I read this as closure verification - I will independently validate the frozen Todo 3 blockers, capture the required local visual evidence, and write the adversarial verification JSON without changing product code or tests.


I read this as completion of the existing verification - I will preserve the completed test/manual evidence, finish the local browser-rendered visual capture, clean temporary QA assets, and write the required verdict JSON.


I read this as closure verification - I completed the evidence-only audit and recorded a reproducible needs-fix verdict.

```json
{
  "schema": "AdversarialVerify/v1",
  "task_id": "st_01a058cc",
  "todo": 3,
  "verdict": "needs-fix",
  "confidence": "high",
  "evidence_path": ".omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-3-adversarial-verify-r2.json",
  "blockers": [
    "Known and previous transitions both use receipt_variant=selected and lack a visible value-free confirmation header.",
    "tests/gateway/test_nutrition_coaching.py: 34 passed, 41 failed because the initial empty launcher message_id is rejected by BindingStore.",
    "Browser PNG visual capture is unavailable; fresh Korean transcript/tui-check passes at 73/80 columns with no overflow."
  ],
  "confirmed": [
    "Both changed-file hashes match the updated implementation receipt.",
    "Actual u callback advances the real WizardService and records unknown.",
    "All-unknown summary renders 확인 12/12.",
    "nutrition_daily rejects current l while morning preserves defer.",
    "이전 답 수정 label, action rows, and value-free cards are correct."
  ]
}
```

No product/test edits or commits. Temporary QA assets were removed.