I read this as an independent adversarial recovery verification - I’ll inspect the frozen authority chain and verifier tooling, execute only disposable/no-call checks, clean all temporary roots, and write the requested evidence receipt.


I read this as the execution phase of the same adversarial verification - the receipt chain is internally coherent so far, but I’m now replaying the candidate and preseal derivations from source rather than trusting their self-reported PASS fields.


I read this as a blocker-sensitive continuation - independent replay exposed a real omitted blocker: the canonical preparer rejects the current authoritative profile’s ordinary YAML list entries before it can derive the claimed package digest, so I’m completing the negative guards and preservation checks before issuing a needs-fix receipt.


I read this as completion reporting - the adversarial receipt is written and verified.

Delivered:

`/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-10-r71b-candidate-r2-recovery-adversarial.json`

- Verdict: `needs-fix`
- Confidence: `0.99`
- Blocker count: `1`
- Blocker: canonical preseal preparation rejects the current profile YAML before package derivation.
- Both disposable candidates reproduced digest `4abeff79...e0dc` and passed canonical verification.
- Installed no-call oracle passed with zero calls.
- Disposable roots cleaned; authoritative roots remain absent.
- Receipt JSON validated with no diagnostics.
- Receipt SHA-256: `2fcfc509103fdc3f167f857e8b47bded0f00d88e8a994465853f3f4808e21b33`


I read this as a read-only delta re-review of the YAML blocker - I’ll inspect the new trusted-loader boundary, run the adversarial parser/preparer/controller tests and strict diagnostics, verify disposable-only effects, then update the recovery evidence with closure plus freeze/digest invalidation.


I read this as the verification result turning negative - the current delta fixes ordinary sequences but still accepts duplicate keys, non-recursive aliases, and a 2 MB document, so the requested fail-closed boundary is not closed; I’m running the full relevant suite and diagnostics to distinguish functional regressions from the remaining security blocker.


I read this as delta re-review completion - evidence is updated with the verified partial closure and remaining blocker.

Updated:

`task-10-r71b-candidate-r2-recovery-adversarial.json`

Verdict remains `needs-fix`, confidence `0.995`, blocker count `1`.

Findings:
- Current profile sequences now parse and disposable artifact generation succeeds.
- 99 relevant tests passed.
- Ruff, ty, basedpyright, LSP, and compile checks passed.
- Duplicate keys, aliases, and oversized YAML remain incorrectly accepted.
- Freeze and prior candidate/package digests are invalidated and require regeneration.
- No authoritative roots or live state changed.
- Evidence SHA-256: `eecbe44bd21674ebcb7262f260ae1afd026d83f7b74363e2061d39f6b80606a0`


I read this as the final read-only YAML delta verification - I’ll independently exercise pre-construction size/event guards, the full negative matrix and current-profile disposable derivation, run the 99-test suite plus strict checks, verify preservation, then update only the adversarial evidence.


I read this as the full verification phase - the independent 12-case matrix now rejects every malformed class and accepts ordinary sequences; I’m running a separate 100-test preparer/controller suite and all strict validators before deciding closure and recording the stale-freeze hold.


I read this as final YAML delta completion - verification passed and evidence is updated.

- YAML blocker: closed
- Independent matrix: 12/12 passed
- Relevant suite: 100/100 passed
- Strict diagnostics: clean
- Seal safety: false pending freeze, wheel, authority, candidate, and package-digest regeneration
- No package/live/authoritative roots changed
- Evidence SHA-256: `297272234451b90393118c8b3420484f3c7bb4a8cd161bc02fd5b3cddaca2221`