I read this as read-only QA - I will inspect the exact worktree, run the requested focused checks without modifying files or services, and report every blocker found.


I read this as an updated QA target - I will re-read the changed test bytes, identify the privacy-review cases, and rerun them with mixed import orders against only the current worktree.


I read this as a QA rerun using the candidate-relative profile path, including the privacy and mixed-order coverage - I’ll isolate the newly exposed failures and distinguish new regressions from baseline formatting.


I read this as a QA result for the candidate-relative profile path and mixed-order coverage - I ran the requested coverage and found release blockers.

**FAIL - do not ship.**

- `test_nutrition_coaching.py` now uses the requested repository-relative `PROFILE_PACKAGE` path, but its suite fails: **59 failed, 12 passed**.
- The three privacy tests fail:
  - Candidate-only run: registry fixture serializes `trainer`, rejected as `customers.0.trainer` extra input.
  - With Channel Inbox migration loaded: all three fail with `WizardService.for_registered` rejecting a different `CustomerRuntime` class identity.
- Full mixed-order runs are unstable:
  - Channel Inbox -> nutrition: **41 failed, 64 passed**
  - Nutrition -> Channel Inbox: **58 failed, 47 passed**
  - `test_channel_inbox_migration.py` deletes `checkin_cli` entries from `sys.modules`, leaving gateway imports bound to old model classes.
- Additional current-test contract failures include missing required `owner_confirmed` in schedule-reference fixtures and an `AdaptiveOperatorService` test constructing an object without `profile_root`.
- Formatting fails for modified `tests/gateway/test_nutrition_coaching.py` and `dualcoach/profile/checkin_cli/channel_inbox_migration.py`. Ruff lint passes for the nutrition test; it compiles without bytecode output.
- Existing production quality blockers remain:
  - New `# type: ignore[arg-type]` in `customer_schedule.py:1391`
  - `ty check customer_schedule.py` errors at least at lines 694 and 1148
  - Global Ruff remains unclean (including pre-existing `customer_cleanup_fs.py:151`).

Previously focused standalone Channel Inbox tests still passed, but the requested combined final run does not. No files were edited.


I read this as a final read-only QA rerun against the v1.4 forward-port integration evidence, not the old sandbox - I’ll locate that exact target and validate its declared evidence, digest, and focused gateway coverage.


I read this as a hands-on review of the newly materialized v1.4 forward-port sandbox - I found the fresh v13 simulation and will validate that target only, leaving the old v1.1 and v12 sandboxes out of scope.


I read this as an evidence-only release audit - I will verify the stated digests, final logs, static receipts, and immutability records without accessing live services.


I read this as an evidence-only release audit - I verified the sealed v13 evidence and its captured patch tree.

**BLOCKED**

- The sealed `patch-tree` fails `ruff format --check`: 9 files would be reformatted, including `customer_admin.py`, `customer_coaching.py`, `nutrition_coaching.py`, `telegram.py`, and four gateway/profile tests. This contradicts `final/qualification.txt`'s `ruff=clean`.

All other requested evidence validates: the supplied manifest and sandbox-diff hashes match; `sha256sum -c` passes; mixed order is 35x3; PTB 6; related 169/169; weekly 99/99; lifecycle 10+4; static zero-error receipts are empty; phase hashes are stable; immutable records match; and the sandbox is removed.


I read this as a fresh evidence-based release audit - I will locate v14 and verify its complete sealed gate set under the stated formatter-parity rule.


I read this as a v14 evidence audit - the required v14 artifact is not available.

**BLOCKED**

`/home/cube/projects/richard/.senpi-evidence` has no v14 evidence directory or active v14 sandbox. The requested behavioral, formatter-parity, static, hash-stability, and immutability recheck cannot be performed.


I read this as a final v15 evidence audit - I will locate the sealed v15 bundle and verify every stated claim from its receipts and manifests.


I read this as a final v15 evidence audit - v15 is not available.

**BLOCKED**

No v15 evidence bundle or v15 sandbox exists. The newest available bundle is v14, which is out of scope for the requested final v15 audit.


I read this as a final v16 evidence audit - I will check for the sealed v16 artifact before validating any release claim.


I read this as a final v16 evidence audit - v16 is not available.

**BLOCKED**

No v16 evidence bundle or v16 sandbox exists. The newest bundle is v15, which is out of scope for the requested v16-only audit.


I read this as a sealed v16 evidence audit - I will verify only the specified bundle's digests, receipts, static/format scope, source stability, cleanup, and immutability records.


I read this as a sealed v16 release audit - I verified the final evidence receipts and their consistency.

**BLOCKED**

- The final source has one added-line basedpyright error: `gateway/platforms/telegram.py:12542:19` (`reportAny`). It is inside final added range `12542-12544`. `logs/gates-final-summary.txt` reports `based_added=1` and `ported_aggregate=8973`, contradicting the qualification's `based_added=0` / `ported_aggregate=8972`.

All other requested evidence checks reconcile: supplied digests, 162 manifest entries, source-set stability, formatter/parity receipts, behavior matrices, sandbox removal, and immutable live/service/watcher records.


I read this as a sealed v17 release audit - I will wait only on the artifact's presence, then reconcile every final receipt against its manifests.


I read this as a sealed v17 release audit - v17 is not available.

**BLOCKED**

No v17 evidence bundle or v17 sandbox exists, so the requested duplicate-receipt and full-gate audit cannot be performed.


I read this as a sealed v17 evidence audit - I will verify only this bundle's digests and reconcile all duplicated final gate authorities before issuing a release verdict.


I read this as a sealed v17 evidence audit - all requested receipts reconcile.

**PASS**

All supplied digests and 132 manifest entries validate. Duplicate based-added authorities are zero and the canonical gate summary is byte-identical to qualification. Static, format/parity, behavior/nutrition, source stability, sandbox removal, and live/service/watcher immutability checks all pass.