{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"running","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as a read-only architecture and safety audit - I’ll trace the onboarding model, state transitions, calculations, persistence/replay, compatibility paths, and tests, then report concrete risks and proposed failing tests."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I’ve located the live implementation under `dualcoach/profile`; the key issue is not the visible question count itself, but preserving the canonical baseline schema and resumable state-machine semantics behind any shorter presentation. I’m now tracing those exact contracts and compatibility seams."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The trace now shows two concrete “stuck” classes already present: meal-count contracts disagree (`2..6` onboarding/profile versus `1..8` adaptive), and the advertised privacy choice to decline the equation basis can never produce a plan. I’m consolidating those with session-versioning, revision, replay, and data-retention findings into a test-first migration recommendation."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as a read-only safety/data-model audit - I traced the canonical schema, runtime flow, persistence, replay, revisions, calculations, and compatibility boundaries.\n\n## Verdict\n\nThe 22 customer prompts can be reduced or merged, but **not by shrinking or reordering `QUESTION_FIELDS` in place**. That tuple is simultaneously:\n\n- Canonical answer order\n- Persisted cursor interpretation\n- Reconciliation issue order\n- Revision addressing\n- Progress/replay semantics\n\nA shorter UX needs a versioned presentation layer that expands each screen atomically into the unchanged canonical baseline fields.\n\n## Critical findings\n\n1. **Meal-count contracts already conflict**\n   - Onboarding and `CustomerProfile`: `2..6`  \n     `nutrition_onboarding_models.py:190`, `customer_coaching.py:904`\n   - Adaptive registration: `1..8`  \n     `customer_coaching.py:821`, `customer_admin.py:3721`\n   - The parser accepts 1, 7, and 8, but reconciliation rejects them. Customers repeatedly receive clarification with no valid representation of their actual schedule.\n   - All three contracts must converge, preferably on `1..8`.\n\n2. **The privacy “decline” choice cannot complete onboarding**\n   - `EquationSexBasis.DECLINE` is advertised and accepted.\n   - Calculation then raises `CalculationDeclinedError`: `nutrition_onboarding_calculations.py:175`.\n   - Owner preflight catches it only as generic `ValueError`; the owner remains at review without an actionable revision button. Publication renders Approve/Reject/Safety Hold, not `op_rev`: `telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime_publication.py:371-378`.\n   - Either provide an approved non-sex-based calculation path or do not present decline as a completable choice.\n\n3. **Raw DOB and sensitive answers survive successful completion**\n   - Canonical `NutritionOnboardingBaseline` correctly discards DOB.\n   - However, `baseline-candidate.json` stores complete `source_answers`, including DOB and medical answers: `nutrition_onboarding.py:241-260`.\n   - Finalization deletes only `workflow.json`, not `baseline-candidate.json`: `nutrition_onboarding_finalize_service.py:58`.\n   - Persist only derived `adult_age`, reference date, canonical digest, and safety disposition after attestation/finalization. Remove plaintext source answers when no longer needed.\n\n4. **Optional cooking/budget skips conflict with downstream activation**\n   - Runtime permits empty defaults for cooking and budget.\n   - Adaptive registration later requires both to be non-empty and exactly match the onboarding profile: `customer_admin.py:3728-3730`, `3816+`.\n   - A customer can finish onboarding yet become impossible to register adaptively. Either these fields are genuinely optional downstream, or onboarding must collect an explicit usable value.\n\n5. **Changing the field tuple strands legacy sessions**\n   - Persisted sessions contain only a positional cursor; no questionnaire version.\n   - `submit_answer`, status, rewind, and revision index directly into current `QUESTION_FIELDS`: `nutrition_onboarding.py:204-212`, `316`.\n   - Treat missing `questionnaire_version` as `legacy_22_v1`; never reinterpret its cursor using a new screen list.\n\n6. **Revision semantics are tied to the old 22-step sequence**\n   - `_reopen_revision` truncates every answer at and after the canonical field.\n   - In a merged UX, revision must map canonical field -> owning screen, reopen that screen, and retain unaffected canonical answers.\n   - Revising safety fields must invalidate clinical clearance and owner-risk acceptance, as current baseline revision already invalidates clinical review.\n\n7. **Reference dates are inconsistent**\n   - Reconciliation persists a stable reference date.\n   - Attestation independently derives age with `date.today()`: `nutrition_onboarding.py:251`.\n   - A restart or birthday boundary can produce a baseline evaluated against a different date than reconciliation. Capture one KST reference date at session creation and reuse it throughout.\n\n8. **Active-customer migration is too narrow for generalized compatibility**\n   - The legacy migration supports exactly one expected enabled customer: `nutrition_onboarding_migration.py:41`.\n   - Existing enabled customers should not be reprojected or re-onboarded. Their registry profile, plan, readiness pointers, and adaptive registrations must remain byte/digest compatible.\n   - Projection correctly remains disabled-customer-only: `nutrition_onboarding_projection.py:42`.\n\n## Recommended model\n\nKeep two independent contracts:\n\n- `CANONICAL_BASELINE_FIELDS_V1`: the existing 22-field data contract and digest order.\n- `QUESTIONNAIRE_V2_SCREENS`: fewer UX screens, each producing one or more canonical fields.\n\nPersist:\n\n- `questionnaire_version`\n- `screen_id` or screen cursor\n- Canonical answer map\n- Stable `reference_date`\n- Consumed update IDs\n- Canonical answer digest\n\nFor legacy sessions, continue the old 22-step renderer until completion. New grouped submissions must validate all fields first, then atomically save all expanded values and consume the Telegram update once.\n\n## Proposed failing tests\n\n1. `test_compact_onboarding_matrix_reaches_ready`\n   - Parameterize maintain/loss/gain.\n   - Assert complete canonical baseline, resolved reconciliation, safe 12-week calculations, final readiness, and registry projection.\n\n2. `test_maintain_screen_materializes_null_targets`\n   - Maintain skips target inputs but emits both target fields as `None`.\n   - Reconciliation must not report missing values.\n\n3. `test_loss_gain_preserve_requested_goal_and_safe_recommendation`\n   - Verify target weight/date survive merging.\n   - Aggressive trajectories preserve the request and produce a safe recommended date.\n\n4. `test_preflight_failure_always_exposes_bound_revision_path`\n   - Cover declined equation basis, past target date, wrong target direction, and calorie-bound failure.\n   - Assert state never becomes terminal/finalizing and customer/owner can revise the exact responsible screen.\n\n5. `test_meal_count_supported_end_to_end`\n   - Parameterize `1, 3, 7, 8`.\n   - Assert onboarding, baseline, registry profile, meal structures, adaptive registration, restart, and readiness all accept the same value.\n\n6. `test_age_privacy_after_attestation_and_ready`\n   - Submit a unique DOB.\n   - After attestation and after finalization, recursively inspect durable onboarding artifacts.\n   - Assert plaintext DOB is absent while derived age and stable reference date remain.\n   - Repeat after cancellation and failed/revised onboarding.\n\n7. `test_reference_date_is_stable_across_birthday_restart`\n   - Start before a birthday, restart/attest after the clock advances.\n   - Assert reconciliation and baseline use the session’s original reference date.\n\n8. `test_each_optional_skip_can_finish_and_activate`\n   - Parameterize every skip-enabled field.\n   - Assert canonical value exists, reconciliation resolves, onboarding reaches ready, and downstream adaptive registration remains constructible.\n   - This should currently fail for cooking and budget.\n\n9. `test_sensitive_group_never_defaults_to_safe`\n   - Parameterize conditions, medications, pregnancy, and eating-disorder risk with provided/true/unknown.\n   - Assert merged partial answers cannot silently become false/none and each required case enters safety hold.\n\n10. `test_safety_hold_survives_restart_replay_and_revision`\n    - Restart and duplicate-update replay while held.\n    - Assert no duplicate receipt and no transition to owner review without bound clinical clearance or owner-risk acceptance.\n    - Revising a safety field invalidates old clearance/acceptance.\n\n11. `test_legacy_22_session_resumes_at_every_cursor`\n    - Fixtures for cursors `0..22` with no questionnaire version.\n    - Assert exact legacy next field, no answer loss, and completion under the new release.\n\n12. `test_legacy_noncollecting_states_resume`\n    - Cover customer attestation, reconciliation clarification, safety hold, owner review, finalizing, and ready.\n    - Assert restart and duplicate callback replay always yield an actionable or terminal state.\n\n13. `test_group_submission_is_atomic_and_idempotent`\n    - Crash before write, after write, and during publication.\n    - Assert either no grouped fields commit or all commit; replay consumes one update and never advances twice.\n\n14. `test_revision_maps_canonical_field_to_compact_screen`\n    - Revise each field within a merged screen.\n    - Assert unaffected canonical answers remain, reconciliation digest changes, stale callbacks fail, and the customer can complete again.\n\n15. `test_existing_enabled_customers_are_unchanged`\n    - Seed active legacy customers with meal counts including 1 and 7+, readiness pointers, plans, and registrations.\n    - Start/finalize a different disabled customer.\n    - Assert existing customer documents and digests remain unchanged.\n\nNo files were modified."}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted"}}
{"type":"evicted","payload":{"cause":"evict"}}