I read this as a read-only release integrity audit - I’ll inspect the sealed candidate and source, independently validate provenance, verifier behavior, wheel reproducibility/RECORDs, and every configured wheel-source binding, then return a strict PASS/FAIL with blocker counts.


The seal structure is now clear: the candidate embeds a complete hash inventory, immutable v17 inputs, two detached wheel pairs, and a source-aware verifier. I’m moving to independent byte-level validation, including ZIP/RECORD semantics rather than relying only on the candidate verifier’s PASS result.


I read this as a read-only release integrity audit - I validated the candidate independently against its source and seal.

**PASS blocker_count=0**

- Sealed inventory: **341/341** entries valid
- Source bindings: **330/330** match source
- Candidate verifier: **PASS**
- Reproducible wheels: **2/2 pairs** byte-identical
- Wheel RECORD integrity: **4/4 wheels PASS**
- Configured wheel-source bindings: **25/25**, **50/50** across both builds
- `dualcoach_customer_invite`: **PASS**
- profile `customer_admin`: **PASS**
- Physical inventory, permissions, qualification, and candidate derivation: **PASS**
- Candidate digest: `3d78f8fcc91644078ef8f67435684d5ecad051eb3af12716b6845775e1cf1d22`
- No writes or network access performed.