I read this as a read-only adversarial release verification - I’ll reconstruct the corrected receipt, inspect and exercise the controller/preparer implementation and required suites, then write only the specified evidence JSON.


The corrected receipt identifies the exact 22-file increment and required commands. I’m now validating that receipt against disk, tracing the concrete phase/order and derivation code, and checking the worktree for adjacent unreceipted source/test changes without using Git.


Source tracing found release-blocking integration gaps despite the green receipt: the actual preseal preparer never calls the new maintenance derivation, and the real controller constructs the “known r70” proof from constants rather than observed job/runtime/evidence. I’m completing the mandated test/static runs and targeted executable repros so the evidence distinguishes passing suites from uncovered behavior.


Verification is complete: the mandated 120/240 and 81-test observer/controller suites pass, and real inotify close-write/atomic-replace/timeout probes pass. The verdict remains needs-fix because those suites do not exercise the disconnected packaging path, spoofable r70 proof, maintenance-aware recovery, or strict type gates. I’m recording the exact blockers and cleanup state now.


I read this as adversarial verification delivery - completed and recorded the findings.

Verdict: **needs-fix**
Confidence: **0.99**
Blockers: **5**
Disposable packaging ready: **no**

Evidence:

`/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-10-r71b-controller-source-adversarial.json`

SHA-256: `4916891787890fa35b303972e69dbbfa67d8d711f03949a2c6017020b2ec0663`

Key verification:
- All 13 source and 9 test hashes matched.
- Corrected suite: 120 passed.
- Affected runtime suite: 240 passed.
- Controller/safety/adversarial/closure/observer: 81 passed.
- Five release blockers documented, including disconnected preparer integration, non-independent replay, spoofable r70 proof, missing maintenance recovery lifecycle, and failed strict diagnostics.


I read this as a delta-only closure review of the five recorded blockers - I’ll compare the amended receipt and current implementations to the prior evidence, exercise each formerly failing behavior through executable surfaces, rerun the specified suites and strict gates, then update only the adversarial evidence JSON.


The amended receipt hashes a focused 10-source/5-test delta, and all five former blocker areas now have landed code. I’m validating whether the new code is genuinely authoritative and integrated rather than only test-shaped, then I’ll run the closure matrices and strict analyzers on the exact current delta.


A source-level regression remains in the recovery path: persisted `MAINTENANCE_CONFIRMED` reconstruction re-runs `_read_r70_proof`, but that function still requires the predecessor’s old `last_error`; after successful maintenance the durable cron state is `last_error=null`, so real confirmed recovery cannot reach roll-forward. I’m continuing all requested executions to determine whether any additional closure claims fail.


The delta closes independent reconstruction and the spoof matrix, but three release blockers remain: the authoritative candidate evidence files have no production writer, the integrated maintenance lifecycle cannot survive its own post-fence or confirmed recovery, and strict diagnostics still fail on amended tests. I’m finalizing the updated needs-fix evidence with the concrete primitive repros and exact current hashes.


I read this as delta-only blocker closure verification - completed and updated the evidence.

Verdict: **needs-fix**
Confidence: **0.99**
Remaining blockers: **3**
Disposable packaging ready: **no**

Key results:
- Focused: 76 passed
- Maintenance: 240 passed
- Controller/safety/adversarial/closure/observer: 81 passed
- Independent reconstruction and spoof matrix: closed
- Actual `execute_disposable`: failed `systemd_post_fence`
- Confirmed recovery: failed `r70_cron`
- Basedpyright amended sources/tests: 40 errors

Evidence:

`/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-10-r71b-controller-source-adversarial.json`

SHA-256: `a6efde1eb27c41692c151bbd88d88d94516c198ba8e83a32e409fff457603769`


I read this as the final delta closure review of the three remaining blockers - I’ll verify the new evidence-ingestion chain, exercise the real disposable commit/rollback/recovery surfaces, run the exact static and test gates, then update only the adversarial evidence with a confirmed verdict if every check passes.


The v3 receipt identifies an exact 8-source/7-test delta and adds real disposable lifecycle tests. I’m now checking the candidate evidence binding and transaction semantics directly, including whether the “retained credential” is genuinely the successor postimage and whether recovery avoids reapplying predecessor-only proof requirements.


The lifecycle fix is structurally present, but the evidence-ingestion blocker is not closed: the sealer binds whatever caller-controlled bytes are supplied for observer and fixed-collector evidence, with no exact Task10 digest, schema, freshness, or semantic validation. Its own regression seals arbitrary `{\"source\": ...}` fixtures and only proves tampering changes candidate identity, not that malformed/stale/tampered evidence is rejected. I’m completing the requested runtime and strict gates before recording the final verdict.


All requested automated gates are green, including strict diagnostics on all 15 amended files. Two behavioral blockers nevertheless remain outside those assertions: malformed/stale observer and collector evidence is sealable, and real persisted confirmed recovery still reaches `post_fence` with an empty `_postimages` map because the recovery branch neither loads nor reconstructs it; the landed recovery test replaces `host.post_fence` with a no-op. I’m capturing direct repros and final cleanup/hash state now.


The final delta still cannot be confirmed. A real pre-confirmation `start` fault leaves the predecessor stopped with journal `RECOVERY_REQUIRED` despite the cron being safely paused and bytes restored; and the confirmed-recovery test suppresses the real post-fence that would fail on an unreconstructed postimage map. I’m updating the evidence with these two remaining blockers and the otherwise clean 114/240/81 and strict results.


I read this as final delta closure verification - completed and updated the evidence.

Verdict: **needs-fix**
Confidence: **0.99**
Remaining blockers: **2**
Disposable packaging ready: **no**

Results:
- Focused: 114 passed
- Maintenance: 240 passed
- Controller/safety/adversarial/closure/observer: 81 passed
- Ruff, ty, basedpyright, LSP: clean
- Malformed/stale observer and collector evidence remains sealable
- Actual pre-confirm rollback ends inactive/`RECOVERY_REQUIRED`
- Persisted confirmed recovery still lacks real postimage reconstruction

Evidence:

`/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-10-r71b-controller-source-adversarial.json`

SHA-256: `509daa38e0f846506f20959113c3a23ede3be93797a23e0ab8dcb194009c0481`


I read this as a final two-blocker delta verification - I’ll hash-match the current receipt, adversarially exercise exact Task10 evidence admission and the real rollback/recovery surfaces, rerun strict plus 120/240/81, then update only the adversarial evidence based on observed results.


The current source now has fixed-path, fixed-hash, schema/status/semantic validation and canonical provenance envelopes for all three Task10 reports; the real disposable tests also cover successful commit, unmocked fresh-host post-fence recovery, and terminal safe rollback. I’m running the exact 120/240/81 and strict current receipt set, then I’ll independently probe the disposable substitution matrix without touching authoritative evidence.


Both prior blockers now close under direct reproduction: exact Task10 sources pass while wrong-parent, malformed/stale substitutions, symlink, hardlink, mode, owner/group, and canonically recomputed copy substitution all reject; the three real disposable lifecycle scenarios pass, and terminal rollback is a no-op on subsequent recovery. I’m performing final hash/root cleanup checks and will record a confirmed verdict.


I read this as final two-blocker verification - both are closed.

Verdict: **confirmed**
Confidence: **0.99**
Blockers: **0**
Disposable packaging ready: **yes**

Verification:
- Focused: 120 passed
- Maintenance: 240 passed
- Controller/safety/adversarial/closure/observer: 81 passed
- Ruff, ty, basedpyright, LSP: clean
- Exact Task10 substitution matrix: passed
- Commit, terminal rollback, replay no-op, and fresh-host confirmed recovery: passed
- No package/live roots or effects

Evidence:

`/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-10-r71b-controller-source-adversarial.json`

SHA-256: `b6f8ad72fc389fde50cf448ea2d0b9c5de2cabb3b44cb45c5378d7a59697e1c1`