message: 403: {"code":"ENTITLEMENT_ERROR","message":"Error 403: the user is not subscribed to required model plan"}

stop_reason: error


error_message: 403: {"code":"ENTITLEMENT_ERROR","message":"Error 403: the user is not subscribed to required model plan"}


<results>
<files>
- /home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v150-combined/dualcoach/profile/checkin_cli/nutrition_onboarding.py - core onboarding state machine; `submit_answer`, `rewind_collection`, `record_reconciliation`, `replace_stale_reconciliation`, `revise_reconciliation_answer`, `attest_baseline`
- /home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v150-combined/dualcoach/profile/checkin_cli/nutrition_onboarding_copy.py - field-type parsing and error copy; `parse_answer`, `answer_error`, `card`
- /home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v150-combined/dualcoach/profile/checkin_cli/nutrition_onboarding_clarification_policy.py - canonical "unknown/ambiguous" classification; `canonicalize_answer`, `_valid_structured`, `_type_reasons`, `compile_clarification_policy`
- /home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v150-combined/dualcoach/profile/checkin_cli/nutrition_onboarding_reconciliation.py - persisted clarification/correction record; `build_reconciliation`, `recompute_reconciliation`, `require_resolved_reconciliation`
- /home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v150-combined/dualcoach/profile/checkin_cli/nutrition_onboarding_session.py - durable session load/save surface; `build_status`, `load_mutable_session`, `save_session`
- /home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v150-combined/gateway/platforms/telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime_collection.py - live invalid-answer handling; `_handle_text_locked`
- /home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v150-combined/gateway/platforms/telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime_publication.py - operator/customer publication routing; `_publish`, `_operator_attention_payload`, `recover_operator_status`
- /home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v150-combined/gateway/platforms/telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime_callback.py - correction/handoff callbacks; `_handle_callback_locked`
- /home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v150-combined/gateway/platforms/telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime_publication_transport.py - durable send/uncertain recovery; `_send_publication`, `_mark_unknown`, `publication_generation`
- /home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v150-combined/gateway/platforms/telegram_nutrition_onboarding_operator_ack.py - persistent operator acknowledgement store; `GatewayOperatorAttentionStore.acknowledge`
- /home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v150-combined/gateway/platforms/telegram_nutrition_onboarding_operator_recovery.py - gated operator-recovery capability loader; `load_operator_notification_recovery`
- /home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v150-combined/dualcoach/profile/tests/test_nutrition_onboarding_clarification_policy.py - best existing seams for ambiguous/invalid/correctable answers
- /home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v150-combined/dualcoach/profile/tests/test_nutrition_onboarding.py - end-to-end onboarding/revision/safety-hold seams
- /home/cube/projects/richard/.worktrees/nutricoach-v150-combined/dualcoach/profile/tests/test_nutrition_onboarding_store.py - analogous durable uncertainty semantics (`UNCERTAIN`) for transport, not answer validation
</files>

<answer>
What exists today:
- Formal field-type "I don't know"/unknown handling already exists in parsing:
  - structured fields map to `{"status":"none","items":[]}` via `parse_answer`
  - booleans support `확실하지 않음` -> `None`
  - `target_weight_kg` / `target_date` accept none-like inputs
  - `equation_sex_basis` has a decline path, but `submit_answer` rejects decline in `customer_v2`
- Customer correction already exists, but only after reconciliation/attestation:
  - `revise_reconciliation_answer` reopens one field and recomputes the reconciliation digest
  - `rewind_collection` reopens earlier questions and drops later answers
- Operator handoff without activation already exists as a publication/state pattern:
  - `owner_review` and `safety_hold` are non-ready states
  - publication carries `operator_attention_identity` / `operator_delivery_epoch`
  - `GatewayOperatorAttentionStore` persists acknowledgements
  - `recover_operator_status` can republish owner-facing cards durably

What is missing:
- No persistent invalid-answer attempt counter exists in the onboarding domain/session model.
- No automatic "after two failures, hand off to operator" transition exists.
- The text path currently just replies with `answer_error(...)` and returns; it does not persist failure counts.

Smallest architecture-consistent design:
1. Add a per-session/per-field attempt counter in the onboarding session JSON and expose it on `OnboardingStatus`.
2. Increment it in the same locked path that currently rejects invalid text (`_handle_text_locked` / `submit_answer`).
3. On first failure: keep current behavior, no state change.
4. On second failure: transition into an existing non-activation operator-facing state (`owner_review` is the cleanest fit; `safety_hold` is reserved for clinical risk).
5. Reuse the existing publication pipeline so the operator card is durably receipted and recoverable.
6. Let later customer correction reuse the existing correction seam:
   - if still in clarification flow, `revise_reconciliation_answer`
   - if the operator rewinds the questionnaire, `rewind_collection`

Safety risks:
- Do not overload `safety_hold` for ordinary invalid input; it is already reserved for clinical clearance and owner-risk flows.
- Keep counters durable and monotonic; replay/duplicate updates must not double-count.
- Preserve digest binding; otherwise stale corrections will silently mutate the wrong answer.
- Keep operator handoff publication gated by current authority/receipt, or recovery will desync.

Observable test seams:
- Unit-level parser seams: `parse_answer`, `answer_error`, `compile_clarification_policy`
- State-machine seam: `NutritionOnboardingService.submit_answer`
- Correction seam: `revise_reconciliation_answer`, `rewind_collection`
- Gateway seam: `_handle_text_locked`, `_publish`, `_handle_callback_locked`
- Durability seam: `load_mutable_session` / `save_session`, plus `GatewayOperatorAttentionStore`
- Existing tests to extend:
  - `test_mixed_ambiguity_and_invalid_value_compile_complete_ordered_issue_set`
  - `test_noncanonical_equation_basis_keeps_clarification_and_requires_enum_resolution`
  - `test_reconciliation_revision_is_digest_bound_and_customer_authorized`
  - `test_customer_v2_group_submission_is_atomic_restartable_and_rewindable`
  - `test_safety_hold_requires_scoped_owner_clinical_clearance`

Decision-complete read:
- Existing code already covers field-type unknown answers and later correction.
- It does not yet persist invalid-attempt counts or auto-handoff after two failures.
- The cleanest integration point is the existing collection handler plus the owner-review/safety-hold publication path, not a new parallel workflow.
</answer>

<next_steps>
Implement the counter in the session document and wire the second-failure transition through the existing gateway publication path; add regression tests at the parser, service, and runtime seams above.
</next_steps>
</results>