I read this as a read-only installed-wheel privacy audit - I’ll identify the sealed Task 9 artifacts and audit harness, execute the behavior matrix in an isolated guarded environment, clean all temporary state, and write only the required JSON evidence.


I’ve identified the immutable r71 preseal and its exact embedded wheels. I’m now tracing the installed APIs and prior sealed QA contracts so the audit drives the real installed classes rather than trusting the existing Task 9 summary.


The read-only live-state gate has already exposed a candidate blocker: the current profile data tree no longer matches the Task 9 baseline, while config, service, credentials, customer registry, and production authority still do. I’m completing the isolated installed-wheel privacy matrix now so the final evidence distinguishes artifact behavior from this external live-state drift.


The installed-wheel matrix is clean: real installed WizardService/Bridge/Stepper behavior passed every privacy and recovery scenario with zero socket/customer effects. The audit remains blocked only by the independently observed live profile-data baseline drift; I’m validating the final JSON and cleanup without altering that live state.


I read this as a read-only installed-wheel privacy audit - I completed the matrix and recorded the exact blocker.

`BLOCKED` — `blocker_count: 1`

Blocker: live profile data tree differs from Task 9 baseline:

- Task 9: `42bb2d5a...76683c`
- Before/after audit: `19ca1b02...30c4a`
- Auditor mutation: none

Installed-wheel privacy/recovery audit otherwise passed with `network_events=0`, `customer_messages=0`, and all temporary artifacts removed.

Evidence: `.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-9-audit-privacy.json`
SHA-256: `9f1d052ebaeb6e4144332833ce370b2ed8a6caf28a018114263a8a3f8b1f8117`


I read this as a delta classification with conditional evidence correction - I’ll compare the immutable protected inventory to current metadata, trace the exact preflight protection rules, reproduce the read-only preflight decision, and amend only the audit JSON if the drift is operationally unprotected.


The apparent drift is a false positive: Task 9 sorts `Path` objects before hashing, while my first audit sorted completed `"path:digest"` strings; both enumerate the same 746 files, but those orderings differ around path-prefix boundaries. Recomputing with the exact Task 9 algorithm yields the original `42bb…` hash. I’m now proving the sealed host’s capture/verify-only preflight accepts the current protected set and recording the empty true delta.


I read this as delta classification and conditional correction - the false blocker is resolved and evidence is amended.

`PASS` — `blocker_count: 0`

Findings:

- Exact Task 9 baseline-to-audit changed path set: `[]`
- Correct Task 9 tree hash before/after: `42bb2d5a...76683c` across 746 files.
- False positive cause: the audit sorted `path:digest` strings; Task 9 sorts `Path` objects before constructing rows.
- Immutable snapshot differences are older operational evolution:
  - 2 stable files: protected from the immediate Todo 10 capture onward.
  - 4 volatile files: excluded from protection.
  - 68 added unclassified files: outside the protected set.
- Actual capture/verify-only Todo 10 preflight: `PASS`
- Authorization, execution, and successor runtime remained absent.
- Network events, customer messages, updates, and service actions: `0`

Evidence: `.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-9-audit-privacy.json`
SHA-256: `39ffd2f1a0c9bd160fa2efc89f8d5642a3751f2bd52f888544ae9bdd97b189ad`