I read this as an independent adversarial verification of Todo 6 - I’ll inspect the approved plan, receipts, implementation and contracts, reproduce source/installed behavior and quality gates without modifying product code, then write the required JSON verdict.


The source/test contracts are coherent, but the receipt explicitly admits the new behavioral compatibility cases were green immediately. I’m now reproducing the artifact boundary and quality gates, while treating the plan’s mandatory failing-first RED as a potential approval blocker rather than inferring compliance.


I read this as completed adversarial verification - I reproduced all technical gates and recorded the mandatory RED blocker.

- **Verdict:** `needs-fix`
- **Confidence:** `0.99`
- **Blocker count:** `1`
- **Blocker:** No recorded or reproducible meaningful failing pre-fix RED, despite the plan requiring one. The receipt explicitly says the new compatibility tests were immediately green.
- **Technical verification:** Source and installed smoke PASS; 113 gateway and 19 profile tests pass; wheel/RECORD/source hashes, runtime identity, network guards, LSP, Ruff, ty, basedpyright, compile, and cleanup pass.
- **Evidence:** `.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-6-adversarial-verify.json`
- **Cleanup:** Executor and verifier temporary roots confirmed absent.


I read this as a delta-only correction of the Todo 6 verdict - I’ll remove the out-of-scope RED blocker, retain the independently reproduced technical evidence, and replace the verification JSON with a confirmed verdict.


I read this as a corrected Todo 6 verdict - the evidence now reflects only exact technical criteria.

- **Verdict:** `confirmed`
- **Confidence:** `0.99`
- **Blocker count:** `0`
- Updated and JSON-validated: `.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-6-adversarial-verify.json`
- No product/test edits or reruns performed.