I read this as an independent release-blocking review - I’ll inspect the uncommitted diff and trace production paths, then run the relevant tests and strict static gates without modifying anything.


I’ve established the feature’s boundary modules and startup wiring. I’m now tracing every ingress/egress caller and migration invariant against the tests, with special attention to paths that bypass the new typed boundary.


The production trace shows registry resolution is the final ingress authority and the scheduled transport re-reads the canonical registry route. I’m moving to executable verification now: focused feature tests, adjacent Telegram/nutrition regressions, compile, Ruff, and the repository’s type checker.


Two release blockers are now confirmed from production flow, not just tests: registered channel-DM non-text updates can enter generic agent dispatch, and background recovery starts before channel-inbox authority verification. I’m completing isolated regression/type runs and checking whether migration authority can be forged coherently.


I read this as a release verdict - I reviewed production paths and independently ran the gates.

# Verdict: FAIL

## Blocking findings

1. **Registered customer non-text updates reach the generic agent.**
   - `_channel_inbox_reserves_ingress()` returns `False` for a registry-resolved customer (`telegram.py:912-923`).
   - Location and media handlers then continue to generic dispatch (`telegram.py:14587-14631`, `14776+`).
   - Independent runtime probe confirmed `handle_message()` was called with normalized source `dm / user 42 / configured chat / configured topic`.
   - This violates the generic-agent isolation boundary.

2. **Channel authority does not gate startup or background transport.**
   - `_connect_channel_inbox_network()` calls full `_connect_network()` before `_verify_channel_inbox_authority()` (`telegram.py:2830-2838`).
   - `_connect_network()` starts the application and calls `_recover_task26_nutrition_background()` at `3104-3105`; polling/webhook and Telegram mutations follow before verification returns.
   - Therefore bot ID, parent channel, candidate, capability digest, and `can_manage_direct_messages` do not gate startup/background recovery as required.

3. **Migration does not validate canonical production registry authority.**
   - `_parse_registry()` only validates generic JSON objects and formatting (`nutricoach_channel_inbox_migration.py:36-46`), not the production registry schema.
   - A minimal non-production registry missing normal canonical fields was accepted, migrated, and approved.
   - `capability_digest` is only checked as 64 hex characters (`:85-95`, `:137-138`); an arbitrary all-zero digest was accepted. Thus the migration cannot prove that capability authority was derived from the configured bot/channel/candidate.
   - Exact hashes, collision checks, consent/enabled checks, exact approval comparison, and byte-identical rollback otherwise work.

4. **The canonical isolated feature test gate fails.**
   - Repository per-file runner: **22 passed, 2 failed**.
   - Both failures are in `test_telegram_channel_inbox_adapter.py`; direct combined pytest passed 24/24, exposing import/order dependence rather than deterministic coverage.
   - Adjacent regression run was also not green: 54 failures across two files; causality was not established.

## Verified as correct

- Default OFF behavior.
- `DirectMessagesTopic.user` supplies canonical customer identity; sender must match.
- Callback parsing uses the clicking actor.
- Accepted `chat.type=channel` messages normalize to private `dm`.
- Runtime authority checks include bot ID, DM parent, loaded candidate, derived capability, `getChat`, and `can_manage_direct_messages`.
- Canonical scheduled channel route emits `direct_messages_topic_id` without `message_thread_id`.
- Runtime resolution uses the customer registry rather than a sidecar.
- Migration code performs no persistence or live/network mutation.

## Static verification

- Ruff: PASS.
- `ty check` with the project environment: PASS.
- `compileall`: PASS.
- `git diff --check`: PASS.

No source, profile, service, watcher, Telegram state, git state, or Todo14 was modified.


I read this as a fresh final qualification of the current worktree - I’ll re-trace the repaired production paths first, then independently run targeted tests and strict static gates, using the v6 evidence only as secondary corroboration.


message: WebSocket error

stop_reason: error


The repaired ingress and startup ordering are present. I’m now exercising the current code independently, including the disabled/revoked scheduled-delivery case that must not degrade a channel route into `message_thread_id`.


The current code fixes the original ingress and startup-order defects, but two blockers remain in the current tree: authority loss still converts a channel destination into `message_thread_id`, and the feature suite remains order-dependent under a normal root pytest invocation. I’m doing the final static/configured checks before issuing the verdict.


I read this as a final current-tree verdict - the repaired paths were re-read and independently exercised.

# Verdict: FAIL

Two blockers remain.

1. **Authority loss misroutes scheduled channel delivery.**
   - `channel_inbox_delivery_kwargs()` falls back to `message_thread_id` whenever channel authority metadata is unavailable (`telegram.py:985-999`).
   - For both disabled and unverified channel configurations, an independently exercised migrated channel route produced:
     ```python
     {"message_thread_id": 9007199254740, "direct_messages_topic_id": None}
     ```
   - `TelegramCustomerTransport` accepts this as an exact destination (`nutrition_coaching.py:21350-21364`).
   - A channel-DM route must use `direct_messages_topic_id` only; disabled or unverified authority must fail closed rather than reinterpret it as a forum thread.

2. **Test-order isolation is still broken.**
   - Per-file isolated runner: **27 passed**.
   - Normal order `migration -> adapter -> ingress`: **27 passed**.
   - Reverse root invocation `ingress -> adapter -> migration`: collection fails with:
     ```text
     ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'checkin_cli.channel_inbox_migration'
     ```
   - `test_channel_inbox_migration.py` inserts the profile path after another test has already cached a different `checkin_cli` package. The v6 reverse-order log passes under its evidence environment, but that does not reproduce normal root pytest behavior.

## Confirmed repaired

- Default OFF.
- Customer identity comes from `DirectMessagesTopic.user`; callback actor is the clicker.
- Admin, location, media, contact, edited, and channel-post ingress cannot reach generic dispatch.
- Channel messages normalize to private DM identity.
- Bot, parent channel, candidate, derived capability, `getChat`, and `can_manage_direct_messages` precede application start, subscriptions, recovery, polling, and webhook startup.
- Migration uses `RegistryDocument`, derived capability authority, exact before/after hashes, collision/consent/enabled checks, proposal integrity, exact approval, and byte-identical rollback.
- Migration remains pure: no persistence, live activation, or network mutation.

## Independent gates

- Ruff: PASS.
- Ty, root and profile modules: PASS.
- Compileall: PASS.
- `git diff --check`: PASS.
- Configured gateway basedpyright: PASS.
- Worktree status remained unchanged; no live profile or network operations were performed.


I read this as verify-and-fix if necessary, then issue a fresh privacy acceptance verdict - I’ll inspect the current repairs, independently exercise both prior failures and all targeted gates, and only edit if the current tree still fails.


Both claimed repairs are present in the current source and have the correct fail-closed shape. I’m executing all three test orders, direct transport probes, and the privacy/static gates now.


The feature suite and repaired probes are clean. A broad combined legacy Telegram invocation showed known cross-file fake-module contamination plus two uninitialized-adapter fixture failures, so I’m isolating those files with the repository’s canonical per-file runner before deciding whether they represent production blockers.


A new compatibility regression surfaced in the real related gate: callback handling crashes for existing partially constructed adapters because `_channel_inbox_reserves_ingress` directly reads a new attribute. I confirmed the RED failure and am applying the minimal backward-compatible lookup, then rerunning both feature and related suites.


The one-line compatibility repair is GREEN: the previously failing callback regression file now passes 46/46, while all three feature orders remain 29/29. I’m running the final isolated related set and confirming the worktree/live-mutation boundary once more.


I read this as final acceptance after repair - both blockers are fixed and all independent gates are green.

# PASS

Repairs verified:

- Disabled or unverified configured inbox routes now raise `RuntimeError`; they never fall back to `message_thread_id`.
- Authorized channel delivery uses only `direct_messages_topic_id`.
- Cached `checkin_cli` modules are purged before canonical profile import.
- Added compatibility lookup prevents existing callback adapters from crashing.

Verification:

- All three feature test orders: **29/29 passed each**.
- Canonical isolated feature run: **29/29 passed**.
- Related Telegram regressions: **104/104 passed**.
- Ruff, Ty root/profile, compileall, basedpyright gateway modules, and `git diff --check`: PASS.
- Default-OFF and fail-closed delivery probes: PASS.
- Migration remains pure with no file, network, service, or live-profile mutation.

Architectural self-review: no new helper, escape hatch, logging, parameter bloat, or untyped boundary was introduced. The one compatibility change is covered by tests that failed before it.


I read this as a frozen read-only requalification - I’ll re-read the current bytes and run non-mutating tests/static checks only, reporting any blocker without editing.


The latest bytes use direct annotated access exactly as stated. I’m validating the frozen tree with cache-disabled, read-only test/static invocations; I will treat uninitialized `object.__new__` fixtures separately from production privacy correctness.


I read this as an exact-current frozen verdict - I’ll re-read the typed defaults and the two regression tests, then rerun only those probes, the three feature orders, and targeted static checks without editing.


I read this as an exact-current extension of the frozen verdict - I’ll re-read the new callback return typing and authority error bytes, then rerun the targeted privacy matrix and static gates without editing.


I read this as exact-current frozen confirmation - latest bytes are verified without edits.

# PASS

Verified latest repairs:

- Typed class defaults preserve `object.__new__` compatibility.
- Callback `answer()` uses `bool | None`.
- `ChannelInboxAuthorityError` fails closed on disabled or unverified delivery.
- No fallback to `message_thread_id` for configured channel routes.
- No privacy regression detected.

Checks:

- Targeted compatibility/authority/callback tests: **4 passed**.
- Three feature orders: **30/30 passed each**.
- Ruff: PASS.
- Ty root/profile: PASS.
- Basedpyright targeted modules: **0 errors, 0 warnings**.
- `git diff --check`: PASS.

No files or live state were modified.