I read this as a disposable-only r71b packaging qualification - I’ll inspect the existing qualification machinery and immutable baselines, then execute the full test-first build, seal, installed-runtime, and cleanup protocol without creating authoritative roots.


I’ve located the confirmed source-only runtime and controller receipts. I’m moving into the exact worktree now to rehash those sources, prove all r71b authoritative destinations absent, and identify the existing disposable package/rehearsal entry points before running anything.


The controller source rehash is clean; three runtime files and supporting tests have newer confirmed package-derivation changes than the earlier runtime receipt, matching the later source-freeze hashes. I’m running the focused package/controller suites now; any source defect will be handled red-first before disposable artifacts are built.


The focused suite exposed one real package-closure defect: `nutrition_weekly_dispatch_result.py` was imported at runtime but omitted from the sealed overlay, and the candidate verifier did not byte-check the maintenance runtime modules in wheels. The new regression failed first, the closure was corrected, and 39 focused tests plus Ruff/LSP are green. I’m starting deterministic A/B builds from isolated copied inputs.


The twin wheels are byte-identical, with 1,049 Hermes members and 123 profile members; ZIP CRC, member metadata, RECORD hashes/sizes, and all 11 wheel-hosted maintenance sources match. The disposable candidate sealed at `/tmp` and its canonical verifier passed with 380 source members. I’m now sealing the explicit Sep 2 maintenance binding and replaying both digest stages independently, still entirely under the disposable root.


The sealed controller/safety/adversarial/closure/observer/lifecycle suite now passes from the disposable frozen source copy with the twin wheels installed and `PYTHONPATH` empty: 74 passed. Installed manual runtime at 02:00/02:01 produced one audit, no repeat write, unchanged ledger, and zero claim/send/edit/provider/network/customer actions; Sep 3 reached the fake normal path exactly once. I’m running the final source-wide maintenance/controller and strict static gates, then I’ll freeze evidence and remove every disposable root.


All final gates are green: Ruff, ty, basedpyright, compile/import, no-excuse, 39 focused tests, 238 maintenance tests, 129 controller/package tests, 74 installed sealed suites, and 61 installed maintenance tests. The final freeze rebuild remained byte-identical. I’m writing the digest-complete receipt, then deleting the candidate, preseal, venv, build copies, caches, and fault artifacts and proving authoritative absence plus immutable r71 equality.


I read this as disposable-only r71b qualification - completed without creating authoritative roots.

**DISPOSABLE_PACKAGE_PASS**

Evidence:
`/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-10-r71b-disposable-package.json`

SHA-256: `10d07638a2d327e60818d9e3349b398f0e60d91a780c3131cf4a5cc10f2bcad4`

Highlights:
- Fixed missing runtime-source overlay and strengthened wheel/source parity verification.
- Twin wheels byte-identical:
  - Hermes: `f8a205c29e877b5740b9460c80cb82045c04445bb2c1ce139118497efa5bc2b1`
  - Profile: `e6c1fd77251cf43f8bde1759b9fb170e592e47851708c292297d3040b1d4f84f`
- Disposable candidate: `01dcf83c23361ae97344e2cec9e0c1e3c0dc48f8e48d790ac8722ae51da559cf`
- Final package digest: `8dee68860eff685b67a95b1d9cda9892f892d763a75a66f3a8a5555996392b94`
- Tests: 238 maintenance, 129 controller/package, 74 installed sealed, 61 installed maintenance, 39 final focused.
- Ruff, ty, basedpyright, compile/import, no-excuse, and LSP passed.
- Manual Sep 2/Sep 3 oracle passed with provider/network/customer actions zero.
- All disposable roots removed; authoritative r71b/action/live roots remain absent.
- Immutable r71 trees remained byte- and mode-identical.

Architectural review: single-purpose modules, typed boundaries, exhaustive variants preserved, no escape hatches or redundant defenses, tests cover the regression, parameter and naming checks pass, and logging was untouched.


I read this as a full disposable r71b requalification after the confirmed YAML-boundary update - I’ll first verify the Sep 2 quiet window and authoritative-root constraints, then regenerate the source freeze, receipts, twin wheels, dual-name candidate, preseal/rehearsal/installed QA, and cleanup evidence from the current source without live actions.


The window is confirmed future (`2026-09-02 02:00-02:30 KST`), 30 minutes, before 08:00, and outside reminder/cutoff time. The failed attempt-1 candidate exists as the required immutable tombstone; candidate-r2 and every preseal/action/observer root are absent. I’m freezing its byte/mode tree now and running the YAML, runtime, controller, omission/tamper, and strict suites against the current source.


The complete receipt/overlay/candidate union is 134 files (96 production, 38 tests), including the strict YAML loader and both YAML test modules. YAML/current-profile tests are 17/17, combined controller/package/YAML 141/141, runtime 238/238, and guard selection 38/38; Ruff, ty, basedpyright, compile/import, and LSP are clean. No package test failed, so no source edit is permitted or needed. I’m building the final A/B wheels from fresh cache-free copies now.


The regenerated source freeze is now authoritative for source comparison: 134 files, hash stream `7fce8137...`, superseding `e8f8dcab...`. The new nonempty authority-verification receipt is bound to that freeze, deterministic wheels, runtime/controller/disposable/YAML verifier chain, and the immutable failed attempt-1 tombstone. I’m sealing the same disposable inputs under two distinct outer names and requiring identical candidate identities plus canonical verifier passes.


Both disposable outer names produced the same candidate digest `2a85524e...`, identical manifests, a nonempty single-file receipt inventory, and canonical verifier passes. The disposable preseal then reconstructed the copied current-profile YAML and projection, yielding package binding `d2902c33...` and final package `98146e39...` with independent replay. I’m now exercising the transaction rehearsal and wheel-installed zero-call/YAML boundaries.


The installed-wheel/YAML suite is 73/73 with `PYTHONPATH` empty and an IPv4/IPv6 socket guard installed before product imports. Manual 02:00/02:01 behavior produced one no-op audit and zero claim/record/send/edit/provider/network/customer actions; Sep 3 released exactly once. Final guards are 45/45, and direct attacks rejected receipt omission/tamper plus YAML-source omission/tamper. I’m consolidating the new package and recovery receipts, then performing immutable-tree and authoritative-absence checks before deleting all disposable roots.


I read this as completed disposable r71b regeneration - reporting the new frozen identities and verification result.

**DISPOSABLE_PACKAGE_PASS**

Exact digests:

- Source hash stream: `7fce813732b2960e1bdb2195c6bead5a6e6f9de3f7ef4267b9179dd93bdf9f91`
- Source-freeze file: `4aef39c8375eba7b438c9d98b9754e9f80790414c7ace338831d2239aae23f0a`
- Authority verification: `515a6d460f5b1e2ebfb6e55ba03c42b2adb4916b1c595d393a52cbba72afb6f6`
- Hermes wheel: `f8a205c29e877b5740b9460c80cb82045c04445bb2c1ce139118497efa5bc2b1`
- Profile wheel: `e6c1fd77251cf43f8bde1759b9fb170e592e47851708c292297d3040b1d4f84f`
- Candidate: `2a85524e610edef582583bb89e6cde57ccd03fe9a9489887fd6c8319e10843f6`
- Candidate manifest: `9c90f51ec632e1dc9b0ac37ef8aab02c68369b0330960157413e74744c0aeb77`
- Package binding: `d2902c332fde622895fcd460c6715d290c6b319ca57c21a6559589b0c1b95145`
- Final package: `98146e3946b7877b32aa9d950c39ffd7e6dd4027ad29f9a30fcde84ada2bfbd4`
- Hold ID: `b9abf1e4fa068f442eb32dc2f1392bd7bc31106ebc940f968e6e83cc7d4fc163`
- Hold SHA-256: `e22403c4b6318a733c08f17431b450f4319747bb158d514ec88fc6a82fdd4639`
- Authority SHA-256: `e4aedd4cb810f13bafe9964e42138d28602d1045795a6565f7b1fe0b4827a205`

Evidence updated:

- `task-10-r71b-final-source-freeze.json`
- `task-10-r71b-authority-verification.json`
- `task-10-r71b-disposable-package.json` — SHA-256 `d001166cc2e329c2373041d5c9e39f5599083522f91ca4dc042e8060d3eddc55`
- `task-10-r71b-yaml-regeneration-recovery.json` — SHA-256 `a18fcc4d0e095f911663097b6c31af41bbf18c368758ba96a1a632abdfe31dbf`

Verification included 134 frozen sources/tests, deterministic A/B wheel parity, two-name candidate identity, 17 YAML/current-profile tests, 238 runtime tests, 141 controller/package tests, 45 final guards, 51 rehearsal tests, and 73 installed tests.

Failed attempt-1 remained byte/mode-identical. Candidate-r2, preseal, authorization, execution, observer, rehearsal, and live maintenance roots remain absent. All disposable roots were removed; no source, Git, network, provider, customer, or live-service actions occurred.