I read this as a read-only release-integrity audit - I’ll independently inventory and hash the candidate wheels and sealed/current source, validate wheel metadata and safety properties, then run the provided verifier and report the first concrete mismatch or a complete proof.


The sealed contract is now identified: it binds 4 wheels, an exact snapshot inventory, immutable permissions, reproducible build pairs, selected wheel-to-source modules, and the current source tree. I’m moving to an independent ZIP/RECORD and thematic successor-module audit rather than relying only on the bundled verifier.


The thematic scope resolves to 14 production modules in the sealed successor overlay (the 15th overlay entry is a test). I found no byte mismatch among those modules; I’m completing RECORD validation for every wheel member and executing the candidate verifier with the interpreter identity sealed into the derivation.


I read this as a read-only release-integrity audit - completed independently and cross-checked with the sealed verifier.

**PASS**

- `blocker_count`: **0**
- `checked_module_count`: **14** successor production modules
- Candidate digest: `73d4a8072d512527ef8340ae2a1254eb709c05a058a3a9b2fe123c44deff1f6f`

Evidence:

- All 14 invite, consent, onboarding, activation, notice, check-in, and cron-diagnostic overlay modules were byte-identical across:
  - build-1 wheel member
  - sealed source inventory
  - candidate source snapshot
  - current source
- All **325** sealed source inventory entries matched both snapshot and current source.
- Build pairs were byte-identical:
  - Hermes: `625f6392198c50c2e78824a83e1d45b9174d4190ab254cb8ffa831e4b120700f`
  - Profile: `e0faafbdc97a90df2bddfae0e62e2024c39c9148765916a0508872f1eb122416`
- Independent ZIP comparison: Hermes **1,042/1,042** and profile **122/122** members identical between builds.
- RECORD validation: **2,328** entries checked across four wheels; zero hash, size, coverage, or self-binding failures.
- Candidate tree: **338 files**, **0 symlinks**, **0 writable entries**, **0 pyc/pyo/cache entries**.
- Wheel contents: zero symlinks or bytecode entries.
- Bundled verifier output:
  - `NUTRICOACH_V150_CANDIDATE_PASS`
  - Returned the expected candidate digest above.
- Audit remained offline and read-only; verifier ran with bytecode generation disabled.


I read this as a focused revalidation of the corrected r54 seal - I’ll run its bundled verifier, compare every sealed source entry with current source, and return only the requested status and counts.


I read this as final r54 validation - reporting status and counts only.

status: PASS
blocker_count: 0
sealed_source_entries: 326
source_mismatches: 0
wheel_source_bindings: 20
wheel_entries: 4
candidate_files: 339
verifier_failures: 0


I read this as a final r56 integrity validation - I’ll run the bundled verifier and independently count sealed-source/current-source and wheel-binding matches, then return status and counts only.


I read this as final r56 integrity validation - reporting status and counts only.

status: PASS
blocker_count: 0
sealed_source_entries: 328
source_mismatches: 0
wheel_bindings: 20
wheel_binding_mismatches: 0
wheel_entries: 4
candidate_files: 341
verifier_failures: 0


I read this as final r57 integrity validation - I’ll run the bundled verifier and independently count source, wheel-binding, and immutable wheel-mode results, then return only status and counts.


I read this as final r57 integrity validation - reporting status and counts only.

status: PASS
blocker_count: 0
sealed_source_entries: 328
source_mismatches: 0
wheel_bindings: 20
wheel_binding_mismatches: 0
immutable_wheel_files: 4
immutable_wheel_mode_mismatches: 0
candidate_files: 341
verifier_failures: 0


I read this as final r59 integrity validation - I’ll run the verifier and independently count source, 22 wheel-binding, and four immutable wheel hash/mode checks, then return only status and counts.


I read this as final r59 integrity validation - reporting status and counts only.

status: PASS
blocker_count: 0
sealed_source_entries: 328
source_mismatches: 0
wheel_bindings: 22
wheel_binding_mismatches: 0
required_bindings_present: 2
required_bindings_missing: 0
immutable_wheel_files: 4
immutable_wheel_mode_mismatches: 0
wheel_hash_mismatches: 0
candidate_files: 341
verifier_failures: 0


I read this as final r60 integrity validation - I’ll independently count all source, 24 wheel-binding, four wheel hash/mode checks, run the candidate verifier, and return only status and counts.


I read this as final r60 integrity validation - reporting status and counts only.

status: PASS
blocker_count: 0
sealed_source_entries: 329
source_mismatches: 0
wheel_bindings: 24
wheel_binding_mismatches: 0
required_bindings_present: 2
required_bindings_missing: 0
immutable_wheel_files: 4
immutable_wheel_mode_mismatches: 0
wheel_hash_mismatches: 0
candidate_files: 342
verifier_failures: 0


I read this as final r61 integrity validation - I’ll verify all 329 source entries, 24 wheel bindings, wheel hashes/modes, and the bundled verifier, then return only status counts.


I read this as final r61 integrity validation - reporting status counts only.

status: PASS
blocker_count: 0
sealed_source_entries: 329
source_mismatches: 0
wheel_bindings: 24
wheel_binding_mismatches: 0
immutable_wheel_files: 4
immutable_wheel_mode_mismatches: 0
wheel_hash_mismatches: 0
candidate_files: 342
verifier_failures: 0


I read this as final r62 integrity validation - I’ll verify all 329 source entries, 24 wheel bindings, wheel hashes/modes, and the bundled verifier, then return only status counts.


I read this as final r62 integrity validation - reporting status counts only.

status: PASS
blocker_count: 0
sealed_source_entries: 329
source_mismatches: 0
wheel_bindings: 24
wheel_binding_mismatches: 0
immutable_wheel_files: 4
immutable_wheel_mode_mismatches: 0
wheel_hash_mismatches: 0
candidate_files: 342
verifier_failures: 0