I read this as an independent adversarial verification of Todo 4 - I’ll inspect the plan, evidence, implementation, tests, and contracts; run the full required verification and fault probes; then write only the requested evidence JSON without modifying product or tests.


I’ve located the fixed implementation workspace and the Todo 4 evidence. I’m now validating the implementation against the actual Wave 1 contracts and deriving independent probes rather than trusting the implementer’s test summary.


The behavioral suites are green, but the required strict static gate has exposed a reproducible issue: `ty check` reports six errors in the new dedicated test file. I’m completing the mandated isolated manual surface and tool-availability check so the rejection evidence distinguishes a test-typing blocker from runtime behavior.


I read this as completed adversarial verification - the evidence JSON is written and validated.

{"verdict":"REJECT","confidence":0.99,"blocker_count":2,"evidence_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-4-adversarial-verify.json","evidence_sha256":"dc6660d21c5aa8b26be6612a21f90a8a1c4c577c2941d461f71e991efd8b9122","repro":[".venv/bin/ty check gateway/platforms/telegram_physique_checkin_stepper.py tests/gateway/test_telegram_physique_checkin_stepper.py -> 6 diagnostics","/home/cube/.local/bin/basedpyright gateway/platforms/telegram_physique_checkin_stepper.py tests/gateway/test_telegram_physique_checkin_stepper.py -> 57 errors"],"behavioral_verification":"303 tests passed; isolated manual QA PASS with happy_sends=1, automatic_recovery_sends=0, customer_data_persisted=false; temporary driver deleted"}


I read this as a delta-only closure review of the two strict typing blockers - I’ll verify the frozen production hash, updated test binding, strict module-plus-test checks, focused regression counts, and absence of typing/assertion shortcuts, then replace the evidence JSON with the delta verdict.


The typing delta is clean and the test-only changes replace dynamic/private shortcuts with typed fakes and public bridge/store surfaces without reducing assertions. I’m running the exact single 303-test combined invocation before sealing the replacement evidence.


I read this as a completed delta-only verification - both strict typing blockers are closed with no regressions.

{"verdict":"confirmed","confidence":0.99,"blocker_count":0,"evidence_path":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-4-adversarial-verify.json","evidence_sha256":"df4c1625d8c8cfc992acc02462367c15c44570cd0a036ebb2f4df988aebe6eb2","ty":"PASS","basedpyright":"PASS: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 notes","dedicated":"23 passed","combined":"303 passed","production_hash_unchanged":true,"manual_evidence_valid":true}