{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"running","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as a hands-on, isolated simulation request - I’ll identify the existing onboarding and daily-check-in test/domain surfaces, run both with realistic and adversarial Korean interactions in a disposable no-network environment, and report transcript-level evidence without editing files or contacting live services."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The usable simulation surfaces are local domain/bridge tests rather than a live transport. I found both flows and will now exercise them against temporary profile/state roots, with socket access disabled at process level and no Telegram adapter send path involved."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I have enough context to run the customer journeys. The simulation will use only `TemporaryDirectory`, fake consent/route evidence, the onboarding domain plus its navigation parser, and the standalone daily wizard/bridge; an audit hook will fail the process on any socket operation."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The first disposable attempt proved an authority precondition before any flow state was written: `customer_enabled=True` is rejected with `ValueError: onboarding target must remain disabled`. Post-consent onboarding therefore requires consent granted while activation is still disabled; I’ll rerun with that canonical state."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The second attempt exposed a second exact setup requirement before state creation: the onboarding store will not create the profile root itself (`onboarding profile root cannot be opened safely`). I’ll pre-create only the disposable profile directory, as production provisioning would, and continue."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"Onboarding completed locally through customer attestation (`owner_review`, baseline persisted). The daily flow then hit only a harness-construction mismatch: `PhysiqueCheckinConfig` has no `enabled` constructor field; enablement is handled by its config loader. I’ll rerun the daily domain/bridge with the exact six-field config contract."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The daily simulation reached 10/12, but my harness looked for “나중에 계속” in the flattened `buttons` field. Navigation is rendered only in `button_rows`; the customer UI itself has the control, but consumers must traverse rows. I’ll rerun using the rendered row structure and finish/save."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as a completed isolated customer QA run - I’ll report both flow outcomes, exact friction, and transcript evidence.\n\n## Outcome\n\nBoth customer-facing flows completed:\n\n- **Post-consent onboarding:** `collecting -> customer_attestation -> owner_review`\n- **nutrition_daily:** finalized as one `nutrition_checkin` event\n- Live profile touched: **no**\n- Telegram messages sent: **0**\n- Network socket events: **0**\n- Repository files edited: **none**\n- All state was under disposable `TemporaryDirectory` roots, deleted afterward.\n\n## Transcript-like run\n\n### 1. Nutrition onboarding\n\n1. Started with consent granted and activation disabled:\n   - `state=collecting`\n   - `next=date_of_birth`\n2. Entered `1994년 2월 18일` -> canonicalized to `1994-02-18`.\n3. Entered malformed closed choice `남자 같아요`.\n   - **Unexpectedly accepted** as raw text.\n   - Cursor advanced from 1 to 2.\n4. Used **Back**.\n   - Cursor returned to `equation_sex_basis`.\n   - Corrected with `남성` -> `male`.\n5. Entered realistic Korean profile:\n   - `172cm`, `68.4kg`\n   - 보통 activity\n   - 주 4회 웨이트 및 걷기\n   - 감량 목표, `64kg`, `2026-12-15`\n   - 갑각류 알레르기, 우유 불내증\n   - 식품 선호·기피, 조리 환경, 예산 등\n6. Used **Defer** at 6/22.\n7. Reconstructed the service and resumed:\n   - Same cursor: 6/22\n   - Next field remained `goal_type`.\n8. Entered malformed meal count `세 번쯤`.\n   - Rejected with parser evidence:\n     `ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '세 번쯤'`\n   - Corrected to `하루 세 끼` -> `3`.\n9. Used **Skip** for optional `schedule_constraints`.\n   - Stored transport default `\"\"`.\n   - Reached `customer_attestation`.\n10. Deterministic validation:\n    - Issues: `[]`\n    - Holds: `[]`\n11. Used **Revise** from attestation.\n    - Returned to `schedule_constraints`.\n    - Entered `평일 점심은 회사 식당, 저녁은 20시 이후 가능`.\n12. Final customer attestation:\n    - `state=owner_review`\n    - Baseline artifact existed in disposable storage.\n\n### 2. nutrition_daily\n\n1. Opened local wizard:\n   - `오늘 체크인 · 약 2~3분`\n   - Progress `1/12`\n2. Entered malformed weight `육십팔점사`.\n   - Rejected; stayed on `bodyweight`.\n   - Notice: `입력을 확인하고 다시 시도해 주세요.`\n3. Corrected to `68.4`.\n4. Entered `2180` kcal.\n5. Entered malformed macros:\n   - `탄수 255 단백질 145 지방 62`\n   - Rejected; stayed on `macros`.\n6. Corrected to `255 145 62`.\n7. Entered realistic meals, `2.3L` water.\n8. Used **Back** from sleep to water.\n   - Corrected water to `2.5L`.\n9. Entered:\n   - Sleep `6.8`, quality `4/5`\n   - Digestion `normal`\n   - Condition `4/5`\n10. Used **Defer** at `appetite_stress`.\n    - Active binding cleared.\n    - Notice: `나중에 여기서 이어갈 수 있도록 임시 저장했습니다.`\n11. Reopened from a new bridge/service instance.\n    - Resumed exactly at progress `10/12`, `appetite_stress`.\n12. Entered:\n    - `식욕 3, 스트레스 2`\n    - `퇴근 후 상체 웨이트 55분, 중간 강도`\n13. Used **Skip** for optional note.\n14. Opened **수정 -> 탄단지**.\n    - Changed macros from `255 145 62` to `250 148 61`.\n15. Final save:\n    - Notice: `체크인을 저장했습니다.`\n    - Confirmation: `✅ 오늘 체크인을 저장했습니다.`\n    - Event count: `1`\n    - Event type: `nutrition_checkin`\n    - Saved facts:\n      - Weight `68.4kg`\n      - Calories `2180kcal`\n      - Carbohydrate `250g`\n      - Protein `148g`\n      - Fat `61g`\n      - Water `2.5L`\n      - Sleep `6.8h`, quality `4/5`\n      - Condition `4/5`\n\n## Exact blockers and friction\n\n1. **Post-consent authority is counterintuitive**\n   - `customer_enabled=True` fails immediately:\n     `ValueError: onboarding target must remain disabled`\n   - Consent must be granted while customer activation remains disabled.\n\n2. **Disposable profile root must already exist**\n   - Missing root fails with:\n     `ValueError: onboarding profile root cannot be opened safely`\n   - The service creates onboarding descendants but not the profile root.\n\n3. **Malformed closed-choice onboarding answers advance immediately**\n   - `남자 같아요` was accepted for `equation_sex_basis`.\n   - Invalid closed choices are not rejected at `submit_answer`; correction may be delayed until reconciliation unless the customer notices and uses Back.\n\n4. **Meal-count rejection is generic at the customer surface**\n   - The parser has a precise Python error, but runtime copy collapses failures to:\n     `입력 형식을 확인해 주세요. 현재 질문에 다시 답해 주세요.`\n\n5. **Navigation is present only in `button_rows`**\n   - `나중에 계속` was not in flattened `prompt.buttons`.\n   - Consumers inspecting only `buttons` will miss Back/Skip/Defer navigation.\n\n6. **Daily invalid-field copy is overly generic**\n   - Invalid macros produced:\n     `현재 항목은(는) 숫자로 보내주세요.`\n   - It does not restate the required three-number order, despite the normal macro prompt doing so.\n\n7. **Onboarding completion is intentionally not activation**\n   - Customer completion stops at `owner_review`.\n   - Owner review/finalization is a separate non-customer action and was not simulated."}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"revived","payload":{"run_epoch":1}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as regression verification against the modified worktree - I’ll rerun both flows in disposable storage with socket operations blocked, exercise each named UX behavior through the current parser/bridge surfaces, and return exact PASS or blocker evidence without editing files."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The modified code now has explicit UX regression coverage and changed customer copy. I’ll verify both the focused test suite and an independent end-to-end disposable transcript, including persisted event values rather than relying only on prompt assertions."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The first independent rerun stopped before simulation because Python’s `asyncio` creates an internal local `socketpair`; the blanket socket audit correctly blocked that too. This is a harness-only blocker, not product behavior. I’ll allow local event-loop plumbing while rejecting DNS and outbound `socket.connect`, which preserves the no-network guarantee."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as completed regression verification - both disposable flows now pass all requested checks with no product blockers.\n\n## Result: PASS\n\nFocused suite:\n\n```text\ntests/gateway/test_customer_nutrition_ux.py\n18 passed in 0.39s\n```\n\n## Evidence\n\n### Post-consent onboarding\n\n- **Malformed closed choice rejected immediately — PASS**\n  - Input: `남자 같아요`\n  - Error: `invalid closed choice`\n  - Cursor remained at `equation_sex_basis`, count stayed `1`.\n  - Recovery: `답을 이해하지 못했어요. 입력한 내용은 저장하지 않았습니다.`\n\n- **Inline Back/Skip/Defer rendered — PASS**\n  - At optional `activity_rationale`, rendered actions were exactly:\n    ```text\n    이전 / 건너뛰기 / 나중에 계속\n    ```\n  - `force_reply=false`, so controls are directly usable.\n  - Back returned from count 5 to count 4.\n  - Skip stored the optional default and advanced to count 6.\n  - Defer/resume reconstructed the service at the same cursor: `6/22`, `goal_type`.\n\n- **Natural Korean shorthand — PASS**\n  - `1990. 3. 2.` -> `1990-03-02`\n  - `남자` -> `male`\n  - `3` activity -> `moderate`\n  - `살 빼기` -> `loss`\n  - `없어요` -> structured none\n  - `2` pregnancy answer -> `False`\n  - `보통 하루 세끼 먹어요` -> `3`\n\n- **Completion — PASS**\n  - Validation issues: `0`\n  - Safety holds: `0`\n  - Final customer state: `owner_review`\n  - Disposable baseline created successfully.\n\n### nutrition_daily\n\n- **Inline navigation rendered — PASS**\n  - First question: `나중에 계속`\n  - Subsequent question: `이전 / 나중에 계속`\n  - Optional-note skip is rendered as the customer-facing `없음` one-tap button.\n\n- **Invalid macros field-specific recovery — PASS**\n  - Input: `대충 먹었어요`\n  - Accepted: `false`\n  - Remained at `macros`\n  - Exact recovery:\n    ```text\n    입력한 내용은 저장하지 않았습니다.\n\n    탄수화물·단백질·지방을 순서대로 입력해 주세요.\n    예: 280 150 65\n    ```\n\n- **Defer/resume — PASS**\n  - Notice: `나중에 여기서 이어갈 수 있도록 임시 저장했습니다.`\n  - New bridge/service resumed at `water`, progress `5/12`.\n\n- **Normal digestion mapping — PASS**\n  - Button: `정상 · 매끈하고 부드러움 (4)`\n  - Stored value: `normal`\n  - Final event: `\"digestion_summary\": \"normal\"`\n\n- **No-workout one-tap — PASS**\n  - Buttons: `운동 안 함 / 운동 내용 입력`\n  - `운동 안 함` advanced directly to `optional_note`.\n  - Summary displayed `운동: -`.\n  - Final event stored `\"training_summary\": \"\"`.\n\n- **Edit/save — PASS**\n  - Edited macros from `255 145 62` to `250 148 61`.\n  - Returned to summary and saved successfully.\n  - Exactly one event persisted:\n    - `carbohydrate_g: 250`\n    - `protein_g: 148`\n    - `fat_g: 61`\n  - Confirmation: `✅ 오늘 체크인을 저장했습니다.`\n\n## Isolation\n\n- Live profile touched: **false**\n- Telegram messages sent: **0**\n- Outbound DNS/connect events: **0**\n- All simulation artifacts stayed under a temporary directory and were removed.\n- Source files edited: **none**\n\nOne harness-only issue occurred initially: blocking every socket prevented `asyncio` from creating its local Unix `socketpair`. The rerun allowed local event-loop plumbing while still rejecting DNS and outbound connections. No product blocker remains."}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"persisted_only"}}
{"type":"suspended","payload":{"reason":"quit"}}
{"type":"reconcile_reattached","payload":{"session_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/children/st_01a0534b/sessions/st_01a0534b/2026-08-30T15-30-14-998Z_01a0534a-ef56-71a0-aa52-4d3e4e4bb7eb.jsonl"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"persisted_only"}}
{"type":"suspended","payload":{"reason":"reload"}}
{"type":"reconcile_reattached","payload":{"session_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/children/st_01a0534b/sessions/st_01a0534b/2026-08-30T15-30-14-998Z_01a0534a-ef56-71a0-aa52-4d3e4e4bb7eb.jsonl"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted"}}
{"type":"evicted","payload":{"cause":"evict"}}