseline-parity for all five inherited files, but added-range format is not clean. Zero-gates, lint, and all-new-file formatting remain clean. I’ll still run the complete matrix and remaining static gates so the final report contains every blocker at once.


The entire fresh behavior matrix passes under stable hashes despite the formatting blocker: compile clean, 15, 198, 35×3, 6, 169/169, 99/99, and lifecycle 10+4. I’m completing split typing, new-module analysis, no-excuse, and LOC before freezing the failed formatting qualification and cleaning the sandbox.


All remaining static gates pass; the LOC hard gate is clean for new files. The sole qualification blocker is formatting on inherited-file added ranges: 145 formatter-changed added lines across four files, while all five inherited files retain baseline full-file format parity. I’m freezing that exact failed result, proving source/live/watcher immutability, and removing the fresh sandbox.


I read this as the fresh v14 qualification result - behavior passes, but the explicit added-range formatting gate blocks qualification.

# FAIL — added-range formatting

## Formatting

- `ruff_lint=clean`
- `new_files_format=clean` — all 16 new Python files
- `inherited_full_format=baseline_parity`
  - All five inherited files return the same full-file format status in baseline and ported trees
- `added_ranges_format=FAIL`
  - 145 feature-added lines would be changed by Ruff:
    - `customer_admin.py`: 76
    - `nutrition_coaching.py`: 1
    - `telegram.py`: 49
    - `test_nutrition_coaching.py`: 19

## All other gates

- Added-line basedpyright: **0**
- Diff-aware no-excuse: **0**
- Compile: clean
- Multi: **15**
- Related profile: **198**
- Mixed gateway: **35/35 × 3**
- PTB: **6**
- Related: **169 baseline / 169 ported**
- Weekly: **99 baseline / 99 ported**
- Lifecycle: **10 + 4**
- Split `ty`: clean
- New-module basedpyright: clean
- New-file no-excuse: clean
- New-file LOC hard gate: clean

Source hashes were stable throughout. Both worktrees, live service, configuration, environment, and watcher remained exact. The fresh sandbox was removed.

## Evidence

Path:

`/home/cube/projects/richard/.senpi-evidence/st_01a0405c-multi-customer-final-v14`

Manifest SHA-256:

`d3b30c6a4dd55f172e443ebd6087e4b1f3c8832260a0e68babe27273d5a95b83`

Sandbox diff SHA-256:

`ac6a51a61cd051e2086e21d98db5b9bf9abd111c4fd70ab0d8ce3c89f0edaa27`

Exact current source-set SHA-256:

`7873bc9d8f4a0dcbc28826bcbe3c8dd49d9fe3e3af12807a0c70fd7d04afe3a8`

Sole blocker: format the feature-added sections in the four inherited files listed above.


I read this as the definitive fresh v15 qualification of the surgically formatted source - I’ll rebuild from current v1.4 bytes, re-establish the semantic merge, execute every v14 gate including precise formatter-line intersection, then seal evidence and remove the sandbox only after final immutability checks.


The source-side formatter repair changes conflict shape in the inherited integrations, so I resolved against the newly formatted structures rather than replaying v14 bytes. The fresh port is hash-stable; I’m now running zero-gates and the precise formatting contract before any behavioral acceptance.


The prerequisite run exposes a regression in the exact current formatter repair: line-based zero-gates now classify 44 basedpyright diagnostics and one generic-exception finding on newly formatted feature hunks. One reported formatter intersection is an insertion-mapping artifact, so I’m correcting that measurement with sequence alignment and restoring the required semantic merge treatment of the legacy typing import before determining the final blocker set.


The corrected formatter measurement is clean—exactly **0** formatter-changed feature-added lines—and lint/new-file/full-file parity all pass. The mandatory zero-gate is still blocked by current formatted inherited hunks: **39 added-line basedpyright diagnostics** (34 Telegram, 5 nutrition test) and **1 generic RuntimeError no-excuse violation**. I will not run compile or behavioral suites past a failed zero prerequisite; I’m collecting the independent ty/new-module/LOC gates, then sealing and cleaning the fresh sandbox.


Independent static gates are clean. The complete blocker set is therefore fixed at 39 added-line basedpyright diagnostics plus one inherited-integration no-excuse finding; formatting itself now fully satisfies the v15 contract. I’m freezing the BLOCKED evidence, proving source/live/service/watcher exactness, and removing the fresh sandbox.


I read this as the final v15 qualification result - current source is BLOCKED at the mandatory zero-gate.

# BLOCKED — zero-gate

## Blockers

- Added-line basedpyright: **39**
  - `gateway/platforms/telegram.py`: 34
  - `tests/gateway/test_nutrition_coaching.py`: 5
- Diff-aware no-excuse: **1**
  - `nutrition_coaching.py:21664`: generic `RuntimeError`

Because the zero-gate failed, compile and behavioral matrices were not run.

## Formatting contract

- `ruff_lint=clean`
- `new_files_format=clean` — all 16 new Python files
- `inherited_full_format=baseline_parity`
- `formatter_changed_feature_added_lines=0`

Independent gates passed:

- Split `ty`: clean
- New-module basedpyright: clean
- New-file no-excuse: clean
- New-file LOC: clean

All executed phase hashes remained stable. Worktrees, live service, config/environment, and watcher remained exact. The fresh sandbox was removed.

## Evidence

Path:

`/home/cube/projects/richard/.senpi-evidence/st_01a0405c-multi-customer-final-v15`

Manifest SHA-256:

`302e00db481b62abfbe7f80a32c059e979b4b59f25a09fcc75ba4bb7ce0ffdeb`

Sandbox diff SHA-256:

`1893d68d6fed16ef103fd0f73951d60462beeb0911f28b33eab7ec2c6b7022fe`

Exact current source-set SHA-256:

`bc9cab99d1358044b1b8a6250938bf0bd72e1e94144a49af1bbd1048ed4cd650`


I read this as the definitive fresh v16 qualification of the typed post-format repair - I’ll rebuild from current v1.4 bytes, require all static/format zero-gates simultaneously, run the complete matrix only after they pass, measure full nutrition-suite drift baseline versus ported separately, then seal immutability evidence and remove the sandbox.


The typed repair adds explicit `JsonValue` boundaries and removes the ambiguous top-level activation import, creating six test-merge conflicts in addition to the established weekly/channel conflicts. I retained v1.4 committed-activation fixtures, trainer/week fields, and canonical topic routing while carrying the repaired typing. The fresh port is hash-stable; simultaneous zero/format gates run now.


WebSocket error


The simultaneous gates are down to five merge-context findings: four callback typing/use-result issues and one generic `RuntimeError` on the new exact-topic boundary. Each has a behavior-preserving typed resolution available in the port (`_CallbackAnswerQuery`, direct protocol narrowing, and the existing `NutritionCoachingIntegrationError` subclass). I’m applying those minimal semantic adaptations, then re-running all simultaneous gates before proceeding.


All simultaneous prerequisites now pass together: based added 0, no-excuse added 0, formatter-changed added lines 0, lint clean, 16/16 new files fully formatted, and inherited full-format baseline parity. I’m running the complete behavior matrix plus a separate baseline/ported full `test_nutrition_coaching.py` drift comparison.


The full matrix passes under stable hashes. The separate full nutrition suite has no failing drift: **74 baseline / 75 ported**, with the single additional ported case being the bounded-customer selection test. I’m completing split typing, new-module basedpyright, new-file no-excuse, and LOC, then sealing final evidence.


Final static gates pass and every executed phase remains source-hash stable. I’m re-recording inherited full-format parity after the last typed merge adaptation, freezing the port and exact-current manifests, verifying both worktrees/live/service/config/environment/watcher byte-for-byte, then removing the sandbox.


I read this as the definitive v16 qualification result - all mandatory gates pass.

# PASS

- Added-line basedpyright: **0**
- Diff-aware no-excuse: **0**
- Formatter-changed added lines: **0**
- Ruff lint: clean
- All 16 new files: fully formatted
- Inherited full-file format: baseline parity
- Compile: clean baseline and ported
- Multi: **15 passed**
- Profile: **198 passed**
- Mixed gateway: **35 × 3 passed**
- PTB: **6 passed**
- Related: **169 baseline / 169 ported**
- Weekly: **99 baseline / 99 ported**
- Lifecycle: **10 + 4 passed**
- Split `ty`, new-module basedpyright, new-file no-excuse, and LOC: clean

Full nutrition suite, recorded separately:

- Baseline: **74 passed**
- Ported: **75 passed**
- Baseline-equivalent failures: **0**
- Expected feature delta: **+1 bounded-customer selection test**

All source hashes remained stable. Both worktrees, live service, config/environment, and watcher remained exact. Sandbox removed.

Evidence:

`/home/cube/projects/richard/.senpi-evidence/st_01a0405c-multi-customer-final-v16`

Manifest SHA-256:

`0eb9eae8617e26c2fc4bd2fb3a2c3827c27d9d26658d934f3abab0b6d0cf1340`

Sandbox diff SHA-256:

`d7ffcbdf753de4313330350a9e9f12af4ab723a8add70d663d481275ad52bff3`

Exact current source-set SHA-256:

`6997ace19060619f45a8bf2bd53856cbf49f8c493c33f5788efc1bfaaac5aa1c`


I read this as the definitive fresh v17 qualification with receipt-consistency enforcement - I’ll rebuild from current source and v1.4, run every gate anew, write one canonical final summary, derive qualification receipts from it, and fail sealing unless per-file added-line counts, aggregate receipt, canonical summary, and qualification all agree exactly.


The one-line `send_kwargs.update(...)` repair is present in the fresh merged port. All established semantic adaptations are reapplied from current inputs, not prior artifacts, and source hashes remain stable. I’m running simultaneous zero/format/lint gates and emitting independent per-file plus aggregate based-added receipts for later canonical-summary consistency auditing.


All simultaneous prerequisites pass, and every per-file based-added receipt is independently 0 with aggregate sum 0. I’m running the full behavioral matrix plus separate 74/75 nutrition qualification now; their outputs will feed the single canonical final summary rather than standalone pass claims.


Every behavioral receipt matches the required matrix, including nutrition 74/75. I’m running the remaining strict/LOC gates, then constructing the canonical summary from measured receipts and auditing every duplicated `based_added` value before any PASS seal.


All strict and LOC gates pass under stable hashes. I’m now sealing source/port manifests, validating exact behavioral receipt values, removing the sandbox, then writing the canonical final summary and deriving qualification from it. The final consistency audit will compare six based-added authorities: diagnostic file count, five per-file receipts and their sum, aggregate receipt, prerequisite receipt, canonical summary, and qualification.


I read this as the definitive v17 qualification result - all canonical gates and receipt-consistency checks pass.

# PASS

- Based added: **0**
- No-excuse added: **0**
- Formatter-added changes: **0**
- Ruff lint: clean
- All 16 new files: fully formatted
- Inherited formatting: baseline parity
- Compile: clean
- Multi: **15**
- Profile: **198**
- Mixed: **35 × 3**
- PTB: **6**
- Related: **169/169**
- Weekly: **99/99**
- Lifecycle: **10 + 4**
- Nutrition: **74 baseline / 75 ported**, expected +1
- Strict typing, new-module basedpyright, no-excuse, LOC: clean
- Source hashes stable
- Worktrees, live service/config/env, and watcher exact
- Sandbox removed

## Internal-consistency audit

All based-added authorities agree:

- Diagnostic file: 0
- Per-file sum: 0
- Aggregate receipt: 0
- Prerequisite summary: 0
- Canonical summary: 0
- Qualification: 0
- Canonical summary and qualification: byte-identical

## Evidence

Path:

`/home/cube/projects/richard/.senpi-evidence/st_01a0405c-multi-customer-final-v17`

Manifest SHA-256:

`2f799ea17dfad3b71ce3e07ea78b140f50afeae10b16140a3659f74b84e5dfd7`

Sandbox diff SHA-256:

`d03fd62f2d28847c9e31566eb23517211ebc236fdc3af97ffc9388dd2b868777`

Current source-set SHA-256:

`05def47bc84eedc249dc424b91e25f0a66963d8b6b381cb3a8dad9d3f288a55d`