{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"running","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as a read-only recovery investigation and disposable sealing exercise - I’ll trace the stale r2 overlay, prove the corrected closure with two disposable candidates, remove all disposable roots, and write the requested recovery evidence only."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The immutable history shows r2 was sealed after the 134-file freeze but still carries a predecessor overlay artifact; I’m now comparing only path/hash metadata and tracing the sealer’s overlay/input-root semantics before creating disposable proofs."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The root cause is now exact: r2 used a fresh receipt-only root but passed attempt1’s separate `task-v15r71b-maintenance-inputs/successor-overlay.sha256`; the sealer copied current source bytes while binding the stale preparation hash, so canonical verification fails. I’m sealing two candidates from one newly generated, inode-distinct disposable bundle to establish the r3 digest and outer-path independence."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"write","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The disposable result matches the current expected identity (`2a85524e...`) twice and both canonical verifiers pass. I’m validating the evidence artifact and rechecking cleanup, authoritative-root absence, and immutable-tree preservation."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as completed recovery evidence delivery - I traced the stale overlay, proved a safe r3 sequence, and verified cleanup and immutability.\n\nCreated:\n\n`/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-10-r71b-candidate-r3-overlay-recovery.json`\n\n- Verdict: `RECOVERABLE`\n- Expected candidate digest: `2a85524e610edef582583bb89e6cde57ccd03fe9a9489887fd6c8319e10843f6`\n- Evidence SHA-256: `5e27bc6d6179294638daccec7950fbaff7be1516a15ae9cbc7fd8e6d1a4e5acd`\n- Root cause: r2 used its fresh receipt root but reused attempt1’s stale shared overlay.\n- Two disposable candidates passed canonical verification with identical identities under different outer paths.\n- Disposable roots removed; authoritative r3 roots remain absent.\n- Attempt1 and r2 immutable trees remained unchanged.\n- JSON parsing, diagnostics, freeze134 revalidation, and root-absence checks passed."}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident"}}