I read this as a final read-only closure audit - I’ll independently verify the candidate and preseal artifacts, hashes, reproducibility, overlay/invite contents, and complete supersession through r34, then return only an unconditional pass or concrete blockers with a count.


The artifact layout and declared candidate digest are present. I’m now checking the closure rules encoded by the manifests/verifiers and independently recomputing their canonical digests rather than relying on the qualification receipt.


The built-in preseal verifier passes with the expected candidate/package identities. One closure discrepancy needs deeper validation before I can pass it: the customer-invite module is in the Hermes wheel and imported by `dualcoach_admin.py`, but it did not appear in the controller-source listing, so I’m tracing whether the sealed execution intentionally sources it only from the wheel or has an incomplete source closure.


The invite discrepancy is intentional in execution order: sealed wheels precede controller source on `PYTHONPATH`, and an import exercise confirms both `dualcoach_admin` and `dualcoach_customer_invite` resolve from the immutable Hermes wheel. I’m completing the final static boundary/provenance checks, including the r34-to-r35 invite hardening and external hash bindings.


I read this as a final read-only closure decision - I verified all requested r35 boundaries without mutation.

**UNCONDITIONAL PASS**

`blocker_count: 0`

Verified candidate/package digests, exact immutable inventories, reproducible wheel pairs and RECORDs, overlay bindings, sealed invite-module resolution and r35 boundary hardening, and complete non-reusable supersession through r34.